Tuesday, August 6, 2013
SECRETARY OF DEFENSE HAGEL'S MESSAGE ON CIVILIAN FURLOUGHS
FROM: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
SECRETARY OF DEFENSE CHUCK HAGEL MESSAGE ON REDUCING CIVILIAN FURLOUGHS
When I announced my decision on May 14 to impose furloughs of up to 11 days on civilian employees to help close the budget gap caused by sequestration, I also said we would do everything possible to find the money to reduce furlough days for our people. With the end of the fiscal year next month, managers across the DoD are making final decisions necessary to ensure we make the $37 billion spending cuts mandated by sequestration, while also doing everything possible to limit damage to military readiness and our workforce. We are joined in this regard by managers in non-defense agencies who are also working to accommodate sequestration cuts while minimizing mission damage. As part of that effort at the Department of Defense, I am announcing today that, thanks to the DoD's efforts to identify savings and help from Congress, we will reduce the total numbers of furlough days for DoD civilian employees from 11 to six.
When sequestration took effect on March 1, DoD faced shortfalls of more than $30 billion in its budget for day-to-day operating costs because of sequestration and problems with wartime funding. At that point we faced the very real possibility of unpaid furloughs for civilian employees of up to 22 days.
As early as January, DoD leaders began making painful and far reaching changes to close this shortfall: civilian hiring freezes, layoffs of temporary workers, significant cuts in facilities maintenance, and more. We also sharply cut training and maintenance. The Air Force stopped flying in many squadrons, the Navy kept ships in port, and the Army cancelled training events. These actions have seriously reduced military readiness.
By early May, even after taking these steps, we still faced day-to-day budgetary shortfalls of $11 billion. At that point I decided that cutting any deeper into training and maintenance would jeopardize our core readiness mission and national security, which is why I announced furloughs of 11 days.
Hoping to be able to reduce furloughs, we submitted a large reprogramming proposal to Congress in May, asking them to let us move funds from acquisition accounts into day-to-day operating accounts. Congress approved most of this request in late July, and we are working with them to meet remaining needs. We are also experiencing less than expected costs in some areas, such as transportation of equipment out of Afghanistan. Where necessary, we have taken aggressive action to transfer funds among services and agencies. And the furloughs have saved us money.
As a result of these management initiatives, reduced costs, and reprogramming from Congress, we have determined that we can make some improvements in training and readiness and still meet the sequestration cuts. The Air Force has begun flying again in key squadrons, the Army has increased funding for organizational training at selected units, and the Navy has restarted some maintenance and ordered deployments that otherwise would not have happened. While we are still depending on furlough savings, we will be able to make up our budgetary shortfall in this fiscal year with fewer furlough days than initially announced.
This has been one of the most volatile and uncertain budget cycles the Department of Defense has ever experienced. Our fiscal planning has been conducted under a cloud of uncertainty with the imposition of sequestration and changing rules as Congress made adjustments to our spending authorities.
As we look ahead to fiscal year 2014, less than two months away, the Department of Defense still faces major fiscal challenges. If Congress does not change the Budget Control Act, DoD will be forced to cut an additional $52 billion in FY 2014, starting on October 1. This represents 40 percent more than this year's sequester-mandated cuts of $37 billion. Facing this uncertainty, I cannot be sure what will happen next year, but I want to assure our civilian employees that we will do everything possible to avoid more furloughs.
I want to thank our civilian workers for their patience and dedication during these extraordinarily tough times, and for their continued service and devotion to our department and our country. I know how difficult this has been for all of you and your families. Your contribution to national security is invaluable, and I look forward to one day putting this difficult period behind us. Thank you and God Bless you and your families.
SECRETARY OF DEFENSE CHUCK HAGEL MESSAGE ON REDUCING CIVILIAN FURLOUGHS
When I announced my decision on May 14 to impose furloughs of up to 11 days on civilian employees to help close the budget gap caused by sequestration, I also said we would do everything possible to find the money to reduce furlough days for our people. With the end of the fiscal year next month, managers across the DoD are making final decisions necessary to ensure we make the $37 billion spending cuts mandated by sequestration, while also doing everything possible to limit damage to military readiness and our workforce. We are joined in this regard by managers in non-defense agencies who are also working to accommodate sequestration cuts while minimizing mission damage. As part of that effort at the Department of Defense, I am announcing today that, thanks to the DoD's efforts to identify savings and help from Congress, we will reduce the total numbers of furlough days for DoD civilian employees from 11 to six.
When sequestration took effect on March 1, DoD faced shortfalls of more than $30 billion in its budget for day-to-day operating costs because of sequestration and problems with wartime funding. At that point we faced the very real possibility of unpaid furloughs for civilian employees of up to 22 days.
As early as January, DoD leaders began making painful and far reaching changes to close this shortfall: civilian hiring freezes, layoffs of temporary workers, significant cuts in facilities maintenance, and more. We also sharply cut training and maintenance. The Air Force stopped flying in many squadrons, the Navy kept ships in port, and the Army cancelled training events. These actions have seriously reduced military readiness.
By early May, even after taking these steps, we still faced day-to-day budgetary shortfalls of $11 billion. At that point I decided that cutting any deeper into training and maintenance would jeopardize our core readiness mission and national security, which is why I announced furloughs of 11 days.
Hoping to be able to reduce furloughs, we submitted a large reprogramming proposal to Congress in May, asking them to let us move funds from acquisition accounts into day-to-day operating accounts. Congress approved most of this request in late July, and we are working with them to meet remaining needs. We are also experiencing less than expected costs in some areas, such as transportation of equipment out of Afghanistan. Where necessary, we have taken aggressive action to transfer funds among services and agencies. And the furloughs have saved us money.
As a result of these management initiatives, reduced costs, and reprogramming from Congress, we have determined that we can make some improvements in training and readiness and still meet the sequestration cuts. The Air Force has begun flying again in key squadrons, the Army has increased funding for organizational training at selected units, and the Navy has restarted some maintenance and ordered deployments that otherwise would not have happened. While we are still depending on furlough savings, we will be able to make up our budgetary shortfall in this fiscal year with fewer furlough days than initially announced.
This has been one of the most volatile and uncertain budget cycles the Department of Defense has ever experienced. Our fiscal planning has been conducted under a cloud of uncertainty with the imposition of sequestration and changing rules as Congress made adjustments to our spending authorities.
As we look ahead to fiscal year 2014, less than two months away, the Department of Defense still faces major fiscal challenges. If Congress does not change the Budget Control Act, DoD will be forced to cut an additional $52 billion in FY 2014, starting on October 1. This represents 40 percent more than this year's sequester-mandated cuts of $37 billion. Facing this uncertainty, I cannot be sure what will happen next year, but I want to assure our civilian employees that we will do everything possible to avoid more furloughs.
I want to thank our civilian workers for their patience and dedication during these extraordinarily tough times, and for their continued service and devotion to our department and our country. I know how difficult this has been for all of you and your families. Your contribution to national security is invaluable, and I look forward to one day putting this difficult period behind us. Thank you and God Bless you and your families.
TWO SENTENCED FOR DUMPING TONS OF ASBESTOS IN VIOLATION OF CLEAN WATER ACT
FROM: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Friday, August 2, 2013
Two Sentenced in New York State for Dumping Thousands of Tons of Asbestos in Violation of the Clean Water Act
Two individuals, Donald Torriero and Julius DeSimone, were sentenced in federal court in Utica, N.Y., for illegally dumping thousands of tons of asbestos-contaminated construction debris on a 28-acre piece of property on the Mohawk River in upstate New York, the Justice Department announced.
U.S. District Judge David N. Hurd sentenced Torriero to serve 36 months in prison followed by three years of supervised release. Torriero was immediately remanded into custody of the U.S. Marshals. DeSimone was sentenced to five years’ probation, including six months of home confinement. Both were ordered to pay $492,000 in restitution for, among other things, cleanup expenses at the site.
The two pleaded guilty to conspiring to violate the Clean Water Act, the Superfund statute, wire fraud and to defrauding the United States. In addition, Torriero pleaded guilty to substantive wire fraud charges, and DeSimone was convicted of making false statements to law enforcement in connection with a fabricated "permit letter" the conspirators created and used to dump at the site.
