A PUBLICATION OF RANDOM U.S.GOVERNMENT PRESS RELEASES AND ARTICLES
Friday, May 4, 2012
NEW CONSULATE GENERAL COMPOUND IN SURABAYA, INDONESIA
FROM: U.S. STATE DEPARTMENT
United States Dedicates New Consulate General Compound in Surabaya, Indonesia
Media Note Office of the Spokesperson Washington, DC
May 3, 2012
U.S. Ambassador to Indonesia, Scot Marciel dedicated the new Consulate General facility in Surabaya today, celebrating our deepening commitment to the comprehensive partnership between the United States and Indonesia. Governor of East Java, Dr. H. Soekarwo; Acting Director General of America and Europe Affairs, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Mr. M.Wahid Supriyadi; Consul General, Kristen Bauer; and Director of the Office of Design and Engineering of the Bureau of Overseas Buildings Operations (OBO), William Miner participated in the ribbon-cutting ceremony.
Occupying a six-acre site in the Citra Raya development, the new facility serves as an important platform for U.S. diplomacy in Indonesia and throughout the region and creates a secure, state-of-the-art, environmentally-sustainable workplace for approximately 200 employees.
The Consulate General provides improved facilities to serve both U.S. and Indonesian citizens, such as a more comfortable consular area for visa services and American citizen services and an Information Resources Center where information and programs on the United States will be available.
The compound incorporates numerous sustainable features, most notably a storm water management system designed to capture downpours and slowly discharge the water to the city so that flooding is minimized; the use of drip irrigation and recycled wastewater; and a wastewater treatment plant.
Aurora, LLC of Rockville, MD constructed the new Consulate General and Sorg Architects of Washington, D.C. is the architect of record. The $64 million project generated hundreds of jobs in both the United States and Indonesia.
Since 1999, as part of the Department’s Capital Security Construction Program, OBO has completed 89 new diplomatic facilities and has moved more than 27,000 people into safe, secure, and functional facilities. OBO has an additional 43 projects in design or construction.
SEC CHARGES MAN AND COHORTS WITH SELLING BOGUS STOCKS TO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF THE EARTHQUAKE IN HAITI
FROM: U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C., May 2, 2012 — The Securities and Exchange Commission today charged a Florida man and 10 cohorts involved in two separate schemes to illegally sell stock, including one that sought to capitalize on circumstances in Haiti following the earthquake that destroyed much of the country's infrastructure in January 2010.
The SEC alleges that Kevin Sepe of Miami masterminded the schemes involving two microcap companies — Recycle Tech and HydroGenetics — with the help of three licensed attorneys and several others who collectively reaped illegal profits of more than $3.5 million. Aventura, Fla.-based attorneyRonny Halperin assisted Sepe in both schemes. The Recycle Tech scheme involved a promotional campaign to pump the price and volume of the purported home container building company's stock in the wake of the Haiti earthquake. The HydroGenetics scheme took millions of unregistered shares of the company — purportedly in the business of acquiring emerging alternative energy companies — and improperly converted its debt into free-trading shares that were dumped on the investing public.
Six of the 11 individuals involved have agreed to settlements ordering them and companies they own to collectively pay more than $3.2 million.
"Sepe, Halperin, and others chose to ignore the laws governing stock sales and play by their own set of rules," said Eric I. Bustillo, Director of the SEC's Miami Regional Office. "Some of these individuals were attorneys and corporate officers who should have known better, and we will continue to crack down on any such gatekeepers who put investors at risk with their harmful activities to manipulate the markets."
According to the SEC's complaint filed in federal court in Miami, Sepe and Halperin evaded registration requirements by converting backdated and fabricated promissory notes into unrestricted stock of Recycle Tech, quoted on the Pink Sheets. With help from Recycle Tech's CEO and president Ryan Gonzalez, they conducted a pump-and-dump scheme from January to March 2010 by enlisting the help of two promoters — Anthony Thompson andJay Fung — who touted Recycle Tech in their newsletters. David Rees, a Utah-based attorney, became involved in the scheme when he drafted an improper legal opinion letter authorizing the issuance of unrestricted Recycle Tech shares.
The SEC alleges that the participants collectively made more than $1 million in illegal profits through the scheme, which touted that Recycle Tech signed a binding letter of intent to build up to 50 container homes in Haiti following the earthquake. However, Recycle Tech failed to disclose to investors that it had no funds, no finished container homes, and minimal operations. Sepe orchestrated, coordinated, and funded the scheme and sold Recycle Tech stock along with Halperin and Rees without any exemption from registering those securities with the SEC. Gonzalez, who lives in Miami, made the scheme possible by incorporating a sham private company, turning the public shell of that company into Recycle Tech through a reverse merger, and signing various fraudulent documents to authorize the issuance of Recycle Tech securities. Gonzalez also drafted and issued false press releases used to hype Recycle Tech stock. Thompson and Fung — through their firms OTC Solutions LLC and Pudong LLC — touted Recycle Tech in their newsletters without disclosing that they were selling shares or adequately disclosing the compensation they received for their touts.
According to the SEC's other complaint filed in Miami, Sepe and Halperin schemed with Miami-based attorney Melissa Rice and others to illegally issue and liquidate 90 million unregistered shares of HydroGenetics from April 2008 until at least June 2009. Sepe headed a group that purchased convertible debt of a South Florida publicly-held company. He then formed HydroGenetics and parsed out portions of the convertible debt to friends, family, and others who converted the debt to stock that they then sold publicly. Sepe sold HydroGenetics stock without any exemption from registration the securities with the SEC. Halperin was the HydroGenetics CEO and a director. He executed corporate resolutions to help issue millions of shares of HydroGenetics stock, including 11 million shares to his daughter who he told to sell it and funnel a portion of the illegal proceeds back to him. Rice assisted Sepe in converting convertible debt to unrestricted HydroGenetics shares, and wrote four opinion letters improperly opining that the Rule 144 safe harbor was applicable and the debt could be converted to unrestricted HydroGenetics shares. Rice also sold her shares of HydroGenetics stock.
The SEC alleges that three other Miami residents also received illegal profits in the HydroGenetics scheme: Luz Rodriguez, who worked as an office administrator and assistant to Sepe; Howard Ettelman, a provider of accounting services to various companies owned by Sepe and Rice; and Seth Eber, a self-employed jeweler who was on the list of individuals that Sepe provided Rice to assign shares.
The SEC further alleges that Charles Hansen III of Lighthouse Point, Fla., succeeded Halperin as HydroGenetics CEO in April 2009 and signed five corporate resolutions authorizing HydroGenetics to illegally issue stock that Rice then used along with her opinion letter to facilitate the scheme.
The individuals agreeing to settle the SEC's charges in the complaints without admitting or denying the allegations are Sepe, Halperin, Rees, Rice, Ettelman, and Hansen.
Sepe agreed to disgorgement of $1,416,466.16, prejudgment interest of $126,761.86, and penalties of $185,000 as well as a permanent bar from participating in an offer or sale of penny stocks.
Halperin agreed to disgorgement of $427,609.95, prejudgment interest of $33,595.33, and a penalty of $100,000 as well as a permanent penny stock bar and a five-year officer and director bar. He also agreed to surrender 1.97 million shares of HydroGenetics stock.
Rees agreed to disgorgement of $5,982, prejudgment interest of $406.25, and a penalty of $7,500 as well as a one-year prohibition from providing professional legal services connected to the offer or sale of securities.
Rice agreed to disgorgement of $422,445, prejudgment interest of $39,239.18, and a penalty of $60,000 as well as a five-year penny stock bar and three-year prohibition from providing professional legal services connected to the offer or sale of securities.
Ettelman agreed to disgorgement of $32,667, prejudgment interest of $3,093.27, and a penalty of $25,000 as well as a five-year penny stock bar and the surrender of 300,000 shares of HydroGenetics stock.
Hansen agreed to a $37,500 penalty.
Two companies — Charter Consulting Group (owned and controlled by Sepe) and West Coast Investments Enterprises (owned by Rice) — were named as relief defendants in the SEC's complaints because they received a portion of the illegal trading profits in the schemes. They each settled the case, with Charter agreeing to disgorgement of $150,000 and prejudgment interest of $9,125 and West Coast agreeing to disgorgement of $125,000 and prejudgment interest of $11,262.71.
Separately, the SEC issued orders to suspend trading in the securities of Recycle Tech and HydroGenetics and to institute administrative proceedings against each company to determine whether the registration of their securities should be revoked or suspended based on their failure to file required periodic reports.
The SEC also instituted separate settled administrative proceedings against HydroGenetics in which the company, without admitting or denying the findings, consented to an order requiring it to cease and desist from committing or causing violations of the registration provisions of the federal securities laws.
The SEC's investigations were conducted by staff in its Miami Regional Office. Accountant Kathleen Strandell was involved in the Recycle Tech investigation under the supervision of Thierry Olivier Desmet, and James Carlson is leading the litigation. Special Investigations Counsel Gary Miller and accountants Karaz Zaki and Timothy Galdencio were involved in the HydroGenetics investigation under the supervision of Elisha Frank, and Amie Riggle Berlin is leading the litigation.
The SEC acknowledges the assistance of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) in these cases.
CHAIRMAN JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF PRAISES "HEROES OF MILITARY MEDICINE"
FROM: AMERICAN FORCES PRESS SERVICE
Chairman Praises 'Heroes of Military Medicine'
By Karen Parrish
WASHINGTON, May 3, 2012 - The network of people, government and private organizations that tends to America's wounded, injured and ill service members has achieved results over the last decade that are "absolutely remarkable," the nation's top military officer told an audience here yesterday.
Army Gen. Martin E. Dempsey, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, spoke last night at a "Heroes of Military Medicine" event hosted by the Center for Public-Private Partnerships at the Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine.
"I do find heroes and military medicine to be a little redundant, actually. ... Every time we think they can't do more for us, they step up and find it," the general said.
Earlier this week, Dempsey noted, he attended the opening ceremonies for the 2012 Warrior Games in Colorado Springs, Colo. The games, which continue through May 5, are a series of Olympic-style events in which wounded, ill and injured service members of all services, along with veterans, compete in archery, cycling, shooting, sitting volleyball, swimming, track and field and wheelchair basketball.
The Warrior Games, created in 2010, are a combined effort of the U.S. Olympic Committee and the Defense Department. The games are notable because of the courage of the competitors, who Dempsey said are "young men and women putting ability over disability."