According to the evidence, Torriero, DeSimone and others conspired to fill in the entire property over the course of five years with pulverized construction and demolition debris that was processed at New Jersey solid waste management facilities and then transported to open property in Frankfort, N.Y. The plot was uncovered by law enforcement just months after the operation began, but not before the conspirators had already dumped at least 400 truckloads of debris at the site. Much of the material that was dumped was placed in and around waters of the United States and some of the material was found to be contaminated with asbestos. The conspirators then concealed the illegal dumping and recruited others to join in the illegal dumping by fabricating a New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) permit and forged the name of a DEC official on the fraudulent permit.
“Torriero and DeSimone endangered the health of both their fellow citizens and sensitive wetlands by violating numerous laws meant to ensure the proper disposal of toxic materials. They also committed other criminal acts in their attempts to cover up their misdeeds,” stated Acting Assistant Attorney General Robert Dreher of the Justice Department’s Environment and Natural Resources Division. “Holding these men responsible for their criminal activities will serve as notice to others involved in similar schemes that the Justice Department will not tolerate such flagrant disregard for the law and the environment.”
“Asbestos can cause cancer and other serious respiratory diseases; there is no safe level of exposure to it,” said Vernesa Jones-Allen, Acting Special Agent in Charge of EPA’s Criminal Investigation Division in New York. “The defendants in this case conspired to illegally dispose asbestos containing material. This case demonstrates that the American people will not tolerate those who make money by breaking the law and damage the environment.”
“This case demonstrates the commitment of local, state and federal law enforcement agencies to work together to protect the environment and the health of the citizens we serve,” said Richard S. Hartunian, U.S. Attorney for the Northern District of New York. “I commend all the law enforcement officers involved in this case for their hard work in bringing Torriero and DeSimone to justice.”
“The disposal of hazardous materials is closely regulated in New York State to protect public health and our environment,” said New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) Commissioner Joe Martens. “The forgery of permits by the defendants in this case was a blatant and potentially dangerous criminal act that undermined the integrity of the permit system. I applaud the collaborative work of DEC investigators and partners to halt this illegal dumping, apprehend the perpetrators, and bring them to justice.”
This case is related to the guilty pleas and sentencings associated with Eagle Recycling, Mazza & Sons Inc., Dominick Mazza, Cross Nicastro and Jon Deck. Mr. Deck is the last remaining individual awaiting sentencing.
This case was investigated by the New York State Environmental Conservation Police, Bureau of Environmental Crimes, EPA’s Criminal Investigation Division, Internal Revenue Service, New Jersey State Police Office of Business Integrity Unit, New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, and Ohio Department of Environmental Protection. The case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Craig A. Benedict of the Northern District of New York, and Trial Attorneys Todd W. Gleason and Gary Donner of the Environmental Crimes Section of the Justice Department’s Environment and Natural Resources Division.
Friday, August 2, 2013
Two Sentenced in New York State for Dumping Thousands of Tons of Asbestos in Violation of the Clean Water Act
Two individuals, Donald Torriero and Julius DeSimone, were sentenced in federal court in Utica, N.Y., for illegally dumping thousands of tons of asbestos-contaminated construction debris on a 28-acre piece of property on the Mohawk River in upstate New York, the Justice Department announced.
U.S. District Judge David N. Hurd sentenced Torriero to serve 36 months in prison followed by three years of supervised release. Torriero was immediately remanded into custody of the U.S. Marshals. DeSimone was sentenced to five years’ probation, including six months of home confinement. Both were ordered to pay $492,000 in restitution for, among other things, cleanup expenses at the site.
The two pleaded guilty to conspiring to violate the Clean Water Act, the Superfund statute, wire fraud and to defrauding the United States. In addition, Torriero pleaded guilty to substantive wire fraud charges, and DeSimone was convicted of making false statements to law enforcement in connection with a fabricated "permit letter" the conspirators created and used to dump at the site.
According to the evidence, Torriero, DeSimone and others conspired to fill in the entire property over the course of five years with pulverized construction and demolition debris that was processed at New Jersey solid waste management facilities and then transported to open property in Frankfort, N.Y. The plot was uncovered by law enforcement just months after the operation began, but not before the conspirators had already dumped at least 400 truckloads of debris at the site. Much of the material that was dumped was placed in and around waters of the United States and some of the material was found to be contaminated with asbestos. The conspirators then concealed the illegal dumping and recruited others to join in the illegal dumping by fabricating a New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) permit and forged the name of a DEC official on the fraudulent permit.
“Torriero and DeSimone endangered the health of both their fellow citizens and sensitive wetlands by violating numerous laws meant to ensure the proper disposal of toxic materials. They also committed other criminal acts in their attempts to cover up their misdeeds,” stated Acting Assistant Attorney General Robert Dreher of the Justice Department’s Environment and Natural Resources Division. “Holding these men responsible for their criminal activities will serve as notice to others involved in similar schemes that the Justice Department will not tolerate such flagrant disregard for the law and the environment.”
“Asbestos can cause cancer and other serious respiratory diseases; there is no safe level of exposure to it,” said Vernesa Jones-Allen, Acting Special Agent in Charge of EPA’s Criminal Investigation Division in New York. “The defendants in this case conspired to illegally dispose asbestos containing material. This case demonstrates that the American people will not tolerate those who make money by breaking the law and damage the environment.”
“This case demonstrates the commitment of local, state and federal law enforcement agencies to work together to protect the environment and the health of the citizens we serve,” said Richard S. Hartunian, U.S. Attorney for the Northern District of New York. “I commend all the law enforcement officers involved in this case for their hard work in bringing Torriero and DeSimone to justice.”
“The disposal of hazardous materials is closely regulated in New York State to protect public health and our environment,” said New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) Commissioner Joe Martens. “The forgery of permits by the defendants in this case was a blatant and potentially dangerous criminal act that undermined the integrity of the permit system. I applaud the collaborative work of DEC investigators and partners to halt this illegal dumping, apprehend the perpetrators, and bring them to justice.”
This case is related to the guilty pleas and sentencings associated with Eagle Recycling, Mazza & Sons Inc., Dominick Mazza, Cross Nicastro and Jon Deck. Mr. Deck is the last remaining individual awaiting sentencing.
This case was investigated by the New York State Environmental Conservation Police, Bureau of Environmental Crimes, EPA’s Criminal Investigation Division, Internal Revenue Service, New Jersey State Police Office of Business Integrity Unit, New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, and Ohio Department of Environmental Protection. The case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Craig A. Benedict of the Northern District of New York, and Trial Attorneys Todd W. Gleason and Gary Donner of the Environmental Crimes Section of the Justice Department’s Environment and Natural Resources Division.
READOUT: SECRETARY HAGEL'S CALL WITH EGYPTIAN DEFENSE MINISTER GENERAL AL-SISI
FROM: U.S. DEFENSE DEPARTMENT
Readout of Secretary Hagel's Call with Egyptian Defense Minister Gen. Abdul Fatah al-Sisi
Pentagon Press Secretary George Little issued the following readout:
"Secretary Hagel spoke with his Egyptian counterpart, Defense Gen. Abdul Fatah Al-Sisi this afternoon via telephone.
"Secretary Hagel and Minister Al-Sisi discussed progress in U.S. and EU mediation efforts led by Deputy Secretary of State Bill Burns and EU Special Representative Bernadino Leon.
"Minister Al-Sisi underscored his commitment to peaceful resolution of the ongoing protests, and thanked Secretary Hagel for U.S. support.
"Minister Al-Sisi affirmed the commitment of the interim civilian government to an inclusive political roadmap for all Egyptians."
Readout of Secretary Hagel's Call with Egyptian Defense Minister Gen. Abdul Fatah al-Sisi
Pentagon Press Secretary George Little issued the following readout:
"Secretary Hagel spoke with his Egyptian counterpart, Defense Gen. Abdul Fatah Al-Sisi this afternoon via telephone.
"Secretary Hagel and Minister Al-Sisi discussed progress in U.S. and EU mediation efforts led by Deputy Secretary of State Bill Burns and EU Special Representative Bernadino Leon.
"Minister Al-Sisi underscored his commitment to peaceful resolution of the ongoing protests, and thanked Secretary Hagel for U.S. support.
"Minister Al-Sisi affirmed the commitment of the interim civilian government to an inclusive political roadmap for all Egyptians."
READOUT OF SECRETARY HAGEL'S MEETING WITH AZERBAIJAN'S MINISTER OF DEFENSE
FROM: U.S. DEFENSE DEPARTMENT
Readout of Secretary Hagel's Meeting with Azerbaijan's Minister of Defense Safar Abiyev
Pentagon Press Secretary George Little provided the following readout:
"Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel met with Azerbaijan's Minister of Defense Safar Abiyev today at the Pentagon.
"Secretary Hagel praised Azerbaijan for its support to efforts in Afghanistan, to include their sustained deployment with the International Security Assistance Force. In addition, he thanked Minister Abiyev for the valuable role Azerbaijan plays in providing ground, air and sea transit access for logistical support to Afghanistan.
"The two leaders agreed to continue to work together on issues to include North Atlantic Treaty Organization interoperability, counterterrorism, defense transformation and maritime security.
"Secretary Hagel and Minister Abiyev also discussed the regional situation. Secretary Hagel raised the recent inauguration of Iranian President Hassan Rouhani and reiterated that it is imperative that Iran take quick steps to resolve the international community's deep concerns over its nuclear program.
"Secretary Hagel recognizes Azerbaijan's role in fostering regional security and stability, and he looks forward to continuing the strategic partnership."
Readout of Secretary Hagel's Meeting with Azerbaijan's Minister of Defense Safar Abiyev
Pentagon Press Secretary George Little provided the following readout:
"Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel met with Azerbaijan's Minister of Defense Safar Abiyev today at the Pentagon.
"Secretary Hagel praised Azerbaijan for its support to efforts in Afghanistan, to include their sustained deployment with the International Security Assistance Force. In addition, he thanked Minister Abiyev for the valuable role Azerbaijan plays in providing ground, air and sea transit access for logistical support to Afghanistan.
"The two leaders agreed to continue to work together on issues to include North Atlantic Treaty Organization interoperability, counterterrorism, defense transformation and maritime security.
"Secretary Hagel and Minister Abiyev also discussed the regional situation. Secretary Hagel raised the recent inauguration of Iranian President Hassan Rouhani and reiterated that it is imperative that Iran take quick steps to resolve the international community's deep concerns over its nuclear program.
"Secretary Hagel recognizes Azerbaijan's role in fostering regional security and stability, and he looks forward to continuing the strategic partnership."
SEC CHARGES FORMER OFFICERS AND INVESTOR IN DEFUNCT COMPANY FOR ROLES IN PENNY STOCK SCHEME
FROM: U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SEC Charges Former Officers and Investor in Houston Company in Fraudulent Penny Stock Scheme
The Securities and Exchange Commission today charged two former officers of now-defunct PGI Energy, Inc., as well as an investor in the company, for their roles in a fraudulent penny stock scheme to issue purportedly unrestricted PGI Energy shares in the public markets.
The SEC's complaint, filed in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas, alleges that starting in 2011, PGI Energy's former Chief Investment Officer Robert Gandy and former CEO and Chairman Marcellous McZeal engaged in a scheme that included creating false promissory notes, signing misleading certifications, and altering the company's balance sheet to cause its transfer agent to issue millions of PGI Energy common stock shares without restrictive legends. The SEC also charged investor Alvin Ausbon for his role in the scheme, which included signing false promissory notes and diverting proceeds from the sale of PGI Energy stock back to the company and Gandy.
Gandy is also the CEO of Houston-based Pythagoras Group, which purports to be an "investment banking firm." McZeal is an attorney licensed in Texas. The complaint alleges that Gandy and McZeal made material misstatements and provided false documents to attorneys and a transfer agent who relied on them to conclude that PGI Energy shares could be issued without restrictive legends. The SEC alleges that Gandy and McZeal backdated promissory notes that purported to memorialize debt supposedly owed by PGI Energy and a prior business venture. They also are alleged to have added false debt to PGI Energy's balance sheet, and signed bogus "gift" letters and certifications of non-shell status, all in an effort to get unrestricted, free-trading PGI Energy shares unlawfully released into the market. Ausbon is charged with furthering the scheme by signing bogus promissory notes and remitting proceeds from the sale of PGI Energy shares back to the company and Gandy.
According to the complaint, the scheme collapsed in February 2012 when the SEC ordered a temporary suspension of trading in PGI Energy's securities, due to questions regarding the accuracy and adequacy of the company's representations in press releases and other public statements.
The SEC's complaint charges all defendants with violating Sections 5 and 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 (Securities Act) and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act) and Rule 10b-5 thereunder. The complaint seeks permanent injunctions, disgorgement plus prejudgment interest, a financial penalty, and penny stock bars against all three defendants and officer and director bars against Gandy and McZeal.
Without admitting or denying the allegations in the SEC's complaint, McZeal has consented to the entry of a final judgment enjoining him from future violations of Sections 5 and 17(a) of the Securities Act and Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 thereunder. He has also agreed to pay disgorgement plus prejudgment interest thereon of $19,919.37 and a civil penalty of $70,000. In addition, McZeal has agreed to permanent officer and director and penny stock bars. This settlement is subject to court approval. Subject to final settlement of the district court proceeding, McZeal has also agreed to the institution of a settled administrative proceeding pursuant to Rule 102(e) of the SEC's Rules of Practice, pursuant to which he would be barred from appearing before the SEC as an attorney.
SEC Charges Former Officers and Investor in Houston Company in Fraudulent Penny Stock Scheme
The Securities and Exchange Commission today charged two former officers of now-defunct PGI Energy, Inc., as well as an investor in the company, for their roles in a fraudulent penny stock scheme to issue purportedly unrestricted PGI Energy shares in the public markets.
The SEC's complaint, filed in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas, alleges that starting in 2011, PGI Energy's former Chief Investment Officer Robert Gandy and former CEO and Chairman Marcellous McZeal engaged in a scheme that included creating false promissory notes, signing misleading certifications, and altering the company's balance sheet to cause its transfer agent to issue millions of PGI Energy common stock shares without restrictive legends. The SEC also charged investor Alvin Ausbon for his role in the scheme, which included signing false promissory notes and diverting proceeds from the sale of PGI Energy stock back to the company and Gandy.
Gandy is also the CEO of Houston-based Pythagoras Group, which purports to be an "investment banking firm." McZeal is an attorney licensed in Texas. The complaint alleges that Gandy and McZeal made material misstatements and provided false documents to attorneys and a transfer agent who relied on them to conclude that PGI Energy shares could be issued without restrictive legends. The SEC alleges that Gandy and McZeal backdated promissory notes that purported to memorialize debt supposedly owed by PGI Energy and a prior business venture. They also are alleged to have added false debt to PGI Energy's balance sheet, and signed bogus "gift" letters and certifications of non-shell status, all in an effort to get unrestricted, free-trading PGI Energy shares unlawfully released into the market. Ausbon is charged with furthering the scheme by signing bogus promissory notes and remitting proceeds from the sale of PGI Energy shares back to the company and Gandy.
According to the complaint, the scheme collapsed in February 2012 when the SEC ordered a temporary suspension of trading in PGI Energy's securities, due to questions regarding the accuracy and adequacy of the company's representations in press releases and other public statements.
The SEC's complaint charges all defendants with violating Sections 5 and 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 (Securities Act) and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act) and Rule 10b-5 thereunder. The complaint seeks permanent injunctions, disgorgement plus prejudgment interest, a financial penalty, and penny stock bars against all three defendants and officer and director bars against Gandy and McZeal.
Without admitting or denying the allegations in the SEC's complaint, McZeal has consented to the entry of a final judgment enjoining him from future violations of Sections 5 and 17(a) of the Securities Act and Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 thereunder. He has also agreed to pay disgorgement plus prejudgment interest thereon of $19,919.37 and a civil penalty of $70,000. In addition, McZeal has agreed to permanent officer and director and penny stock bars. This settlement is subject to court approval. Subject to final settlement of the district court proceeding, McZeal has also agreed to the institution of a settled administrative proceeding pursuant to Rule 102(e) of the SEC's Rules of Practice, pursuant to which he would be barred from appearing before the SEC as an attorney.
VAN ALLEN SPEED
FROM: LOS ALAMOS NATIONAL LABORATORY
Van Allen Probes Pinpoint Driver of Speeding Electrons
Research team solves decades-old mystery that threatens satellites
LOS ALAMOS, N.M., July 25, 2013—Researchers believe they have solved a lingering mystery about how electrons within Earth’s radiation belt can suddenly become energetic enough to kill orbiting satellites. Thanks to data gathered from an intrepid pair of NASA probes roaming the harsh space environment within the Van Allen radiation belts, scientists have identified an internal electron accelerator operating within the belts.