The chairman said attending both the games and the "heroes of medicine" gathering in the same week highlighted for him the connection between today's service members, who survive combat injuries at rates never before seen, and the medical establishment that makes their survival possible.
"What I want you to know tonight is how much we, who wear the uniform today, appreciate what everyone is doing to pull together in the common cause of making sure that the young men and women who put themselves in harm's way are cared for," Dempsey said.
ECOSYSTEM EFFECTS OF BIODIVERSITY LOSS
FROM: NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
Photo: Wikimedia
Ecosystem Effects of Biodiversity Loss Rival Climate Change and Pollution
First comprehensive effort to compare biodiversity loss to other human-caused environmental changes
May 2, 2012
Loss of biodiversity appears to affect ecosystems as much as climate change, pollution and other major forms of environmental stress, according to results of a new study by an international research team.
The study is the first comprehensive effort to directly compare the effects of biological diversity loss to the anticipated effects of a host of other human-caused environmental changes.
The results, published in this week's issue of the journal Nature, highlight the need for stronger local, national and international efforts to protect biodiversity and the benefits it provides, according to the researchers, who are based at nine institutions in the United States, Canada and Sweden.
"This analysis establishes that reduced biodiversity affects ecosystems at levels comparable to those of global warming and air pollution," said Henry Gholz, program director in the National Science Foundation's Division of Environmental Biology, which funded the research directly and through the National Center for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis.
"Some people have assumed that biodiversity effects are relatively minor compared to other environmental stressors," said biologist David Hooper of Western Washington University, the lead author of the paper.
"Our results show that future loss of species has the potential to reduce plant production just as much as global warming and pollution."
Studies over the last two decades demonstrated that more biologically diverse ecosystems are more productive.
As a result, there has been growing concern that the very high rates of modern extinctions--due to habitat loss, overharvesting and other human-caused environmental changes--could reduce nature's ability to provide goods and services such as food, clean water and a stable climate.
Until now, it's been unclear how biodiversity losses stack up against other human-caused environmental changes that affect ecosystem health and productivity.
"Loss of biological diversity due to species extinctions is going to have major effects on our planet, and we need to prepare ourselves to deal with them," said ecologist Bradley Cardinale of the University of Michigan, one of the paper's co-authors. "These extinctions may well rank as one of the top five drivers of global change."
In the study, Hooper, Cardinale and colleagues combined data from a large number of published studies to compare how various global environmental stressors affect two processes important in ecosystems: plant growth and the decomposition of dead plants by bacteria and fungi.
The study involved the construction of a database drawn from 192 peer-reviewed publications about experiments that manipulated species richness and examined their effect on ecosystem processes.
This global synthesis found that in areas where local species loss during this century falls within the lower range of projections (losses of 1 to 20 percent of plant species), negligible effects on ecosystem plant growth will result, and changes in species richness will rank low relative to the effects projected for other environmental changes.
In ecosystems where species losses fall within intermediate projections of 21 to 40 percent of species, however, species loss is expected to reduce plant growth by 5 to 10 percent.
The effect is comparable to the expected effects of climate warming and increased ultraviolet radiation due to stratospheric ozone loss.
At higher levels of extinction (41 to 60 percent of species), the effects of species loss ranked with those of many other major drivers of environmental change, such as ozone pollution, acid deposition on forests and nutrient pollution.
"Within the range of expected species losses, we saw average declines in plant growth that were as large as changes in experiments simulating several other major environmental changes caused by humans," Hooper said.
"Several of us working on this study were surprised by the comparative strength of those effects."
The strength of the observed biodiversity effects suggests that policymakers searching for solutions to other pressing environmental problems should be aware of potential adverse effects on biodiversity as well.
Still to be determined is how diversity loss and other large-scale environmental changes will interact to alter ecosystems.
"The biggest challenge looking forward is to predict the combined effects of these environmental challenges to natural ecosystems and to society," said J. Emmett Duffy of the Virginia Institute of Marine Science, a co-author of the paper.
JUSTICE AND MORTGAGE INSURANCE PROVIDER RESOLVE WOMEN ON MATERNITY LEAVE DISCRIMINATION ALLEGATIONS
FROM: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Monday, April 30, 2012
Justice Department Reaches Settlement with Nation’s Largest Mortgage Insurance Provider to Resolve Allegations of Discrimination Against Women on Maternity Leave Settlement Provides Compensation to 70 Victims Identified by the Department of Justice and Establishes Fair Procedures for Treating Borrowers Taking Leave to Care for a New Child
The Department of Justice announced today that it has settled its lawsuit against the Mortgage Guaranty Insurance Corporation (MGIC) for discriminating against women on maternity leave in violation of the Fair Housing Act. This settlement is the department’s first involving discrimination against women and families in mortgage insurance.
The lawsuit, filed on July 5, 2011, in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania, alleged that MGIC required women on maternity leave to return to work before the company would insure their mortgages even for women who had a guaranteed right to return to work after the leave. Most mortgage lenders require applicants seeking to borrow more than 80 percent of their home’s value to obtain mortgage insurance.
The settlement, which was approved by the court today, establishes a $511,250 fund to compensate 70 individuals whom the United States identified as aggrieved by the alleged discriminatory treatment between 2007 and 2010. The settlement also requires MGIC to pay a $38,750 civil penalty to the United States. The Department of Justice identified the aggrieved individuals based on its extensive review of MGIC’s mortgage application records. MGIC cooperated with the United States in turning over records during the course of settlement negotiations.
The settlement also requires MGIC to follow a number of detailed nondiscriminatory provisions in its future review of mortgage insurance applications involving women or men who are on, or have returned from, paid or unpaid leave related to the birth, adoption or foster care placement of a child. The settlement also requires MGIC to monitor its treatment of applicants on leave to care for a new child, to train its employees on the requirements of the fair housing laws, and to provide nondiscrimination notices to mortgage applicants.
“No company involved in lending should force a parent to give up her or his legal right to take time off from work to care for a new child in order to obtain a mortgage loan,” said Thomas E. Perez, Assistant Attorney General for the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Division. “Today’s settlement, coming at the close of fair housing month, protects that important right and clearly demonstrates the department will not hesitate to take action against companies who discriminate against women and families.”
“In bringing justice to these 70 victims, this office confirms our resolve to protect the civil rights of citizens of the Western District of Pennsylvania from illegal discriminatory practices,” said David J. Hickton, U.S. Attorney of the Western District of Pennsylvania. “Discrimination in lending has profound and widespread consequences that will not be tolerated.”
“Mortgage insurance is essential in order for many people to buy a home,” said John Trasviña, HUD Assistant Secretary for Fair Housing and Equal Opportunity. “Borrowers should not be denied mortgage insurance for the very reason they often buy a home: to provide a decent home for an expanding family. HUD will continue to work with the Justice Department to take appropriate action against insurers and lenders who violate the Fair Housing Act.”
This lawsuit arose as a result of a complaint filed with the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) by a Wexford, Penn., loan applicant. After investigating the complaint, HUD issued a charge of discrimination and referred the case to the Department of Justice after the parties were unable to settle their dispute and the complainant elected to have the case heard in federal court. The Department of Justice also filed the case under the attorney general’s authority to seek redress for housing discrimination that raises an issue of general public importance. The HUD complainant will receive $42,500 from the settlement fund, to address her specific pain and suffering and compensate her for leave that she forfeited in response to MGIC’s requirement that she return to work.
Individuals compensated as part of the settlement will remain eligible to receive compensation from the separate private class action lawsuit brought by the HUD complainant. MGIC has entered into a preliminary settlement of the class action lawsuit, which remains subject to court approval, allowing victims of MGIC’s alleged maternity leave discrimination to submit claims for extraordinary damages above the amount covered by the compensation provided through MGIC’s settlement with the United States.
REACTIVE MATERIALS WARHEADS UNDER DEVELOPMENT
FROM: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE ARMED WITH SCIENCE
Photo: U.S. Army
Written on MAY 1, 2012 AT 7:36 AM by JTOZER
Lethal Technology
Imagine a warhead with fragments that flare and burn when the warhead detonates.
Now imagine the potential destruction of anartillery shell made almost entirely of that stuff.
Such a theoretical weapon is one of the goals behind the research being conducted by Picatinny Arsenal engineers working at the Advanced Materials Lab.
In conventional artillery shells, the explosive force generated upon detonation causes the warhead to break apart. The resulting fragments flung out in all directions are great speed explains how these weapons cause their damage.
But the potential destructive force is increased dramatically with capabilities of reactive materials that can be formed and strengthened to replace the inert materials that make up the rest of the warhead.
The reactive materials form the structure of the warhead rather than simply being loaded into the warhead.
“Structured reactive materials, or SRM, will enhance the lethality of current and future weapons while maintaining or reducing the payload,” said Paul Redner, a materials engineer with the Advanced Materials Lab.
“Unlike with more traditional (reactive materials), SRM will be a direct one-to-one replacement of inert components.”
The engineers have already made progress in the research, yet challenges remain.
“Despite all of the positive results and lofty goals mentioned above, nothing is ever that simple,” said Redner. Among the challenges that researchers are working to overcome, the greatest is how to process components to form more complex shapes.
Through collaboration with other labs, including the Office of Naval Research, researchers are seeking solutions to these technical challenges.
Advances in structured reactive materials are made possible through the continued development of nanomaterials at Picatinny’s state-of-the-art lab, which was established to make viable technologies ready for transition to development programs.
“We wish that people would ask to see how we fabricate nanoscaled and nanostructured powders, and how we establish the pedigree for our materials,” Redner said.
“We have a wide variety of capabilities and we are open to talk to the ARDEC, PEO Ammunition and the project management communities any time.”
U.S. STATE DEPARTMENT PRESS STATEMENT ON SOMALI TRANSITION
FROM: U.S. STATE DEPARTMENT
Somalia Political Process
Press Statement Mark C. Toner
Deputy Spokesperson, Office of the Spokesperson Washington, DC
May 3, 2012
Less than four months remain for Somali leaders to complete the steps they agreed to in the Roadmap to End the Transition, which lays out the steps for replacing Somalia’s transitional government with a more representative governance structure that will bring Somalia closer to the security and political stability for which Somalis have waited for too long. The United States is encouraged by the progress made so far, however, several steps remain to be completed: selection of delegates to a constituent assembly; approval of a new constitution, selection of a new and smaller parliament, and the indirect election of a new speaker and president.
Secretary Clinton made clear the position of the United States during her remarks at the London Conference on Somalia in February when she stated, "Attempts to obstruct progress and maintain the broken status quo will not be tolerated. We will encourage the international community to impose further sanctions, including travel bans and asset freezes, on people inside and outside [Somalia’s] Transitional Federal Government who seek to undermine Somalia’s peace and security or to delay or even prevent the political transition."
The United States supports the open letter issued on May 1 by the special representatives of the United Nations, African Union, and Intergovernmental Authority on Development that puts on notice all individuals and entities who seek to undermine Somalia's political transition that the international community will not tolerate such action. The United States is following the lead of its African partners and working to help Somalia’s Transitional Federal Government and other Somali leaders seize the current opportunity to make progress toward greater security and political stability.
Thursday, May 3, 2012
THE LITTORAL COMBAT SHIPS
FROM: U.S. NAVY
The first of class littoral combat ships USS Freedom (LCS 1), left, and USS Independence (LCS 2), maneuver together during an exercise off the coast of Southern California. The littoral combat ship is a fast, agile, networked surface combatant designed to operate in the near-shore environment, while capable of open-ocean tasking, and win against 21st-century coastal threats such as submarines, mines, and swarming small craft. U.S. Navy photo by Lt. Jan Shultis
RESPONSIBILITIES OF A MILITARY DOG HANDLER
FROM: AMERICAN FORCES PRESS SERVICE
Face of Defense: Dog Handler Enjoys Responsibilities
Marine Corps Lance Cpl. Jeffery Rodriguez stands with his dog, Dharma, April 26, 2012. U.S. Marine Corps photo by Cpl. Timothy Lenzo
By Marine Corps Cpl. Timothy Lenzo
1st Marine Division Public Affairs
TREK NAWA, Afghanistan, May 2, 2012 - Many children beg their parents for a dog. The floppy ears and wagging tail seem to attract children to man's best friend. But many parents know that caring for a dog means a lot of responsibility, training and effort.
Dog handlers in the Marine Corps not only shoulder that same responsibility — they volunteer for it on top of the responsibilities of being deployed to Afghanistan.
For Marine Corps Cpl. Jeffery Rodriguez, a dog handler with Weapons Company, 2nd Battalion, 6th Marine Regiment, those responsibilities are more like a privilege.
Rodriguez said he loves being a dog handler. He knows he's helping his squad, and the added responsibilities far outweigh the added attention of caring for a dog.
What sets Rodriguez apart from other dog handlers is the personal effort he puts into Dharma, a 4-year-old Labrador retriever.
"He's the best dog handler I've ever seen," said Marine Corps Sgt. Edward Welsh, Rodriguez's squad leader. "He's constantly taking care of the dog and working to make himself and Dharma better."
Rodriguez, a native of Fayetteville, Ga., knows that a dog handler's job is more than just patrolling with and feeding the dog. The most important job is ensuring the dog is well prepared for the deployment ahead.
Shortly after he arrived in Afghanistan he built Dharma a new kennel. The kennel, made from discarded pieces of Hesko wall, has a door and a crate for Dharma to sleep in. He used excess cargo netting to cover half of the kennel to shield Dharma from the harsh wind and heat of Afghanistan. Keeping the dogs in shape is vital in an area where temperatures will reach more than 100 degrees Fahrenheit.
"If a dog gets out of breath in 20 to 30 minutes, they actually become a hindrance to the unit," explained Marine Corps 1st Lt. Joseph Hoeksema, Rodriguez's platoon commander. "Dharma is in shape, and [Rodriguez] works her out two to three times a day."
The bond between a dog handler and his dog is based on trust. If a dog doesn't trust the handler, it won't obey commands.
"He tells her to sit there and stay there, [and] she does it," said Hoeksema, a native of Davenport, Iowa. "It doesn't matter if we are getting shot at -- she's obeying [Rodriguez]."
Dharma helps Rodriguez to find improvised explosive devices and weapons caches. "I use Dharma to search compounds, or to verify potentially dangerous objects," Rodriguez said. "She's like my little guardian angel running around."
The Marines patrol with Dharma daily, clearing compounds and routes. "Just trusting [Dharma] helps the Marines," Hoeksema said. "When she goes into a compound and doesn't find an IED, the Marines are able to walk in confident that there aren't any IEDs."
Dharma confirmed two IEDs and some hidden-away weapons while deployed; but beyond her keen nose, she's made more of an impact on the Marines she protects. Dharma also helps with morale of Marines who are away from their families for several months.
After patrolling, the Marines regularly pet and play with Dharma. They also laugh as she interacts with the local animals; goats and turkeys make an interesting find for a curious dog. The sound of wings flapping and a loud gobble lets the squad know Dharma is up to some good-natured mischief. Rodriguez lets it go for a little bit before calling Dharma back.
"It has been a great experience being a dog handler," he said. "It's a great job to have with a lot of responsibility."
In a couple of weeks, Rodriguez and Dharma will return home from their deployment to Afghanistan. This is Dharma's first deployment, and it could be Rodriguez's last. They'll return on the same flight, but then will be separated. Dharma will be assigned a new dog handler, and Rodriguez will return to his squad.
Though the goodbye will be hard, Rodriguez said, he has loved every minute of being a dog handler. The bond he built with Dharma and the experience was well worth the extra responsibility, he added.
2012 WARRIOR GAMES ARE UNDERWAY
FROM: U.S. NAVY
COLORADO SPRINGS, Colo. (May 2, 2012) Hospital Corpsman 2nd Class Sonny Lemerande, right, races down the court during the wheelchair basketball competition between the Special Operations and the Navy/Coast Guard at the 2012 Warrior Games. More than 200 wounded, ill or injured service members from the U.S. and British armed forces are scheduled to compete in the Paralympics-style competition, May 1-5. (U.S. Navy photo by Mass Communication Specialist 2nd Class David Danals/Released)
SEC CHARGES VOIP COMPANY AND ITS OWNERS WITH CONDUCTING A FRAUDULENT OFFERING TARGETING CHRISTIAN INVESTORS
FROM: U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
April 30, 2012
On April 30, 2012, the Securities and Exchange Commission filed settled fraud charges against the owners of a Dallas-area Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) company, for running a fraudulent securities offering aimed at Christian investors, many of whom were affiliated with a Dallas-based private school. The Commission’s complaint, filed in Dallas federal court, alleges that Terry E. Wiese and Scott A. Wiese promised extreme returns – as much as 1,000% in a year – to entice investment in their company, Usee, Inc. Contrary to the Wieses’ claims, however, Usee had no business from which to generate any returns to investors. Instead, the Commission alleges that the Wieses wasted investor funds on poorly considered ventures or sent them to third parties about which they had little information. The Commission also alleges that the Wieses used investor funds for personal expenses and to make Ponzi payments to investors.
According to the complaint, the Wieses and Usee offered two forms of investment: stock and promissory notes. The Wieses promised returns to stock investors of up to 1,000% in the first year. Note investors were promised returns of up to 100% in 60 days. The Wieses also claimed that Usee would earn $26 billion in revenue by its fifth year of business, due to lucrative financing agreements it had arranged. According to the Commission, however, these claims were unfounded, since Usee had only nominal revenue and no financing arrangements.
The Commission alleges that the Wieses told investors that Usee was on the cusp of acquiring another VoIP company that owned valuable technology. In fact, Usee had contracted to acquire this company for $33 million, and sent the company $3 million of investor funds as a down payment. But, according the Commission, Usee and the Wieses never got close to securing funds to complete the acquisition and ultimately forfeited the funds to the other company, a fact never disclosed to investors.
Later, the Commission alleges, the Wieses released more than $1.5 million of investor funds to a company they knew nothing about, NFY Financial Consulting, PLLC. According to the SEC, NFY’s principals – Nail Yaldo and Jack Skrelja – told the Wieses the funds would be used as “proof of funds” to support unspecified “platform trading.” The Commission further alleges that, although they did little due diligence into NFY or its principals, the Wieses assured investors that the funds would be safeguarded in an escrow account and not released for any purpose. The Wieses, however, soon turned investor funds over to NFY without investors’ consent or knowledge.
The Commission has charged the Wieses and Usee with violations of Sections 5 and 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The Commission’s complaint seeks permanent injunctive relief, civil penalties and disgorgement of ill-gotten gains, with prejudgment interest. The Commission also seeks to bar the Wieses from serving as officers or directors of any public company.
To settle the Commission’s charges, the Wieses and Usee consented to permanent injunctions under Sections 5 and 17(a) of the Securities Act, Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder. Defendants further agreed to disgorge nearly $5.8 million in ill-gotten gains, with prejudgment interest, and the Wieses agreed to pay civil penalties totaling $300,000. Defendants are also permanently enjoined from offering or selling securities issued by any company they own or control and the Wieses are further barred from serving as officers or directors of any public company. The defendants did not admit or deny the SEC’s allegations.
The SEC’s action also names NFY, Yaldo and Skrelja as relief defendants for purposes of recovering the funds released to NFY. The SEC has sought an asset freeze against these parties.
USDA HAS NEW SAFEGUARDS TO PROTECT THE PUBLIC FROM FOOD-BORN ILLNESS
FROM: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
USDA Announces New Safeguards to Protect Consumers from Foodborne Illness
WASHINGTON, May 2, 2012 - The U.S. Department of Agriculture today announced a series of prevention-based policy measures that will better protect consumers from foodborne illness in meat and poultry products. These measures will significantly improve the ability of both plants and USDA to trace contaminated food materials in the supply chain, to act against contaminated products sooner, and to establish the effectiveness of food safety systems.
"The additional safeguards we are announcing today will improve our ability to prevent foodborne illness by strengthening our food safety infrastructure," said USDA Under Secretary for Food Safety Dr. Elisabeth Hagen. "Together, these measures will provide us with more tools to protect our food supply, resulting in stronger public health protections for consumers."
The policy measures include the following:
USDA's Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) intends to implement new traceback measures in order to control pathogens earlier and prevent them from triggering foodborne illnesses and outbreaks. FSIS is proposing to launch traceback investigations earlier and identify additional potentially contaminated product when the Agency finds E. coli O157:H7 through its routine sampling program. When FSIS receives an indication of contamination through presumptive positive test results for E. coli, the Agency will move quickly to identify the supplier of the product and any processors who received contaminated product from the supplier, once confirmation is received. This proposed change in policy gives FSIS the opportunity to better prevent contaminated product from reaching consumers. Learn more about the traceback proposed change in policy.