"For years we thought the Van Allen belts were pretty well behaved and changed slowly," said Geoffrey Reeves of Los Alamos National Laboratory’s Intelligence and Space Research Division. "With more measurements, however, we realized how quickly and unpredictably the radiation belts change, and now we have real evidence that the changes originate from within the belts themselves."
In a paper released today in Science Express, Reeves and colleagues from the University of New Hampshire, University of Colorado at Boulder, NASA Goddard Flight Center, Aerospace Corporation, University of California-Los Angeles, and University of Iowa, describe a mechanism by which electrons suddenly accelerate to fantastic speeds within the Van Allen belts— a pair of donut shaped zones of charged particles that surround Earth and occupy the inner region of our planet’s Magnetosphere.
Traveling at 99 percent the speed of light, the super-fast electrons are among the speediest particles naturally produced by Earth, and have energies so high that they can penetrate and destroy satellite components. The research paves the way for scientists to possibly predict hazardous space weather and allow satellite operators to potentially prepare for the ravages of sudden space storms.
The radiation belts, named after their discoverer, James Van Allen, are comprised of an outer region of extremely high-energy electrons, with an inner region of energetic protons and electrons. The belts have been studied extensively since the dawn of the Space Age, because the high-energy particles in the outer ring can cripple or disrupt spacecraft. Long-term observation of the belts have hinted that the belts can act as efficient and powerful particle accelerators; recent observations by the Van Allen Probes (formerly known as the Radiation Belt Storm Probes)—a pair of spacecraft launched in August 2012—now seem to confirm this.
On October 9, 2012, while flying through the radiation belts, the Van Allen Probes measured a sudden, nearly thousand-fold increase in the energy of electrons within the outer belt. The rapid increase came on the heels of a period of waning energies the week before. The October 9 event mimicked an observed, but poorly understood event measured in 1997 by another spacecraft. Ever since the 1997 event, scientists have pondered whether the increase in electron energy was the result of forces outside of the belts, a mechanism known as "radial acceleration," or from forces within the belts, known as "local acceleration." Data from the Van Allen Probes seems to put this question to rest.
Because the twin Van Allen Probes follow each other and cut through the belts at different times, researchers were able to see that the October 9 increase originated from within the heart of the belts, indicative of local acceleration. The data also showed that higher electron fluxes did not move from a region outside of the belts slowly toward our planet, a detail corroborated by other geosynchronous satellites located outside of the belts.
"In the October 9, 2012, event, all of the acceleration took place in about 12 hours," said Reeves, a space physicist and principal author of the Science paper. "With previous measurement, a satellite might have only been able to fly through such an event once and not get a chance to witness the changes actually happening."
The researchers are now trying to understand exactly how the acceleration took place. Right now, the team believes that electromagnetic radio waves somehow excite the electrons into a higher-energy state, much like a microwave oven excites and heats water molecules. Members of the team are looking hard at waves known as "Chorus Waves" that are often observed in the region of the belts where the local acceleration was strongest. Chorus Waves are a type of electromagnetic radio wave with frequencies within the range of human hearing. Chorus Waves provide a haunting cacophony like a flock of extraterrestrial birds.
"We don’t know whether it is Chorus Waves or some other type of electromagnetic wave that’s behind the electron acceleration we are seeing," said Reeves, "but the Van Allen Probes are also equipped with instruments that should help us figure that out as well. Each of these discoveries take us a step closer to the goal of forecasting these extreme space weather events and making space safer for satellites."
Van Allen Probes Pinpoint Driver of Speeding Electrons
Research team solves decades-old mystery that threatens satellites
LOS ALAMOS, N.M., July 25, 2013—Researchers believe they have solved a lingering mystery about how electrons within Earth’s radiation belt can suddenly become energetic enough to kill orbiting satellites. Thanks to data gathered from an intrepid pair of NASA probes roaming the harsh space environment within the Van Allen radiation belts, scientists have identified an internal electron accelerator operating within the belts.
"For years we thought the Van Allen belts were pretty well behaved and changed slowly," said Geoffrey Reeves of Los Alamos National Laboratory’s Intelligence and Space Research Division. "With more measurements, however, we realized how quickly and unpredictably the radiation belts change, and now we have real evidence that the changes originate from within the belts themselves."
In a paper released today in Science Express, Reeves and colleagues from the University of New Hampshire, University of Colorado at Boulder, NASA Goddard Flight Center, Aerospace Corporation, University of California-Los Angeles, and University of Iowa, describe a mechanism by which electrons suddenly accelerate to fantastic speeds within the Van Allen belts— a pair of donut shaped zones of charged particles that surround Earth and occupy the inner region of our planet’s Magnetosphere.
Traveling at 99 percent the speed of light, the super-fast electrons are among the speediest particles naturally produced by Earth, and have energies so high that they can penetrate and destroy satellite components. The research paves the way for scientists to possibly predict hazardous space weather and allow satellite operators to potentially prepare for the ravages of sudden space storms.
The radiation belts, named after their discoverer, James Van Allen, are comprised of an outer region of extremely high-energy electrons, with an inner region of energetic protons and electrons. The belts have been studied extensively since the dawn of the Space Age, because the high-energy particles in the outer ring can cripple or disrupt spacecraft. Long-term observation of the belts have hinted that the belts can act as efficient and powerful particle accelerators; recent observations by the Van Allen Probes (formerly known as the Radiation Belt Storm Probes)—a pair of spacecraft launched in August 2012—now seem to confirm this.
On October 9, 2012, while flying through the radiation belts, the Van Allen Probes measured a sudden, nearly thousand-fold increase in the energy of electrons within the outer belt. The rapid increase came on the heels of a period of waning energies the week before. The October 9 event mimicked an observed, but poorly understood event measured in 1997 by another spacecraft. Ever since the 1997 event, scientists have pondered whether the increase in electron energy was the result of forces outside of the belts, a mechanism known as "radial acceleration," or from forces within the belts, known as "local acceleration." Data from the Van Allen Probes seems to put this question to rest.
Because the twin Van Allen Probes follow each other and cut through the belts at different times, researchers were able to see that the October 9 increase originated from within the heart of the belts, indicative of local acceleration. The data also showed that higher electron fluxes did not move from a region outside of the belts slowly toward our planet, a detail corroborated by other geosynchronous satellites located outside of the belts.
"In the October 9, 2012, event, all of the acceleration took place in about 12 hours," said Reeves, a space physicist and principal author of the Science paper. "With previous measurement, a satellite might have only been able to fly through such an event once and not get a chance to witness the changes actually happening."
The researchers are now trying to understand exactly how the acceleration took place. Right now, the team believes that electromagnetic radio waves somehow excite the electrons into a higher-energy state, much like a microwave oven excites and heats water molecules. Members of the team are looking hard at waves known as "Chorus Waves" that are often observed in the region of the belts where the local acceleration was strongest. Chorus Waves are a type of electromagnetic radio wave with frequencies within the range of human hearing. Chorus Waves provide a haunting cacophony like a flock of extraterrestrial birds.
"We don’t know whether it is Chorus Waves or some other type of electromagnetic wave that’s behind the electron acceleration we are seeing," said Reeves, "but the Van Allen Probes are also equipped with instruments that should help us figure that out as well. Each of these discoveries take us a step closer to the goal of forecasting these extreme space weather events and making space safer for satellites."
Monday, August 5, 2013
USDA'S ONGOING EFFORTS TO ASSIST DROUGHT IMPACTED RANCHERS
FROM: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
USDA Announces Ongoing Efforts to Assist Ranchers Impacted by Drought
WASHINGTON, Aug. 5, 2013 - As severe drought conditions persist in certain regions throughout the country, the U.S. Department of Agriculture's (USDA) Farm Service Agency (FSA) Administrator Juan M. Garcia today announced temporary assistance to livestock producers through FSA's Conservation Reserve Program (CRP). Under limited conditions, farmers and ranchers affected by drought will be allowed to use certain additional CRP acres for haying or grazing under emergency conditions while maintaining safeguards to the conservation and wildlife benefits provided by CRP. In addition, USDA announced that the reduction to CRP annual rental payments related to emergency haying or grazing will be reduced from 25 percent to 10 percent. Further, the sale of hay will be allowed under certain conditions. These measures take into consideration the quality losses of the hay and will provide needed assistance to livestock producers.