FSIS is implementing three provisions included in the Food, Conservation and Energy Act of 2008 (the 2008 Farm Bill). The new regulations, published as a Final Rule and directed by Congress, require establishments to prepare and maintain recall procedures, to notify FSIS within 24 hours that a meat or poultry product that could harm consumers has been shipped into commerce, and to document each reassessment of their hazard control and critical control point (HACCP) system food safety plans. Learn more about the Farm Bill provisions.
FSIS is announcing the availability of guidance to plants on the steps that are necessary to establish that their HACCP food safety systems will work as designed to control the food safety hazards that they confront. This process, called "validation," enables companies to ensure that their food safety systems are effective for preventing foodborne illness. This notice announces that the draft guidance document is available for comment. Learn more about HACCP validation draft guidance.
In the past two years, FSIS has announced several measures to safeguard the food supply, prevent foodborne illness, and improve consumers' knowledge about the food they eat. These initiatives support the three core principles developed by the President's Food Safety Working Group: prioritizing prevention; strengthening surveillance and enforcement; and improving response and recovery. Some of these actions include:
Performance standards for poultry establishments for continued reductions in the occurrence of pathogens. After two years of enforcing the new standards, FSIS estimates that approximately 5,000 illnesses will be prevented each year under the new Campylobacterstandards, and approximately 20,000 illnesses will be prevented under the revised Salmonella standards each year.
Zero tolerance policy for six Shiga toxin-producing E. coli (STEC) serogroups. Raw ground beef, its components, and tenderized steaks found to contain E. coli O26, O103, O45, O111, O121 or O145 will be prohibited from sale to consumers. USDA will launch a testing program to detect these dangerous pathogens and prevent them from reaching consumers.
Test and hold policy that will significantly reduce consumer exposure to unsafe meat products, should the policy become final, because products cannot be released into commerce until Agency test results for dangerous contaminants are known.
Labeling requirements that provide better information to consumers about their food by requiring nutrition information for single-ingredient raw meat and poultry products and ground or chopped products.
Public Health Information System, a modernized, comprehensive database about public health trends and food safety violations at the nearly 6,100 plants FSIS regulates.
USDA Announces New Safeguards to Protect Consumers from Foodborne Illness
WASHINGTON, May 2, 2012 - The U.S. Department of Agriculture today announced a series of prevention-based policy measures that will better protect consumers from foodborne illness in meat and poultry products. These measures will significantly improve the ability of both plants and USDA to trace contaminated food materials in the supply chain, to act against contaminated products sooner, and to establish the effectiveness of food safety systems.
"The additional safeguards we are announcing today will improve our ability to prevent foodborne illness by strengthening our food safety infrastructure," said USDA Under Secretary for Food Safety Dr. Elisabeth Hagen. "Together, these measures will provide us with more tools to protect our food supply, resulting in stronger public health protections for consumers."
The policy measures include the following:
USDA's Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) intends to implement new traceback measures in order to control pathogens earlier and prevent them from triggering foodborne illnesses and outbreaks. FSIS is proposing to launch traceback investigations earlier and identify additional potentially contaminated product when the Agency finds E. coli O157:H7 through its routine sampling program. When FSIS receives an indication of contamination through presumptive positive test results for E. coli, the Agency will move quickly to identify the supplier of the product and any processors who received contaminated product from the supplier, once confirmation is received. This proposed change in policy gives FSIS the opportunity to better prevent contaminated product from reaching consumers. Learn more about the traceback proposed change in policy.
FSIS is implementing three provisions included in the Food, Conservation and Energy Act of 2008 (the 2008 Farm Bill). The new regulations, published as a Final Rule and directed by Congress, require establishments to prepare and maintain recall procedures, to notify FSIS within 24 hours that a meat or poultry product that could harm consumers has been shipped into commerce, and to document each reassessment of their hazard control and critical control point (HACCP) system food safety plans. Learn more about the Farm Bill provisions.
FSIS is announcing the availability of guidance to plants on the steps that are necessary to establish that their HACCP food safety systems will work as designed to control the food safety hazards that they confront. This process, called "validation," enables companies to ensure that their food safety systems are effective for preventing foodborne illness. This notice announces that the draft guidance document is available for comment. Learn more about HACCP validation draft guidance.
In the past two years, FSIS has announced several measures to safeguard the food supply, prevent foodborne illness, and improve consumers' knowledge about the food they eat. These initiatives support the three core principles developed by the President's Food Safety Working Group: prioritizing prevention; strengthening surveillance and enforcement; and improving response and recovery. Some of these actions include:
Performance standards for poultry establishments for continued reductions in the occurrence of pathogens. After two years of enforcing the new standards, FSIS estimates that approximately 5,000 illnesses will be prevented each year under the new Campylobacterstandards, and approximately 20,000 illnesses will be prevented under the revised Salmonella standards each year.
Zero tolerance policy for six Shiga toxin-producing E. coli (STEC) serogroups. Raw ground beef, its components, and tenderized steaks found to contain E. coli O26, O103, O45, O111, O121 or O145 will be prohibited from sale to consumers. USDA will launch a testing program to detect these dangerous pathogens and prevent them from reaching consumers.
Test and hold policy that will significantly reduce consumer exposure to unsafe meat products, should the policy become final, because products cannot be released into commerce until Agency test results for dangerous contaminants are known.
Labeling requirements that provide better information to consumers about their food by requiring nutrition information for single-ingredient raw meat and poultry products and ground or chopped products.
Public Health Information System, a modernized, comprehensive database about public health trends and food safety violations at the nearly 6,100 plants FSIS regulates.
POLAND'S CONSTITUTION DAY
FROM: U.S. STATE DEPARTMENT
On the Occasion of Poland's Constitution Day
Press Statement Hillary Rodham Clinton
Secretary of State Washington, DC
May 3, 2012
On behalf of President Obama and the people of the United States, I am delighted to send best wishes to the people of Poland as you celebrate the 221st anniversary of your constitution this May 3.
Poland is a model of democratic transition and hope, inspiring countless advocates for freedom throughout the world. Through our NATO Alliance, nearly 2,500 Polish soldiers are serving in Afghanistan alongside soldiers from the United States and 48 other countries, all working toward the shared goal of defeating al-Qaida and strengthening the Afghan state so that Afghans can shape their own future. The United States is appreciative of the many areas of international cooperation that we share, and grateful for the role Poland plays as our protecting power in Syria.
As you celebrate Constitution Day, know that the United States continues to stand with you. We are committed to our enduring alliance and our shared values as we work together to bring peace and security throughout the globe. Best wishes for a happy Constitution Day and continued peace and prosperity in the year to come.
BIN LADEN LETTERS SHOW DESIRE TO ATTACK U.S.
FROM: AMERICAN FORCES PRESS SERVICE
Bin Laden Letters Show Desire to Attack U.S. Targets
By Cheryl Pellerin
American Forces Press Service
American Forces Press Service
WASHINGTON, May 3, 2012 – Osama bin Laden’s letters urged jihadist groups to stop domestic attacks that killed Muslim civilians and focus on the United States, “our desired goal,” says a study of declassified documents captured during last year’s U.S. raid on his compound in Pakistan.
The 59-page study titled “Letters from Abbottabad: Bin Laden Sidelined?” released online today, was written by a team of researchers the Combating Terrorism Center at West Point and supplemented with reviews and support from other experts.
The center is an independent, privately funded research and educational institution at the U.S. Military Academy that informs counterterrorism policy and strategy.
The end of the Abbottabad raid was the start of a massive analytical effort, retired Army Gen. John P. Abizaid, the center’s chairman, said in the report’s foreword, adding that experts from across the intelligence community worked to exploit the captured documents.
The letters total 175 pages in the original Arabic and 197 pages in the English translation. The earliest is dated September 2006 and the latest April 2011, the authors write, adding that some letters are incomplete or undated and not all attribute their authors or indicate an addressee.
Besides bin Laden, those who appear in the letters as authors or recipients include al-Qaida leaders Atiyyatullah and Abu Yahya al-Libi; Adam Yahya Gadahn, an American al-Qaida spokesman and media advisor; Mukhtar Abu al-Zubayr, leader of Somali militant group Harakat al-Shabab al-Mujahidin; Abu Basir, or Nasir al-Wuhayshi, leader of Yemen-based al-Qaida in the Arabian Peninsula; and Hakimullah Mahsud, leader of Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan.
“Bin Laden’s frustration with regional jihadi groups and his seeming inability to exercise control over their actions and public statements is the most compelling story to be told on the basis of the 17 declassified documents,” the report said.
Bin Laden’s public statements focused on Muslim enemies such as corrupt Muslim rulers and their Western “overseers,” the analysis said, but “the focus of his private letters is Muslims suffering at the hands of his jihadi ‘brothers.’”
The late al-Qaida chieftain also had been burdened by the incompetence of affiliate terror group, the report said, “including their lack of political acumen to win public support, their media campaigns and their poorly planned operations” that killed thousands of Muslims.
The failures of al-Qaida in Iraq worried bin Laden, who urged other groups not to repeat their mistakes. Gadahn advised al-Qaida to publicly dissociate itself from the group, the report says.
Bin Laden also worried about expansion plans of al-Qaida in the Arabian Peninsula, for example warning them not to declare an Islamic state in Yemen, and about indiscriminate attacks against Muslims by Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan, or TTP.
Such attacks “caused Atiyyatullah and Abu Yahya al-Libi to write to TTP leader Hakimullah Mahsud to express their displeasure with the group’s ‘ideology, methods and behavior,’” the report said.
The al-Qaida leaders “also threatened to take public measures ‘unless we see from you serious and immediate practical and clear steps towards reforming [your ways] and dissociating yourself from these vile mistakes [that violate Islamic Law],’” the report added.
Bin Laden withheld recognition of a February pledge of loyalty to al-Qaida by Somali rebel movement al-Shabab, the report said, fearing “that a formal merger with al-Qaida would prevent investment and foreign aid in Somalia.”
The documents released to the Combating Terrorism Center at West Point mentioned al-Qaida in the Islamic Maghreb, the Taliban and Jaysh al-Islam, but the report says the discussions “are not substantive enough to inform an understanding of the relationship between al-Qaida’s senior leaders and these groups.”
Among the documents is an April 2011 letter from bin Laden responding to the Arab Spring, which he considered a “formidable event” in the modern history of Muslims.
“This letter,” the report says, “reflected his intended strategy of responding to the new political landscape that was emerging in the Middle East and North Africa.”
In the Arab world, bin Laden wanted al-Qaida to focus its efforts on media outreach and “guidance.” He believed that a media campaign should be launched to incite “people who have not yet revolted and exhort them to rebel against the rulers,” the report said.
But he also wanted to invest, the report said, in “educating and warning Muslim people from those [who might tempt them to settle for] half solutions, such as engaging in the secular political process by forming political parties.”
In Afghanistan, bin Laden wanted jihadis to continue the fight against the United States.
Bin Laden believed their efforts, the report said, “weakened the United States, enabling Muslims elsewhere to revolt against their rulers, no longer fearing that the United States would be in a powerful position to support these rulers.”
The documents show that al-Qaida’s relationship with Iran is one of “indirect and unpleasant negotiations over the release of detained jihadis and their families, including members of bin Laden’s family,” the report said, adding that discussion about Pakistan in the documents is “scarce and inconclusive.”
REMARKS TO AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE'S NATIONAL ENERGY COMMITTEE
Photo: Wikimedia
FROM: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE
Remarks to the American Jewish Committee's National Energy Committee
Report Robert F. Cekuta
Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Economic, Energy and Business Affairs Washington, DC
May 2, 2012
Thank you, Henry, and let me thank the American Jewish Committee (AJC) very much as well for organizing this event and for offering this opportunity to talk with you about improving America’s energy security.
Since President Obama took office, U.S. domestic oil and gas production has increased each year. Our reliance on foreign oil has decreased, and that trend is expected to continue thanks in part to the historic fuel economy standards established by President Obama, effectively doubling the efficiency of the cars we drive and saving consumers thousands at the pump. In 2009, the United States produced 5.3 mmbd. Current U.S. crude production is 6.1mmbd, a figure which is equal to the production we saw at the close of 2011, when U.S. crude oil production reached its highest level since 2003. The 6.1 mmbd U.S. production figure is also an increase over 2010 levels by an estimated 120,000 barrels per day.
Another important fact: U.S. dependence on imported oil fell below 50% in 2010 for the first time in more than a decade. We have seen U.S. oil imports dropping since 2005, and net imports as a share of total consumption fell from 57 percent in 2008 to 45 percent in 2011 – the lowest level since 1995. Moreover, U.S. natural gas production grew by more than 7 percent in 2011 – the largest year-over-year volumetric increase in history – and easily eclipsed the previous production record set in 1973.
For my part this afternoon, I would like to sketch out steps which the United States is taking today to reduce these imports and to look at these steps as part of an overall effort to boost the United States’ energy security and economic well-being. After these remarks, I hope we can have some time for questions and discussions on this important foreign policy issue.
Let me first of all note something Secretary Clinton has said: “You can’t talk about our economy or foreign policy without talking about energy.”
Putting this statement into practice, the Secretary, as part of the Quadrennial Diplomacy and Development Review, established a Bureau of Energy Resources in October 2011. The Bureau is designed to unite U.S. diplomatic and programmatic efforts to build sustainable, transparent, and predictable international markets for conventional and unconventional hydrocarbons, civilian nuclear power, and electricity, to promote renewable energy, energy efficiency, and to increase access to energy and encourage good governance and transparency in the energy sector. All of these factors advance our national security interests, and those of our allies, advance our environmental goals, and advance a strong national and global economy.
The Bureau of Energy Resources takes a broad view of what is integral to U.S. and global energy security. Doing so means focusing on three areas. The first is what we have traditionally thought of as energy security, going back to the days of the Arab oil embargo and before: the flow of traditional hydrocarbons, in particular oil and gas. Hydrocarbons today still make up 85% of the world’s fuel resources. We continue to use our diplomacy to ensure that access to oil, gas, and coal is adequate, reliable, and affordable. However, we need to be aware even this
traditional aspect of energy security is changing as new markets and new technologies alter the traditional energy landscape. For example emerging market economies such as China and India are driving tremendous growth in the world’s demand for resources. New technologies – shale oil in North Dakota or the revolution in unconventional gas – and new producers, such as Brazil or countries in East and West Africa, are affecting the supply picture. The realities of climate change are also a factor.
The second focus of the Bureau of Energy Resources and its work to promote energy security is on the energy of the future. The focus here is on the opportunities that clean and renewable energy offer, whether to the United States and other established industrialized economies looking to advance their energy security and to meet the challenges posed by the realities of rising CO2 emissions and the concerns about climate change, or to other countries looking to develop or to cut their bills for imported oil.
The President has frequently cited the opportunities and benefits these technologies offer. American companies are world leaders in wind, solar, hydro, power transmission, efficient generation, and smart grids. The scale of this market is huge. The International Energy Agency estimates that the world will see $5.9 trillion – yes trillion with a “t” – in new investments in hydroelectric and other renewable power between 2011 and 2035. Those numbers come on top of the $2.8 trillion that will be invested in coal-, gas-, and oil-fired power plants around the world during those years, and $1.1 trillion in nuclear power. This shift to renewable power is market- driven and is unprecedented in history.
In this focus on the energy of the future, an important source will be boosting energy efficiency. Raising Fuel Economy Standards, for example, is part of this effort to use less energy, to use energy more wisely. Taken together, the Obama Administration’s standards for cars and light-duty trucks span model years 2011 to 2025 and represent the first meaningful update in over three decades. Under this program, average fuel efficiency will reach a performance equivalent of 54.5 miles per gallon by 2025 and will save consumers $1.7 trillion at the pump over time – or roughly $8,200 per vehicle – and reduce oil consumption by 2.2 million barrels a day by 2025.
There is a third focus in addition to the energy world that we have long known and the energy world of the future – that is the access to energy for the 1.3 billion people around the world today who do not have it. We are already seeing the effects of expanding access in those who only a few years ago had no access to energy in Brazil, China, India, or the other rapidly industrializing economies have had on global energy markets and the expectations regarding supply and demand.
Energy is an essential component for development. We often forget this, but we can see this in how and where factories and businesses first developed in the United States. The first textile and other mills were established along the Merrimack and other rivers of the Northeast because they were the source for powering machinery in the late 18th/early 19th centuries. The need for energy is core today for manufacturing, commerce, and our daily lives, but in today’s world, energy is also essential for providing health care – cold trains for vaccines or basic diagnostic equipment cannot work without electricity – or for the communications sector and how this shapes even the most basic of human activities. Think about the use of cellphones in countries around the world for fishermen to identify which port to put in with the fish they have caught or where the best markets are for their produce. But a country being a source for energy, for oil and gas, can also bring challenges, especially when the proceeds from the oil and gas sector are not used for the benefit of a country’s population.
The energy sector all too often provides great opportunities for mismanagement and corruption, and has fueled bad behavior in too many countries to name. The United States continues to be a leader in transparency, accountability, and good governance in the energy sector, and in promotion of these important values around the world. As Secretary Clinton underscored in recent testimony, the State Department will use its full diplomatic capabilities to encourage transparency in the extractive industries around the world.
To that end, as part of our overall efforts to focus attention on good governance in this sector, we have significantly increased our engagement on one critical aspect of good governance – transparency. In March I joined the EITI board on behalf of the U.S. government, elevating our engagement with that institution. The EITI has come so far in just a few short years of existence, and is quickly becoming the global standard for transparency in the extractive sector. It is providing a means for people in the countries that have signed up to see how much money their governments have earned from oil or other extractive industries. With this knowledge, the people in these countries can hold authorities accountable, and they can utilize the resulting transparency to help fight and prevent corruption.
President Obama announced last year the United States would pursue becoming an EITI compliant country, the second industrialized country after Norway to do so. However, as you also know, EITI is not the only extractive sector transparency effort the United States is undertaking. The Cardin-Lugar Amendment to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act requires companies that file reports with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission to disclose payments they make to foreign governments in the extractives sector. When the final rules are issued, we will work closely with our embassies around the world to explain to companies and governments how this law will be implemented and what it means for them. We will also engage with the European Union and others who we hope will consider similar rules. Our goal is to create a common platform for transparency across the globe.
The State Department is also working hard to help countries that are developing their energy sectors do so safely, responsibly, and accountably in all aspects. Better technology, innovative approaches, and changing economics have brought the potential for oil and gas development to new countries and regions of the world. This expansion has the potential to bring tremendous benefit to those countries, as well as to global energy markets. In order to compete in the global economy, countries – or rather the companies, entrepreneurs, academics, NGOs and governments of those countries – must understand the resources they have and how they can be exploited responsibly to the maximum benefit of their population. The State Department’s Energy Governance and Capacity Initiative (EGCI) works with emerging conventional oil and gas producers by providing technical advice and engagement on a range of
issues related to energy sector management, including legal and regulatory reform, technical capacity development, and revenue management.
This initiative supports a broad range of U.S. foreign policy objectives, including ensuring the security of global oil and gas supplies, supporting clean energy goals by maximizing the efficiency of oil and gas resource development, furthering political and economic stability in developing countries, promoting democracy and human rights, and combating corruption.
Thus, the State Department and the U.S. government as a whole is pursuing what President Obama has repeatedly stated is necessary: an all-of-the-above approach to American energy security. This all-of-the-above strategy aims at reducing our reliance on foreign oil, saving families and businesses money at the pump, and positioning the United States as the global leader in clean energy.
The United States will keep relying on responsibly produced oil and gas in the near future, but over the long term, the Obama administration is committed to a policy that allows us to transition from oil towards cleaner alternatives and energy efficiency. While there are no silver bullets for meeting our energy needs, we’ll continue to build on the progress we’ve made over the past three years. Through a sustained, all-of-the-above approach to American energy we will continue to reduce our reliance on foreign oil, and create an economy that is sound and sustainable.
The Administration has made the largest investment in clean energy in history and the United States has nearly doubled renewable energy generation since 2008. Last year, according to industry experts, the United States reclaimed the title as the world’s leading investor in clean energy technologies. Through initiatives such as the 1603 Treasury program, which partially reimburses the cost of renewable energy installations, and the Production Tax Credit (PTC), which provides a tax credit for the production of utility-scale renewable energy production, more specifically providing an income tax credit of 2.2 cents per kilowatt-hour for the production of electricity from utility-scale turbines and 1.0 cent per kilowatt-hour for bioenergy, geothermal, and efficiency upgrades to existing facilities during the first 10 years of operation, the Administration has dedicated itself to encouraging the growing clean energy economy. In addition to these tax programs, the Department of Interior has worked to make public lands accessible for renewable energy projects as well as working to improve the safety and reliability of offshore oil and gas production.