"Beginning today, state FSA offices are authorized, under limited conditions, to expand opportunities for haying and grazing on certain additional lands enrolled in CRP," said Garcia. "This local approach provides both the appropriate flexibility and ability to tailor safeguards specific to regional conditions. States must adhere to specific guidelines to ensure that additional haying and grazing still maintains the important environmental and wildlife benefits of CRP. These safeguards will be determined through consultation with the state conservationist, state fish and wildlife agency and stakeholders that comprise the state technical committee."
CRP is a voluntary program that provides producers annual rental payments on their land in exchange for planting resource-conserving vegetation on cropland to help prevent erosion, provide wildlife habitat and improve the environment. CRP acres enrolled under certain practices can already be used for emergency haying and grazing during natural disasters to provide much-needed feed to livestock. FSA state offices have already opened haying, grazing or both in 432 counties in response to natural disaster this year.
Given the continued multi-year drought in some regions, forage for livestock is already substantially reduced. The action today will allow lands that are not typically eligible for emergency haying and grazing to be used with appropriate protections to maintain the CRP environmental and wildlife benefits. The expanded haying and grazing will only be allowed following the local primary nesting season, which already has passed in many areas. Especially sensitive lands such as stream buffers are generally not eligible.
FSA also has taken action under the Emergency Conservation Program to authorize additional expenditures related to drought response to be eligible for cost share, including connection to rural water systems and installation of permanent pipelines. In addition, given the limited budgetary resources and better long term benefits, FSA has increased the maximum cost share rates for permanent practices relative to temporary measures.
FSA encourages all farmers and ranchers to contact their local USDA Farm Service Agency Service Center to report damage to crops or livestock loss. In addition, USDA reminds livestock producers to keep thorough records of losses, including additional expenses for such things as feed purchased due to lost supplies.
USDA Announces Ongoing Efforts to Assist Ranchers Impacted by Drought
WASHINGTON, Aug. 5, 2013 - As severe drought conditions persist in certain regions throughout the country, the U.S. Department of Agriculture's (USDA) Farm Service Agency (FSA) Administrator Juan M. Garcia today announced temporary assistance to livestock producers through FSA's Conservation Reserve Program (CRP). Under limited conditions, farmers and ranchers affected by drought will be allowed to use certain additional CRP acres for haying or grazing under emergency conditions while maintaining safeguards to the conservation and wildlife benefits provided by CRP. In addition, USDA announced that the reduction to CRP annual rental payments related to emergency haying or grazing will be reduced from 25 percent to 10 percent. Further, the sale of hay will be allowed under certain conditions. These measures take into consideration the quality losses of the hay and will provide needed assistance to livestock producers.
"Beginning today, state FSA offices are authorized, under limited conditions, to expand opportunities for haying and grazing on certain additional lands enrolled in CRP," said Garcia. "This local approach provides both the appropriate flexibility and ability to tailor safeguards specific to regional conditions. States must adhere to specific guidelines to ensure that additional haying and grazing still maintains the important environmental and wildlife benefits of CRP. These safeguards will be determined through consultation with the state conservationist, state fish and wildlife agency and stakeholders that comprise the state technical committee."
CRP is a voluntary program that provides producers annual rental payments on their land in exchange for planting resource-conserving vegetation on cropland to help prevent erosion, provide wildlife habitat and improve the environment. CRP acres enrolled under certain practices can already be used for emergency haying and grazing during natural disasters to provide much-needed feed to livestock. FSA state offices have already opened haying, grazing or both in 432 counties in response to natural disaster this year.
Given the continued multi-year drought in some regions, forage for livestock is already substantially reduced. The action today will allow lands that are not typically eligible for emergency haying and grazing to be used with appropriate protections to maintain the CRP environmental and wildlife benefits. The expanded haying and grazing will only be allowed following the local primary nesting season, which already has passed in many areas. Especially sensitive lands such as stream buffers are generally not eligible.
FSA also has taken action under the Emergency Conservation Program to authorize additional expenditures related to drought response to be eligible for cost share, including connection to rural water systems and installation of permanent pipelines. In addition, given the limited budgetary resources and better long term benefits, FSA has increased the maximum cost share rates for permanent practices relative to temporary measures.
FSA encourages all farmers and ranchers to contact their local USDA Farm Service Agency Service Center to report damage to crops or livestock loss. In addition, USDA reminds livestock producers to keep thorough records of losses, including additional expenses for such things as feed purchased due to lost supplies.
JUSTICE DEPARTMENT SUBMITTED REMEDY TO SETTLE E-BOOK PRICE-FIXING CASE
FROM: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE
Remedy Would Require Apple to Terminate Agreements with Five Publishers; Provide for a Court-Appointed External Monitor; Allow Competitors to Provide Links from Their E-Book Apps to Their E-Bookstores
WASHINGTON — The Department of Justice and 33 State Attorneys General today submitted to the court a proposed remedy to address Apple Inc.’s illegal conduct, following the July 10, 2013, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York decision finding that Apple conspired to fix the prices of e-books in the United States. The proposed relief is intended to halt Apple’s anticompetitive conduct, restore lost competition and prevent a recurrence of the illegal activities.
“The court found that Apple’s illegal conduct deprived consumers of the benefits of e-book price competition and forced them to pay substantially higher prices,” said Bill Baer, Assistant Attorney General in charge of the Department of Justice’s Antitrust Division. “Under the department’s proposed order, Apple’s illegal conduct will cease and Apple and its senior executives will be prevented from conspiring to thwart competition in the future.”
The department's proposal, if approved by the court, will require Apple to terminate its existing agreements with the five major publishers with which it conspired – Hachette Book Group (USA), HarperCollins Publishers L.L.C., Holtzbrinck Publishers LLC, which does business as Macmillan, Penguin Group (USA) Inc. and Simon & Schuster Inc. – and to refrain for five years from entering new e-book distribution contracts which would restrain Apple from competing on price. Under the department’s proposed remedy, Apple will be prohibited from again serving as a conduit of information among the conspiring publishers or from retaliating against publishers for refusing to sell e-books on agency terms. Apple will also be prohibited from entering into agreements with suppliers of e-books, music, movies, television shows or other content that are likely to increase the prices at which Apple’s competitor retailers may sell that content. To reset competition to the conditions that existed before the conspiracy, Apple must also for two years allow other e-book retailers like Amazon and Barnes & Noble to provide links from their e-book apps to their e-bookstores, allowing consumers who purchase and read e-books on their iPads and iPhones easily to compare Apple’s prices with those of its competitors.
Additionally, the Department of Justice is asking the court to appoint an external monitor to ensure that Apple's internal antitrust compliance policies are sufficient to catch anticompetitive activities before they result in harm to consumers. The monitor, whose salary and expenses will be paid by Apple, will work with an internal antitrust compliance officer who will be hired by and report exclusively to the outside directors comprising Apple’s audit committee. The antitrust compliance officer will be responsible for training Apple’s senior executives and other employees about the antitrust laws and ensuring that Apple abides by the relief ordered by the court.
On April 11, 2012, the department filed a civil antitrust lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York against Apple, Hachette, HarperCollins, Macmillan, Penguin and Simon & Schuster, for conspiring to end e-book retailers' freedom to compete on price by taking control of pricing from e-book retailers and substantially increasing the prices that consumers paid for e-books.
At the same time that it filed the lawsuit, the department reached settlements with three of the publishers – Hachette, HarperCollins and Simon & Schuster. Those settlements were approved by the court in September 2012. The department settled with Penguin on Dec. 18, 2012, and with Macmillan on Feb. 8, 2013. The Penguin settlement was approved by the court in May 2013. Final approval of the Macmillan settlement is pending before the court. Under the settlements, each publisher was required to terminate agreements that prevented e-book retailers from lowering the prices at which they sell e-books to consumers and to allow for retail price competition in renegotiated e-book distribution agreements.
The department's trial against Apple, which was overseen by Judge Denise Cote, began on June 3, 2013. The trial lasted for three weeks, with closing arguments taking place on June 20, 2013. The court issued its opinion that Apple Inc. violated Section 1 of the Sherman Act on July 10, 2013. The court will hold a hearing on remedies on Aug. 9, 2013.