It is important to note as well that building on the $4.5 billion in Recovery Act investments in smart grid technology demonstrations and deployment, the Administration published a smart grid policy framework in June 2011 and has invested more than $150 million in smart meters, grid sensors, control systems, and other smart grid technologies in rural America.
Moreover, since October 2009, the Department of Energy (DOE) and the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) have completed energy upgrades in more than one million homes. The Department of Energy’s Weatherization Assistance Program alone has
completed energy efficiency upgrades in approximately 860,000 homes across the country. On average, these upgrades save American families more than $400 on their heating and cooling bills in the first year alone.
Let me conclude by saying that the goals and initiatives I have discussed are all part of the U.S. government’s goals of increasing global energy security and promoting economic prosperity. The steps are not just for governments; citizens and the private sector have essential roles in building a secure energy future as well. In some cases, the steps may seem mind boggling. As I noted earlier, the IEA forecasts that the world will see $5.9 trillion in new investments in hydroelectric and other renewable power, $2.8 trillion in coal, gas and oil-fired plants, and $1.1 trillion in nuclear power between 2011 and 2025. But let me also note, there are important steps we can take that do not have such huge price tags. Investing in technologies such as energy-saving light bulbs and other appliances can also help in our efforts. So can investments in new, more energy efficient technologies. The bottom-line is that energy security remains an important and basic concern, something we can all take steps to help achieve.
Thank you very much.
FROM: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE
Remarks to the American Jewish Committee's National Energy Committee
Report Robert F. Cekuta
Deputy Assistant Secretary, Bureau of Economic, Energy and Business Affairs Washington, DC
May 2, 2012
Thank you, Henry, and let me thank the American Jewish Committee (AJC) very much as well for organizing this event and for offering this opportunity to talk with you about improving America’s energy security.
Since President Obama took office, U.S. domestic oil and gas production has increased each year. Our reliance on foreign oil has decreased, and that trend is expected to continue thanks in part to the historic fuel economy standards established by President Obama, effectively doubling the efficiency of the cars we drive and saving consumers thousands at the pump. In 2009, the United States produced 5.3 mmbd. Current U.S. crude production is 6.1mmbd, a figure which is equal to the production we saw at the close of 2011, when U.S. crude oil production reached its highest level since 2003. The 6.1 mmbd U.S. production figure is also an increase over 2010 levels by an estimated 120,000 barrels per day.
Another important fact: U.S. dependence on imported oil fell below 50% in 2010 for the first time in more than a decade. We have seen U.S. oil imports dropping since 2005, and net imports as a share of total consumption fell from 57 percent in 2008 to 45 percent in 2011 – the lowest level since 1995. Moreover, U.S. natural gas production grew by more than 7 percent in 2011 – the largest year-over-year volumetric increase in history – and easily eclipsed the previous production record set in 1973.
For my part this afternoon, I would like to sketch out steps which the United States is taking today to reduce these imports and to look at these steps as part of an overall effort to boost the United States’ energy security and economic well-being. After these remarks, I hope we can have some time for questions and discussions on this important foreign policy issue.
Let me first of all note something Secretary Clinton has said: “You can’t talk about our economy or foreign policy without talking about energy.”
Putting this statement into practice, the Secretary, as part of the Quadrennial Diplomacy and Development Review, established a Bureau of Energy Resources in October 2011. The Bureau is designed to unite U.S. diplomatic and programmatic efforts to build sustainable, transparent, and predictable international markets for conventional and unconventional hydrocarbons, civilian nuclear power, and electricity, to promote renewable energy, energy efficiency, and to increase access to energy and encourage good governance and transparency in the energy sector. All of these factors advance our national security interests, and those of our allies, advance our environmental goals, and advance a strong national and global economy.
The Bureau of Energy Resources takes a broad view of what is integral to U.S. and global energy security. Doing so means focusing on three areas. The first is what we have traditionally thought of as energy security, going back to the days of the Arab oil embargo and before: the flow of traditional hydrocarbons, in particular oil and gas. Hydrocarbons today still make up 85% of the world’s fuel resources. We continue to use our diplomacy to ensure that access to oil, gas, and coal is adequate, reliable, and affordable. However, we need to be aware even this
traditional aspect of energy security is changing as new markets and new technologies alter the traditional energy landscape. For example emerging market economies such as China and India are driving tremendous growth in the world’s demand for resources. New technologies – shale oil in North Dakota or the revolution in unconventional gas – and new producers, such as Brazil or countries in East and West Africa, are affecting the supply picture. The realities of climate change are also a factor.
The second focus of the Bureau of Energy Resources and its work to promote energy security is on the energy of the future. The focus here is on the opportunities that clean and renewable energy offer, whether to the United States and other established industrialized economies looking to advance their energy security and to meet the challenges posed by the realities of rising CO2 emissions and the concerns about climate change, or to other countries looking to develop or to cut their bills for imported oil.
The President has frequently cited the opportunities and benefits these technologies offer. American companies are world leaders in wind, solar, hydro, power transmission, efficient generation, and smart grids. The scale of this market is huge. The International Energy Agency estimates that the world will see $5.9 trillion – yes trillion with a “t” – in new investments in hydroelectric and other renewable power between 2011 and 2035. Those numbers come on top of the $2.8 trillion that will be invested in coal-, gas-, and oil-fired power plants around the world during those years, and $1.1 trillion in nuclear power. This shift to renewable power is market- driven and is unprecedented in history.
In this focus on the energy of the future, an important source will be boosting energy efficiency. Raising Fuel Economy Standards, for example, is part of this effort to use less energy, to use energy more wisely. Taken together, the Obama Administration’s standards for cars and light-duty trucks span model years 2011 to 2025 and represent the first meaningful update in over three decades. Under this program, average fuel efficiency will reach a performance equivalent of 54.5 miles per gallon by 2025 and will save consumers $1.7 trillion at the pump over time – or roughly $8,200 per vehicle – and reduce oil consumption by 2.2 million barrels a day by 2025.
There is a third focus in addition to the energy world that we have long known and the energy world of the future – that is the access to energy for the 1.3 billion people around the world today who do not have it. We are already seeing the effects of expanding access in those who only a few years ago had no access to energy in Brazil, China, India, or the other rapidly industrializing economies have had on global energy markets and the expectations regarding supply and demand.
Energy is an essential component for development. We often forget this, but we can see this in how and where factories and businesses first developed in the United States. The first textile and other mills were established along the Merrimack and other rivers of the Northeast because they were the source for powering machinery in the late 18th/early 19th centuries. The need for energy is core today for manufacturing, commerce, and our daily lives, but in today’s world, energy is also essential for providing health care – cold trains for vaccines or basic diagnostic equipment cannot work without electricity – or for the communications sector and how this shapes even the most basic of human activities. Think about the use of cellphones in countries around the world for fishermen to identify which port to put in with the fish they have caught or where the best markets are for their produce. But a country being a source for energy, for oil and gas, can also bring challenges, especially when the proceeds from the oil and gas sector are not used for the benefit of a country’s population.
The energy sector all too often provides great opportunities for mismanagement and corruption, and has fueled bad behavior in too many countries to name. The United States continues to be a leader in transparency, accountability, and good governance in the energy sector, and in promotion of these important values around the world. As Secretary Clinton underscored in recent testimony, the State Department will use its full diplomatic capabilities to encourage transparency in the extractive industries around the world.
To that end, as part of our overall efforts to focus attention on good governance in this sector, we have significantly increased our engagement on one critical aspect of good governance – transparency. In March I joined the EITI board on behalf of the U.S. government, elevating our engagement with that institution. The EITI has come so far in just a few short years of existence, and is quickly becoming the global standard for transparency in the extractive sector. It is providing a means for people in the countries that have signed up to see how much money their governments have earned from oil or other extractive industries. With this knowledge, the people in these countries can hold authorities accountable, and they can utilize the resulting transparency to help fight and prevent corruption.
President Obama announced last year the United States would pursue becoming an EITI compliant country, the second industrialized country after Norway to do so. However, as you also know, EITI is not the only extractive sector transparency effort the United States is undertaking. The Cardin-Lugar Amendment to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act requires companies that file reports with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission to disclose payments they make to foreign governments in the extractives sector. When the final rules are issued, we will work closely with our embassies around the world to explain to companies and governments how this law will be implemented and what it means for them. We will also engage with the European Union and others who we hope will consider similar rules. Our goal is to create a common platform for transparency across the globe.
The State Department is also working hard to help countries that are developing their energy sectors do so safely, responsibly, and accountably in all aspects. Better technology, innovative approaches, and changing economics have brought the potential for oil and gas development to new countries and regions of the world. This expansion has the potential to bring tremendous benefit to those countries, as well as to global energy markets. In order to compete in the global economy, countries – or rather the companies, entrepreneurs, academics, NGOs and governments of those countries – must understand the resources they have and how they can be exploited responsibly to the maximum benefit of their population. The State Department’s Energy Governance and Capacity Initiative (EGCI) works with emerging conventional oil and gas producers by providing technical advice and engagement on a range of
issues related to energy sector management, including legal and regulatory reform, technical capacity development, and revenue management.
This initiative supports a broad range of U.S. foreign policy objectives, including ensuring the security of global oil and gas supplies, supporting clean energy goals by maximizing the efficiency of oil and gas resource development, furthering political and economic stability in developing countries, promoting democracy and human rights, and combating corruption.
Thus, the State Department and the U.S. government as a whole is pursuing what President Obama has repeatedly stated is necessary: an all-of-the-above approach to American energy security. This all-of-the-above strategy aims at reducing our reliance on foreign oil, saving families and businesses money at the pump, and positioning the United States as the global leader in clean energy.
The United States will keep relying on responsibly produced oil and gas in the near future, but over the long term, the Obama administration is committed to a policy that allows us to transition from oil towards cleaner alternatives and energy efficiency. While there are no silver bullets for meeting our energy needs, we’ll continue to build on the progress we’ve made over the past three years. Through a sustained, all-of-the-above approach to American energy we will continue to reduce our reliance on foreign oil, and create an economy that is sound and sustainable.