Remedy Would Require Apple to Terminate Agreements with Five Publishers; Provide for a Court-Appointed External Monitor; Allow Competitors to Provide Links from Their E-Book Apps to Their E-Bookstores
WASHINGTON — The Department of Justice and 33 State Attorneys General today submitted to the court a proposed remedy to address Apple Inc.’s illegal conduct, following the July 10, 2013, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York decision finding that Apple conspired to fix the prices of e-books in the United States. The proposed relief is intended to halt Apple’s anticompetitive conduct, restore lost competition and prevent a recurrence of the illegal activities.
“The court found that Apple’s illegal conduct deprived consumers of the benefits of e-book price competition and forced them to pay substantially higher prices,” said Bill Baer, Assistant Attorney General in charge of the Department of Justice’s Antitrust Division. “Under the department’s proposed order, Apple’s illegal conduct will cease and Apple and its senior executives will be prevented from conspiring to thwart competition in the future.”
The department's proposal, if approved by the court, will require Apple to terminate its existing agreements with the five major publishers with which it conspired – Hachette Book Group (USA), HarperCollins Publishers L.L.C., Holtzbrinck Publishers LLC, which does business as Macmillan, Penguin Group (USA) Inc. and Simon & Schuster Inc. – and to refrain for five years from entering new e-book distribution contracts which would restrain Apple from competing on price. Under the department’s proposed remedy, Apple will be prohibited from again serving as a conduit of information among the conspiring publishers or from retaliating against publishers for refusing to sell e-books on agency terms. Apple will also be prohibited from entering into agreements with suppliers of e-books, music, movies, television shows or other content that are likely to increase the prices at which Apple’s competitor retailers may sell that content. To reset competition to the conditions that existed before the conspiracy, Apple must also for two years allow other e-book retailers like Amazon and Barnes & Noble to provide links from their e-book apps to their e-bookstores, allowing consumers who purchase and read e-books on their iPads and iPhones easily to compare Apple’s prices with those of its competitors.
Additionally, the Department of Justice is asking the court to appoint an external monitor to ensure that Apple's internal antitrust compliance policies are sufficient to catch anticompetitive activities before they result in harm to consumers. The monitor, whose salary and expenses will be paid by Apple, will work with an internal antitrust compliance officer who will be hired by and report exclusively to the outside directors comprising Apple’s audit committee. The antitrust compliance officer will be responsible for training Apple’s senior executives and other employees about the antitrust laws and ensuring that Apple abides by the relief ordered by the court.
On April 11, 2012, the department filed a civil antitrust lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York against Apple, Hachette, HarperCollins, Macmillan, Penguin and Simon & Schuster, for conspiring to end e-book retailers' freedom to compete on price by taking control of pricing from e-book retailers and substantially increasing the prices that consumers paid for e-books.
At the same time that it filed the lawsuit, the department reached settlements with three of the publishers – Hachette, HarperCollins and Simon & Schuster. Those settlements were approved by the court in September 2012. The department settled with Penguin on Dec. 18, 2012, and with Macmillan on Feb. 8, 2013. The Penguin settlement was approved by the court in May 2013. Final approval of the Macmillan settlement is pending before the court. Under the settlements, each publisher was required to terminate agreements that prevented e-book retailers from lowering the prices at which they sell e-books to consumers and to allow for retail price competition in renegotiated e-book distribution agreements.
The department's trial against Apple, which was overseen by Judge Denise Cote, began on June 3, 2013. The trial lasted for three weeks, with closing arguments taking place on June 20, 2013. The court issued its opinion that Apple Inc. violated Section 1 of the Sherman Act on July 10, 2013. The court will hold a hearing on remedies on Aug. 9, 2013.
SATELLITE VIEW OF LOW PRESSURE SYSTEM OFF SOUTHEAST COAST OF AUSTRALIA
FROM: NASA
In late July 2013, a low pressure system off Australia’s southeast coast and moist onshore winds combined to create unsettled weather across central Australia – and a striking image of a broad cloud band across the stark winter landscape. The Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) aboard NASA’s Terra satellite captured this true-color image on July 22 at 01:05 UTC (10:35 a.m. Australian Central Standard Time). To the west of the low pressure trough the skies are clear and dry. To the east, the broad band of bright white clouds obscures the landscape. The system brought wind, precipitation and cooler temperatures to the region. Image Credit: NASA/Jeff Schmaltz, MODIS Land Rapid Response Team, NASA GSFC
LABOR DEPARTMENT OBTAINS INJUNCTION AGAINST PENSION PLAN FIDUCIARIES
FROM: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
US Labor Department obtains preliminary injunction against Kentucky-based plan fiduciaries, alleging improper use of retirement funds
LEXINGTON, Ky. — The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky on July 26 granted in part the U.S. Department of Labor's motion for a preliminary injunction against George S. Hofmeister and Bernard Tew, former fiduciaries of four Lexington-based pension plans: the Hillsdale Salaried, Hillsdale Hourly, Revstone Casting Fairfield GMP Local 359, and Fourslides Inc.
The department previously filed lawsuits in the same court that named Hofmeister and Tew, among others. Hofmeister was the trustee of the four pension plans, and Tew was managing director of their investment service provider, Bluegrass Investment Management LLC. The court's order removes Hofmeister as a fiduciary of the plans and prohibits him from taking any actions with respect to the pensions plans or their assets. Tew resigned as fiduciary of the plans a few days before a hearing regarding the department's motion.
The lawsuits alleged that the defendants engaged in a series of prohibited transactions resulting in the misuse of approximately $12.1 million from the Hillsdale Salaried pension plan, approximately $22.5 million from the Hillsdale Hourly pension plan, approximately $4.4 million from the Revstone Casting Fairfield GMP Local 359 pension plan, and approximately $500,000 from the Fourslides Inc. pension plan. The four plan sponsors are closely affiliated with Lexington-based Revstone Industries LLC and Spara LLC.
"Those entrusted with managing these pension funds have shown an utter disregard for the workers, who are relying on the money for their retirement," said Phyllis C. Borzi, the assistant secretary of labor who heads the Employee Benefits Security Administration. "Our aim is to make this right for those workers."
The suits follow an EBSA investigation that found violations of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, including prohibited loans to related companies, prohibited use of plan assets for the purchase and lease of employer property, prohibited purchase of customer notes from affiliated companies, prohibited transfer of assets in favor of parties-in-interest, payment of excessive fees to services providers, and payment of fees on behalf of the companies.
According to the brief filed on behalf of the department by the Cleveland Regional Solicitor's Office, Hofmeister, Tew and Bluegrass have repeatedly violated ERISA, using nearly $40 million in pension plan assets to benefit themselves or related parties.
The department's investigation of these pension plans revealed a pattern of prohibited transactions involving the use of these plans' assets by Hofmeister, Tew and investment adviser firms. Alleged improper use of the plans' assets began within days or months of Hofmeister assuming control of the pension plans. The department contends that Hofmeister has placed millions of dollars in pension plan assets at risk and has consistently failed to act to protect these assets when required.
The court has appointed Fiduciary Counselors Inc. to administer the four pension plans. Fiduciary Counselors is an investment adviser firm in Washington, D.C., that has extensive experience acting as an independent fiduciary for employee benefit plans.
US Labor Department obtains preliminary injunction against Kentucky-based plan fiduciaries, alleging improper use of retirement funds
LEXINGTON, Ky. — The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky on July 26 granted in part the U.S. Department of Labor's motion for a preliminary injunction against George S. Hofmeister and Bernard Tew, former fiduciaries of four Lexington-based pension plans: the Hillsdale Salaried, Hillsdale Hourly, Revstone Casting Fairfield GMP Local 359, and Fourslides Inc.
The department previously filed lawsuits in the same court that named Hofmeister and Tew, among others. Hofmeister was the trustee of the four pension plans, and Tew was managing director of their investment service provider, Bluegrass Investment Management LLC. The court's order removes Hofmeister as a fiduciary of the plans and prohibits him from taking any actions with respect to the pensions plans or their assets. Tew resigned as fiduciary of the plans a few days before a hearing regarding the department's motion.
The lawsuits alleged that the defendants engaged in a series of prohibited transactions resulting in the misuse of approximately $12.1 million from the Hillsdale Salaried pension plan, approximately $22.5 million from the Hillsdale Hourly pension plan, approximately $4.4 million from the Revstone Casting Fairfield GMP Local 359 pension plan, and approximately $500,000 from the Fourslides Inc. pension plan. The four plan sponsors are closely affiliated with Lexington-based Revstone Industries LLC and Spara LLC.