The Administration has made the largest investment in clean energy in history and the United States has nearly doubled renewable energy generation since 2008. Last year, according to industry experts, the United States reclaimed the title as the world’s leading investor in clean energy technologies. Through initiatives such as the 1603 Treasury program, which partially reimburses the cost of renewable energy installations, and the Production Tax Credit (PTC), which provides a tax credit for the production of utility-scale renewable energy production, more specifically providing an income tax credit of 2.2 cents per kilowatt-hour for the production of electricity from utility-scale turbines and 1.0 cent per kilowatt-hour for bioenergy, geothermal, and efficiency upgrades to existing facilities during the first 10 years of operation, the Administration has dedicated itself to encouraging the growing clean energy economy. In addition to these tax programs, the Department of Interior has worked to make public lands accessible for renewable energy projects as well as working to improve the safety and reliability of offshore oil and gas production.
It is important to note as well that building on the $4.5 billion in Recovery Act investments in smart grid technology demonstrations and deployment, the Administration published a smart grid policy framework in June 2011 and has invested more than $150 million in smart meters, grid sensors, control systems, and other smart grid technologies in rural America.
Moreover, since October 2009, the Department of Energy (DOE) and the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) have completed energy upgrades in more than one million homes. The Department of Energy’s Weatherization Assistance Program alone has
completed energy efficiency upgrades in approximately 860,000 homes across the country. On average, these upgrades save American families more than $400 on their heating and cooling bills in the first year alone.
Let me conclude by saying that the goals and initiatives I have discussed are all part of the U.S. government’s goals of increasing global energy security and promoting economic prosperity. The steps are not just for governments; citizens and the private sector have essential roles in building a secure energy future as well. In some cases, the steps may seem mind boggling. As I noted earlier, the IEA forecasts that the world will see $5.9 trillion in new investments in hydroelectric and other renewable power, $2.8 trillion in coal, gas and oil-fired plants, and $1.1 trillion in nuclear power between 2011 and 2025. But let me also note, there are important steps we can take that do not have such huge price tags. Investing in technologies such as energy-saving light bulbs and other appliances can also help in our efforts. So can investments in new, more energy efficient technologies. The bottom-line is that energy security remains an important and basic concern, something we can all take steps to help achieve.
Thank you very much.
U.S. DEFENSE DEPARTMENT WORKS TO CUT ENERGY COSTS
FROM: AMERICAN FORCES PRESS SERVICE
DOD Facilities Drive Technology for Secure Power
By Cheryl Pellerin
WASHINGTON, May 1, 2012 - As the nation's top energy user, the Defense Department is pushing commercialization of the technology it needs to lower costs and keep its facilities secure, the deputy undersecretary of defense for installations and environment said here today.
Dorothy Robyn addressed an audience of military, federal and industry experts at the Military Smart Grids and Microgrids Conference in Arlington, Va.
Robyn manages and oversees permanent military installations worldwide and manages installation programs that involve energy, the environment, safety and occupational health.
In fiscal 2011, the cost of electricity spent to power 300,000 buildings on Defense Department installations -- barracks, data centers, offices and hospitals -- and to operate 160,000 vehicles was $4 billion a year.
"We also account for a disproportionate share of the department's greenhouse gases," Robyn said.
And such U.S. military installations depend almost entirely on a commercial electric grid that experts say is vulnerable to disruption.
"In 2008 the Defense Science Board called us out and said, 'Your critical missions are at risk because of the potential for disruption to the grid,'" Robyn said.
Today the strategy for bolstering DOD facility energy security and innovation, she added, includes reducing demand for traditional energy, expanding the supply of renewable and other forms of on-base energy, focusing directly on base security, and leveraging advanced technology.
In the area of advanced technology, Robyn said DOD is uniquely positioned to overcome barriers to commercialization for some of the most potentially groundbreaking energy innovations. Among these are smart grids and microgrids.
A smart grid is an electrical grid whose capabilities are boosted by computer technology to monitor and regulate the energy that utilities generate and distribute to consumers.
When it becomes fully functional over the next decade in the United States, the automated grid will be able to communicate with consumers, remotely sense and fix problems on its own network, and save users money by better managing energy use, and by integrating power from wind, solar, biomass and other renewable energy sources.
Microgrids and minigrids are smaller, less-automated versions of smart-grid technology. They interconnect small, modular electricity-generation sources to low-voltage distribution systems, and some can be powered by a combination of petroleum-fueled generators, solar, wind and other sources.
"I am something of a cheerleader for microgrids, because they solve a huge problem we have -- namely the energy security of our bases," Robyn said.
But also, she added, "because I have spent much of my career working in the economics of network industries, primarily transportation and telecom, and I've seen what disruptive technology and competition have done in those sectors, and I think we're due for that in the utility sector."
Impediments to such emerging technologies, Robyn said, include a highly fragmented building industry, high costs for first users of new technology, and a lack of operational testing that deters potential technology adopters.
DOD is uniquely positioned to help overcome these barriers, the deputy undersecretary added.
"The key to this is using our installations as a testbed for next-generation energy technology, pre-commercial technology that we think has promise on our installations," Robyn said.
"We think that we have a role to play here in being a first user. It's a role that is justified by the huge infrastructure that we have -- 300,000 buildings. We look at risk differently," she added.
"If we try 10 things out and seven of them work and three don't, ... we can deploy those so broadly as to make it profitable," Robyn said. "So that's what we're doing."
Robyn's team is working on advanced technology in three areas -- smart and secure installation energy management, efficient integrated buildings, and onsite power generation.
The flagship project, she said, is in development at Twentynine Palms Marine Base, the nation's largest, in California. The smart microgrid there is capable of "islanding" about a third of the base's total load and meets DOD cyber security criteria. In islanding, a distributed generator continues to power a location even when there is no electrical grid power from the utility.
Electrochromic windows are an example of emerging technology for efficient integrated buildings. These windows can be darkened or lightened electronically, controlling the amount of daylight and solar heat gain through the windows of buildings and vehicles.
Robyn's team is putting these windows on three sides of a building at Marine Corps Air Station Miramar in Southern California and will systematically collect performance data.
"This is a great example of the role we can play in reducing risk," Robyn said.
Historically, the Energy Department has invested in this technology, but the windows are still very expensive, she noted. "And architecture and engineering firms are understandably reluctant to incorporate them into a new building without rigorous data on their performance," she said.
Collecting data from the test bed building at Miramar, she added, can help to jumpstart the market.
Many more demonstration projects are under way at DOD facilities around the country, and some are beginning to show results despite challenges that include collecting high-quality data on building energy consumption and performance and getting successfully test bed technologies widely deployed.
"I didn't list any [challenges] having to do with microgrids," Robyn said. "I feel like there is tremendous momentum there, and I don't see the kinds of [comparable] impediments."
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE, USAID AND WORLD PRESS FREEDOM DAY
FROM: U.S. STATE DEPARTMENT
Highlights of the U.S. Department of State and USAID's Efforts to Support Press and Media Freedom
Media Note Office of the Spokesperson Washington, DC
May 3, 2012
On World Press Freedom Day—and every day—the United States honors and supports media freedom at home and abroad. Press freedom is a key element of the freedom of expression, which is a foundation for other universal human rights. In 2011, the United States hosted the international World Press Freedom Day activities in Washington, D.C. This year, Assistant Secretary of State for International Organizations Esther Brimmer is leading the U.S. delegation to a World Press Freedom conference in Tunisia, May 2-6; Deputy Assistant Secretary of State Kathy Fitzpatrick of the Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor will also attend.
As a part of its "Free the Press" campaign, the Department of State is documenting on www.HumanRights.govemblematic cases of journalists living and working under threat and duress because of their efforts to exercise the freedom of expression. We call on all governments to protect the universal human right to freedom of expression.
Advancing media freedom is a regular part of U.S. diplomatic work. We advocate for freedom of expression and raise media freedom issues, including specific cases, in bilateral discussions with other governments and in multilateral bodies, including but not limited to the UN Human Rights Council, the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE), and the Organization of American States. At the OSCE, for example, the United States has been a leading voice for freedom of expression and the defense of journalists, and championed a Ministerial Declaration to support fundamental freedoms in the Digital Age.
The Department of State reports on the state of media freedom around the world—and threats to journalists—through the Country Reports on Human Rights Practices. USAID's Media Sustainability Index measures the media environment in countries in the Middle East, Africa, Europe, and Eurasia.
With support from Congress, the Department of State and USAID fund foreign assistance and exchange programs that support a free press and Internet freedom.
Foreign assistance supports the development of local and independent print, TV, radio, and online media; advocacy for legal and regulatory reform in support of media freedom and the free flow of information; general and issue-specific journalism training, including for women, youth, and marginalized groups; and security training and emergency assistance for journalists and bloggers. Since 2009, we have allocated approximately $300 million for such programs.
The Department of State's Bureau of Educational and Cultural Affairs Edward R. Murrow Program for Journalists has welcomed more than 900 rising international journalists to the United States since 2006. According to a recent report evaluating media exchanges from 2001-2006, the 1,600 journalists and media professionals who participated in various Department of State exchange programs engage in activities that promote greater press freedom once they return home, such as advocating for freedom of information; protecting journalists’ rights, and adopting new professional and ethical standards. For more information, please consult the full report or executive summary.
PENTAGON FORCE PROTECTION AGENCY TURNS TEN YEARS OLD
FROM: AMERICAN FORCES PRESS SERVICE
Photo: U.S. Navy
Agency Marks Decade of Protecting Pentagon
By Jim Garamone
WASHINGTON, May 2, 2012 - The Pentagon is a symbol of American military might, and that makes it a target that must be protected, Defense Secretary Leon E. Panetta said here today during a 10th anniversary celebration of the Pentagon Force Protection Agency.
The organization grew from the ashes of Sept. 11, 2001, when 184 people died in the terror attack on the building.
The agency secures the Pentagon and 116 other properties that make up the Pentagon reservation. "We cannot do what we do without you," Panetta told the organization's men and women at today's observance.
"I see a lot of you every day, and I know that wherever you're stationed, I always feel a lot better knowing that you are there protecting this building," he said.
Panetta noted that the observance was taking place a year and a day after 9/11's architect was killed. "Just yesterday, the nation marked one year since the operation that successfully took down Osama bin Laden," he said. "It was a day that I hope Americans take the time to thank the very dedicated intelligence and military professionals who planned and executed that raid that delivered justice to al-Qaida's leader."
Panetta was CIA director during the operation. "I have to tell you, to this day that it was a remarkable experience and one of the greatest memories in 40 years that I've been in Washington," he said. "Having the opportunity to work with the intelligence professionals, to work with Adm. Bill McRaven (then chief of the Joint Special Operations Command), to work with the SEALs in that operation was incredible. This was because of the professionalism and great dedication involved with that mission. It was the kind of stuff that makes you proud to be an American."
The men and women of the Pentagon Force Protection Agency play a vital role in ensuring the people who work at the Pentagon can accomplish their mission, Panetta said. "Your mission of protecting those that protect America is critical," he said. "Frankly, we could not do our jobs without you. It allows the roughly 23,000 employees here at the Pentagon to focus on their jobs, because they all know that there are dedicated men and women who put their lives on the line every day to protect us."
The agency grew from the Federal Protective Service and the Defense Protective Service, said Agency Director Steven Calvery. Following 9/11, the agency took a different turn, and its ranks now include law enforcement officers, physical security personnel, investigators and technicians trained to handle terrorist attacks, explosives or weapons of mass destruction. The agency provides vital protection across the board for the Pentagon.
And the building needs that protection, "because the Pentagon is much more than just an extremely large, odd-shaped building," Panetta said. "The Pentagon is a symbol. It is an unmistakable symbol of United States military power."
In the 10 years since its founding, the agency has faced down many challenges. In 2010, two officers, Jeffrey Amos and Marvin Carraway, were wounded as they shot a lone gunman who tried to break into the building. "Who knows how many casualties would have resulted if he had gained entry?" Panetta said. "Thankfully, he was stopped by the swift reaction of our brave police officers."
Officer James Feltis was another agency officer who displayed selfless service. In January 2005, he spotted a car coming the wrong way up an exit ramp, and without considering the risks, stepped out of his booth to try to stop the car. The vehicle, which had been carjacked by an armed robber, gained speed and struck Feltis, who died a month later of his injuries. He is the lone agency officer to die in the line of duty. His widow, Mary, attended the 10th anniversary celebration.
"You and your family will always be part of our defense family," Panetta told her.
Panetta thanked all members of the agency for their support and professionalism. Jonathan H. Cofer, the agency's deputy director, joined Officer Michael Marker and K-9 Officer Duke in surprising Panetta by making the secretary's dog Bravo an honorary member of the Pentagon's K-9 corps.
Photo: U.S. Navy
Agency Marks Decade of Protecting Pentagon
By Jim Garamone
WASHINGTON, May 2, 2012 - The Pentagon is a symbol of American military might, and that makes it a target that must be protected, Defense Secretary Leon E. Panetta said here today during a 10th anniversary celebration of the Pentagon Force Protection Agency.
The organization grew from the ashes of Sept. 11, 2001, when 184 people died in the terror attack on the building.
The agency secures the Pentagon and 116 other properties that make up the Pentagon reservation. "We cannot do what we do without you," Panetta told the organization's men and women at today's observance.
"I see a lot of you every day, and I know that wherever you're stationed, I always feel a lot better knowing that you are there protecting this building," he said.
Panetta noted that the observance was taking place a year and a day after 9/11's architect was killed. "Just yesterday, the nation marked one year since the operation that successfully took down Osama bin Laden," he said. "It was a day that I hope Americans take the time to thank the very dedicated intelligence and military professionals who planned and executed that raid that delivered justice to al-Qaida's leader."
Panetta was CIA director during the operation. "I have to tell you, to this day that it was a remarkable experience and one of the greatest memories in 40 years that I've been in Washington," he said. "Having the opportunity to work with the intelligence professionals, to work with Adm. Bill McRaven (then chief of the Joint Special Operations Command), to work with the SEALs in that operation was incredible. This was because of the professionalism and great dedication involved with that mission. It was the kind of stuff that makes you proud to be an American."
The men and women of the Pentagon Force Protection Agency play a vital role in ensuring the people who work at the Pentagon can accomplish their mission, Panetta said. "Your mission of protecting those that protect America is critical," he said. "Frankly, we could not do our jobs without you. It allows the roughly 23,000 employees here at the Pentagon to focus on their jobs, because they all know that there are dedicated men and women who put their lives on the line every day to protect us."
The agency grew from the Federal Protective Service and the Defense Protective Service, said Agency Director Steven Calvery. Following 9/11, the agency took a different turn, and its ranks now include law enforcement officers, physical security personnel, investigators and technicians trained to handle terrorist attacks, explosives or weapons of mass destruction. The agency provides vital protection across the board for the Pentagon.
And the building needs that protection, "because the Pentagon is much more than just an extremely large, odd-shaped building," Panetta said. "The Pentagon is a symbol. It is an unmistakable symbol of United States military power."
In the 10 years since its founding, the agency has faced down many challenges. In 2010, two officers, Jeffrey Amos and Marvin Carraway, were wounded as they shot a lone gunman who tried to break into the building. "Who knows how many casualties would have resulted if he had gained entry?" Panetta said. "Thankfully, he was stopped by the swift reaction of our brave police officers."
Officer James Feltis was another agency officer who displayed selfless service. In January 2005, he spotted a car coming the wrong way up an exit ramp, and without considering the risks, stepped out of his booth to try to stop the car. The vehicle, which had been carjacked by an armed robber, gained speed and struck Feltis, who died a month later of his injuries. He is the lone agency officer to die in the line of duty. His widow, Mary, attended the 10th anniversary celebration.
"You and your family will always be part of our defense family," Panetta told her.
Panetta thanked all members of the agency for their support and professionalism. Jonathan H. Cofer, the agency's deputy director, joined Officer Michael Marker and K-9 Officer Duke in surprising Panetta by making the secretary's dog Bravo an honorary member of the Pentagon's K-9 corps.
SCIENTISTS TO STUDY THUNDERSTORM INFLUENCE ON AIR AT HIGH ALTITUDES
Photo: Lightning Strike View From USS Lincoln, U.S. Navy
FROM: NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION
Scientists Across U.S. Launch Study of Thunderstorm Effects on Upper Atmosphere
May 1, 2012
Scientists are targeting thunderstorms in Alabama, Colorado and Oklahoma this spring to discover what happens when clouds suck air many miles into the atmosphere from Earth's surface.
The Deep Convective Clouds & Chemistry (DC3) Experiment, which begins in mid-May, will explore the influence of thunderstorms on air just beneath the stratosphere, a region that influences Earth's climate and weather patterns.
Scientists will use three research aircraft, mobile radars, lightning mapping arrays and other tools to pull together a comprehensive picture.
"We tend to associate thunderstorms with heavy rain and lightning, but they also shake things up at the top of the cloud level," says National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) scientist Chris Cantrell, a DC3 principal investigator.
"Their effects high in the atmosphere in turn have effects on climate that last long after the storm dissipates."
While past field projects have focused on thunderstorm details with only some chemistry information, or on chemistry with limited data on storms, DC3 is the first to take a comprehensive look at both chemistry and thunderstorm details, including air movement, cloud physics and electrical activity.
The scientists leading the project are from NCAR, Penn State University, Colorado State University, and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), with involvement by more than 100 researchers from 26 organizations.
Funding for DC3 is from the National Science Foundation (NSF), NOAA and NASA.
One of the key goals of DC3 is exploring the role of thunderstorms in forming upper-atmosphere ozone, a greenhouse gas that has a strong warming effect high in the atmosphere.
"The internal structure of thunderstorms and the lightning that accompanies them differs considerably across the country," says Brad Smull, director of NSF's physical and dynamic meteorology program. "That in turn affects the chemical processes inside these storms."
When thunderstorms form, air near the ground has nowhere to go but up, says NCAR scientist Mary Barth, a principal investigator on the project. "Suddenly you have an airmass at high altitude that's full of chemicals that can produce ozone."
Ozone in the upper atmosphere plays an important role in climate change by trapping significant amounts of energy from the sun.
However, ozone is difficult to track because, unlike most greenhouse gases, it is not directly emitted by either pollution sources or natural processes.
Instead, sunlight triggers interactions between pollutants such as nitrogen oxides and other gases, and those reactions create ozone.
These interactions are well understood at the Earth's surface, but have not been measured at the top of the troposphere, the lowest layer of the atmosphere just below the stratosphere.
Updrafts in thunderstorm clouds range from about 20 to 100 miles per hour, so air arrives at the top of the troposphere, about 6 to10 miles up, with its pollutants relatively intact.
The polluted airmasses don't keep rising indefinitely because of the barrier between the troposphere and stratosphere, called the tropopause.
"In the mid-latitudes, the tropopause is like a wall," says Barth. "The air bumps into it and spreads out."
The DC3 scientists will fly through these plumes to collect data as a storm is underway.
They'll fly again the next day to find the same air mass, using its distinctive chemical signature to see how it has changed over time.
Pollution isn't the only source of nitrogen oxides, the ozone precursor. Lightning strikes also produce nitrogen oxides.
"We are pretty sure lightning is the largest natural source of nitric oxide," says NOAA National Severe Storms Laboratory scientist Don MacGorman. "It is important to know the naturally occurring contribution."
The DC3 investigators are looking at three widely separated sites in northern Alabama, northeastern Colorado, and central Oklahoma to west Texas.
All three sites have existing weather instrumentation on the ground, including dual-Doppler research radars, lightning mapping arrays, and balloon launches to measure the state of the atmosphere from the ground to the stratosphere.
Scientists at each of the sites will combine data from radars with Doppler capabilities (for wind information) and polarimetric capabilities (for wind and cloud particle information) with lightning mapping arrays.
The results will improve understanding of how storms produce lightning, and of how to use lightning mapping data to improve storm forecasts and warnings.
The three research aircraft will be based at Salina Municipal Airport, Kan., a location central to all three study areas. Each day, they will fly to whichever area has the most promising forecast for thunderstorms suitable for study.
The NSF/NCAR Gulfstream V research aircraft will do the bulk of the high-altitude measurements.
Simultaneously, a NASA DC-8 will fly as low as 1,000 feet above the ground, measuring air flowing into the clouds at their bases as well as the chemistry of surrounding air.
The third research aircraft, a Dassault Falcon 20E operated by the German space agency will join DC3 for three weeks and fly especially close to storm cores at high altitudes.
The multiple sites will enable the scientists to study different types of atmospheric environments.
Alabama has more trees and thus more natural emissions; the Colorado site is sometimes downwind of Denver's pollution; the Oklahoma and west Texas site may offer clean air.
"The more different regions we can study, the more we can understand how thunderstorms affect our climate," Barth says.
Alex Pszenny, NSF program director for atmospheric chemistry, adds: "The simultaneous chemistry measurements from three of the world's most sophisticated research aircraft--combined with data from state-of-the-art radar and lightning sensor technology--will give DC3 scientists the opportunity to make major advances in understanding these chemical processes."
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)