"Those entrusted with managing these pension funds have shown an utter disregard for the workers, who are relying on the money for their retirement," said Phyllis C. Borzi, the assistant secretary of labor who heads the Employee Benefits Security Administration. "Our aim is to make this right for those workers."
The suits follow an EBSA investigation that found violations of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act, including prohibited loans to related companies, prohibited use of plan assets for the purchase and lease of employer property, prohibited purchase of customer notes from affiliated companies, prohibited transfer of assets in favor of parties-in-interest, payment of excessive fees to services providers, and payment of fees on behalf of the companies.
According to the brief filed on behalf of the department by the Cleveland Regional Solicitor's Office, Hofmeister, Tew and Bluegrass have repeatedly violated ERISA, using nearly $40 million in pension plan assets to benefit themselves or related parties.
The department's investigation of these pension plans revealed a pattern of prohibited transactions involving the use of these plans' assets by Hofmeister, Tew and investment adviser firms. Alleged improper use of the plans' assets began within days or months of Hofmeister assuming control of the pension plans. The department contends that Hofmeister has placed millions of dollars in pension plan assets at risk and has consistently failed to act to protect these assets when required.
The court has appointed Fiduciary Counselors Inc. to administer the four pension plans. Fiduciary Counselors is an investment adviser firm in Washington, D.C., that has extensive experience acting as an independent fiduciary for employee benefit plans.
FLORIDA RESIDENT CHARGED WITH UNREGISTERED SALES OF SECURITIES
FROM: SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SEC Charges Florida Resident with Unregistered Sales of Securities
On July 23, 2013, the Securities and Exchange Commission filed settled charges against Florida resident Jorge Bravo, Jr., for unlawful sales of millions of shares of a microcap company to the public without complying with the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933.
According to the SEC's complaint filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, from April 2009 until May 2010, Bravo unlawfully sold approximately 93 million shares of stock of AVVAA World Health Care Products, Inc. in unregistered transactions for proceeds of approximately $523,000. The complaint alleges that Bravo obtained the shares through three "wrap around agreements." The wrap around agreements involved debts that AVVAA supposedly owed to its officers, affiliates, or other persons closely associated with the company ("Affiliates") for unpaid compensation for services rendered. Under the wrap around agreements, the Affiliates assigned to Bravo the debts that AVVAA purportedly owed to them, and AVVAA consented to the assignment and agreed to modify the terms of the original debt obligation so that the debts now owed to Bravo were immediately convertible into shares of AVVAA common stock. According to the complaint, within weeks of entering into the first two agreements, and approximately four months after the execution of the third, Bravo began selling the shares he obtained under the agreements to the public. He then used some of the proceeds of the stock sales to pay the amounts owed to the Affiliates under the wrap around agreements. The complaint further alleges that Bravo had previously been involved in wrap around agreements, in his capacity as of president and chief executive of Cross Atlantic Commodities, Inc., a public company located in Weston, Florida, and that those wrap around agreements were subjects of a prior Commission enforcement action, SEC v. K&L International Enterprises, Inc., 6:09-cv-1638-GAP-KRS (M.D. Fla. Sept. 24, 2009). Bravo was not charged in that matter.
Without admitting or denying the SEC's allegations, Bravo agreed to settle the case against him by consenting to the entry of a final judgment permanently enjoining him from future violations of Sections 5(a) and 5(c) of the Securities Act; permanently enjoining him from participating in any offering of penny stock; and requiring him to pay disgorgement of $ 392,000, the amount of his ill-gotten gains, plus prejudgment interest of $ 53,866 and a civil penalty in the amount of $150,000. The settlement must be approved by the court.
The SEC's investigation was conducted by New York Regional Office Enforcement staff Karen Lee, Christopher Ferrante, and Leslie Kazon. The Commission acknowledges the assistance of FINRA, the British Columbia Securities Commission, and the Ontario Securities Commission in this matter.
SEC Charges Florida Resident with Unregistered Sales of Securities
On July 23, 2013, the Securities and Exchange Commission filed settled charges against Florida resident Jorge Bravo, Jr., for unlawful sales of millions of shares of a microcap company to the public without complying with the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933.
According to the SEC's complaint filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, from April 2009 until May 2010, Bravo unlawfully sold approximately 93 million shares of stock of AVVAA World Health Care Products, Inc. in unregistered transactions for proceeds of approximately $523,000. The complaint alleges that Bravo obtained the shares through three "wrap around agreements." The wrap around agreements involved debts that AVVAA supposedly owed to its officers, affiliates, or other persons closely associated with the company ("Affiliates") for unpaid compensation for services rendered. Under the wrap around agreements, the Affiliates assigned to Bravo the debts that AVVAA purportedly owed to them, and AVVAA consented to the assignment and agreed to modify the terms of the original debt obligation so that the debts now owed to Bravo were immediately convertible into shares of AVVAA common stock. According to the complaint, within weeks of entering into the first two agreements, and approximately four months after the execution of the third, Bravo began selling the shares he obtained under the agreements to the public. He then used some of the proceeds of the stock sales to pay the amounts owed to the Affiliates under the wrap around agreements. The complaint further alleges that Bravo had previously been involved in wrap around agreements, in his capacity as of president and chief executive of Cross Atlantic Commodities, Inc., a public company located in Weston, Florida, and that those wrap around agreements were subjects of a prior Commission enforcement action, SEC v. K&L International Enterprises, Inc., 6:09-cv-1638-GAP-KRS (M.D. Fla. Sept. 24, 2009). Bravo was not charged in that matter.
Without admitting or denying the SEC's allegations, Bravo agreed to settle the case against him by consenting to the entry of a final judgment permanently enjoining him from future violations of Sections 5(a) and 5(c) of the Securities Act; permanently enjoining him from participating in any offering of penny stock; and requiring him to pay disgorgement of $ 392,000, the amount of his ill-gotten gains, plus prejudgment interest of $ 53,866 and a civil penalty in the amount of $150,000. The settlement must be approved by the court.
The SEC's investigation was conducted by New York Regional Office Enforcement staff Karen Lee, Christopher Ferrante, and Leslie Kazon. The Commission acknowledges the assistance of FINRA, the British Columbia Securities Commission, and the Ontario Securities Commission in this matter.
Sunday, August 4, 2013
SECRETARY OF STATE KERRY'S STATEMENT ON THE ELECTION IN ZIMBABWE
FROM: U.S. STATE DEPARTMENT
Zimbabwe's Presidential Election
Press Statement
John Kerry
Secretary of State
Washington, DC
August 3, 2013
Zimbabweans voted in their country’s first national elections this week since the violent and disputed polls in 2008. These elections were an opportunity for Zimbabwe to move forward on a democratic path and provide a foundation for growth and prosperity.
The people of Zimbabwe should be commended for rejecting violence and showing their commitment to the democratic process. But make no mistake: in light of substantial electoral irregularities reported by domestic and regional observers, the United States does not believe that the results announced today represent a credible expression of the will of the Zimbabwean people.
Though the United States was restricted from monitoring these elections, the balance of evidence indicates that today’s announcement was the culmination of a deeply flawed process. There were irregularities in the provision and composition of the voters roll. The parties had unequal access to state media. The security sector did not safeguard the electoral process on an even-handed basis. And the government failed to implement the political reforms mandated by Zimbabwe’s new constitution, the Global Political Agreement, and the region.
We urge the Southern African Development Community and the African Union to address their concerns with the electoral process, as well as those raised by domestic monitoring groups. The Government of Zimbabwe needs to chart a way forward that will give the people of Zimbabwe the opportunity to express their most fundamental democratic right in a free and fair environment. We further call on all parties to refrain from violence during this period.
The United States shares the same fundamental interests as the Zimbabwean people: a peaceful, democratic, prosperous Zimbabwe that reflects the will of its people and provides opportunities for them to flourish. For that to happen, the Government of Zimbabwe should heed the voices of its citizens and implement the democratic reforms mandated by the country’s new constitution.
Only then will Zimbabwe truly embark on a path towards democracy that reflects the aspirations of its people.
Zimbabwe's Presidential Election
Press Statement
John Kerry
Secretary of State
Washington, DC
August 3, 2013
Zimbabweans voted in their country’s first national elections this week since the violent and disputed polls in 2008. These elections were an opportunity for Zimbabwe to move forward on a democratic path and provide a foundation for growth and prosperity.
The people of Zimbabwe should be commended for rejecting violence and showing their commitment to the democratic process. But make no mistake: in light of substantial electoral irregularities reported by domestic and regional observers, the United States does not believe that the results announced today represent a credible expression of the will of the Zimbabwean people.
Though the United States was restricted from monitoring these elections, the balance of evidence indicates that today’s announcement was the culmination of a deeply flawed process. There were irregularities in the provision and composition of the voters roll. The parties had unequal access to state media. The security sector did not safeguard the electoral process on an even-handed basis. And the government failed to implement the political reforms mandated by Zimbabwe’s new constitution, the Global Political Agreement, and the region.
We urge the Southern African Development Community and the African Union to address their concerns with the electoral process, as well as those raised by domestic monitoring groups. The Government of Zimbabwe needs to chart a way forward that will give the people of Zimbabwe the opportunity to express their most fundamental democratic right in a free and fair environment. We further call on all parties to refrain from violence during this period.
The United States shares the same fundamental interests as the Zimbabwean people: a peaceful, democratic, prosperous Zimbabwe that reflects the will of its people and provides opportunities for them to flourish. For that to happen, the Government of Zimbabwe should heed the voices of its citizens and implement the democratic reforms mandated by the country’s new constitution.
Only then will Zimbabwe truly embark on a path towards democracy that reflects the aspirations of its people.
DOD RECRUITING AND RETENTION NUMBERS FOR FISCAL 2013
FROM: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
DOD Announces Recruiting and Retention Numbers for Fiscal 2013, Through June 2013
The Department of Defense announced today recruiting and retention statistics for the active and reserve components for fiscal 2013, through June.
Active Component.
Recruiting. All four active services met or exceeded their numerical accession goals for fiscal 2013, through June.
• Army – 49,273 accessions, with a goal of 48,690; 101 percent
• Navy – 28,482 accessions, with a goal of 28,482; 100 percent
• Marine Corps – 21,001 accessions, with a goal of 20,960; 100 percent
• Air Force – 20,154 accessions, with a goal of 20,154; 100 percent
Retention. The Army, Air Force, and Marine Corps exhibited strong retention numbers for the ninth month of fiscal 2013. The Navy exhibited strong retention numbers in the mid-career and career categories. However, the Navy's achievement of 89 percent in the initial category relates to reduced accessions from four to six years ago.
Reserve Component.
Recruiting. Five of the six reserve components met or exceeded their fiscal-year-to-date 2013 numerical accession goals. The Army Reserve finished June 2,572 accessions short of its goal.
• Army National Guard – 38,002 accessions, with a goal of 37,669; 101 percent
• Army Reserve – 19,779 accessions, with a goal of 22,351; 88 percent
• Navy Reserve – 4,138 accessions, with a goal of 4,138; 100 percent
• Marine Corps Reserve – 6,891 accessions, with a goal of 6,804; 101 percent
• Air National Guard – 7,788 accessions, with a goal of 7,788; 100 percent
• Air Force Reserve – 5,515 accessions, with a goal of 4,835; 114 percent
Attrition – All Reserve Components have met their attrition goals. Current trends are expected to continue. (This indicator lags by one month due to data availability.)
DOD Announces Recruiting and Retention Numbers for Fiscal 2013, Through June 2013
The Department of Defense announced today recruiting and retention statistics for the active and reserve components for fiscal 2013, through June.
Active Component.
Recruiting. All four active services met or exceeded their numerical accession goals for fiscal 2013, through June.
• Army – 49,273 accessions, with a goal of 48,690; 101 percent
• Navy – 28,482 accessions, with a goal of 28,482; 100 percent
• Marine Corps – 21,001 accessions, with a goal of 20,960; 100 percent
• Air Force – 20,154 accessions, with a goal of 20,154; 100 percent
Retention. The Army, Air Force, and Marine Corps exhibited strong retention numbers for the ninth month of fiscal 2013. The Navy exhibited strong retention numbers in the mid-career and career categories. However, the Navy's achievement of 89 percent in the initial category relates to reduced accessions from four to six years ago.
Reserve Component.
Recruiting. Five of the six reserve components met or exceeded their fiscal-year-to-date 2013 numerical accession goals. The Army Reserve finished June 2,572 accessions short of its goal.
• Army National Guard – 38,002 accessions, with a goal of 37,669; 101 percent
• Army Reserve – 19,779 accessions, with a goal of 22,351; 88 percent
• Navy Reserve – 4,138 accessions, with a goal of 4,138; 100 percent
• Marine Corps Reserve – 6,891 accessions, with a goal of 6,804; 101 percent
• Air National Guard – 7,788 accessions, with a goal of 7,788; 100 percent
• Air Force Reserve – 5,515 accessions, with a goal of 4,835; 114 percent
Attrition – All Reserve Components have met their attrition goals. Current trends are expected to continue. (This indicator lags by one month due to data availability.)
TELEMARKETER BANNED FROM SELLING DEBT RELIEF SERVICES
FROM: FEDERAL TRADING COMMISSION
FTC Settlement Bans Marketer from Selling Debt Relief Services, Telemarketing, and Robocalling
Under a settlement with the Federal Trade Commission, a telemarketer who allegedly defrauded consumers with false promises of debt relief and charged them without their consent is banned from selling debt relief services, telemarketing, and making robocalls.
The settlement resolves a complaint the FTC filed last year against Jeremy R. Nelson and four companies he controlled. The agency alleged that they violated federal law by making false claims, causing unauthorized debits from consumers’ bank accounts, and illegally charging advance fees.
The FTC also alleged that the defendants called phone numbers on the National Do Not Call Registry, called consumers who had told them not to call, failed to transmit caller identification to consumers’ caller ID service, delivered pre-recorded messages without prior written consent, repeatedly called consumers to annoy them, and delivered pre-recorded messages that failed to identify the seller, the call’s purpose, and the product or service.
In addition to the ban on debt relief sales, telemarketing, and robocalls, the proposed settlement order permanently prohibits the defendants from misrepresenting material facts about any products and services, making unsubstantiated claims, charging consumers’ accounts without their express informed consent, collecting money from customers who agreed to purchase debt relief products or services from the defendants, selling or otherwise benefitting from consumers’ personal information, and failing to properly dispose of customer information.
The order imposes a judgment of more than $4.6 million against the defendants. The judgment against Nelson will be suspended, based on his inability to pay, after he surrenders to the FTC bank accounts and investment assets frozen by the court. The full judgment will become due immediately if he is found to have misrepresented his financial condition.
For information on dealing with debt, read the FTC’s Knee Deep In Debt.
The Commission vote authorizing the staff to file the proposed consent order was 4-0. The consent order was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California.
NOTE: Consent orders have the force of law when approved and signed by the District Court judge.
FTC Settlement Bans Marketer from Selling Debt Relief Services, Telemarketing, and Robocalling
Under a settlement with the Federal Trade Commission, a telemarketer who allegedly defrauded consumers with false promises of debt relief and charged them without their consent is banned from selling debt relief services, telemarketing, and making robocalls.
The settlement resolves a complaint the FTC filed last year against Jeremy R. Nelson and four companies he controlled. The agency alleged that they violated federal law by making false claims, causing unauthorized debits from consumers’ bank accounts, and illegally charging advance fees.
The FTC also alleged that the defendants called phone numbers on the National Do Not Call Registry, called consumers who had told them not to call, failed to transmit caller identification to consumers’ caller ID service, delivered pre-recorded messages without prior written consent, repeatedly called consumers to annoy them, and delivered pre-recorded messages that failed to identify the seller, the call’s purpose, and the product or service.
In addition to the ban on debt relief sales, telemarketing, and robocalls, the proposed settlement order permanently prohibits the defendants from misrepresenting material facts about any products and services, making unsubstantiated claims, charging consumers’ accounts without their express informed consent, collecting money from customers who agreed to purchase debt relief products or services from the defendants, selling or otherwise benefitting from consumers’ personal information, and failing to properly dispose of customer information.
The order imposes a judgment of more than $4.6 million against the defendants. The judgment against Nelson will be suspended, based on his inability to pay, after he surrenders to the FTC bank accounts and investment assets frozen by the court. The full judgment will become due immediately if he is found to have misrepresented his financial condition.
For information on dealing with debt, read the FTC’s Knee Deep In Debt.
The Commission vote authorizing the staff to file the proposed consent order was 4-0. The consent order was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California.
NOTE: Consent orders have the force of law when approved and signed by the District Court judge.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)