Saturday, June 21, 2014

SECRETARY KERRY'S REMARKS AT PACIFIC DAY POLICY SEMINAR

FROM:  THE STATE DEPARTMENT 

Remarks at Pacific Day Policy Seminar

Remarks
John Kerry
Secretary of State
Embassy of New Zealand
Washington, DC
June 18, 2014


I’m going for the whole thing.  Sorry about that, folks.  Well, good evening, everybody.  How are you all?  Everybody good?  What a fantastic evening, and it’s a great, great pleasure for me to be able to come over here and share Pacific Day.  Tonight, we celebrate – obviously or this evening, I can still say – the critical relationships that unites all of the nations of the Pacific.  And believe me, in the last few days at our conference, we’ve seen the power of how united the Pacific region is.
So we thank you because these partnerships were born out of a world that put us together geographically because we border on the Pacific, but it has also put us together because we have weathered wars and we have developed together and built a shared prosperity.

So I want to thank Palau’s ambassador, Hersey Kyota, who invited me to come speak.  I particularly want to thank New Zealand’s Ambassador, Michael Moore, for hosting us.  I think we all want to join together in saying thank you for his willingness us to do that.  (Applause.)  Oh, where is he?  Hiding?  (Applause.)

I want to recognize New Zealand’s prime minister who is here – he’s hiding over here, right here – John Key.  Thank you so much, Mr. Prime Minister.  It’s an honor to be here.  (Applause.)  And I’m going to be meeting with him tomorrow, where we can discuss some of the issues that we’ll talk about here. 

I also am honored to be here with the president of Palau, Tommy Remengesau.  And we also met.  We had a wonderful opportunity to talk about a host of issues, but most importantly the way in which island nations are deeply threatened by climate change, rising sea levels, acidification, overfishing.  And all of these were the topics of the conference that we just had in the last few days.

I want to just emphasize to everybody, America thinks of itself as a Pacific nation and is a Pacific nation proudly.  We don’t just border it and have an extraordinary coastline framing the Pacific, but we have been in the Pacific and in its far reaches for centuries.  We also obviously went through an extraordinarily difficult period during World War II.  We shed a lot of blood in the Pacific and fought hard for the ability of Pacific nations to be free to determine their own future and certainly to be able to associate and come together to protect the freedom of navigation, the freedom of commerce, and our rights as human beings.

And one of those rights is the right to be free from pollution that literally threatens nations.  That is why President Obama made the strategic decision in the first term, to do what has become known as a rebalance or pivot, but I prefer a rebalance, because pivot implies we’re somehow turning away from something else and we’re not.  But we’re rebalancing so that we make certain that some people in the Pacific understand our commitment and can rely on the presence of the United States with respect to many of those issues that I just talked about. 

President Obama is absolutely committed to continuing to make certain that everybody understands this rebalance is not a passing fancy, it’s not a momentary thing, and in fact it has grown.  We recently renegotiated a long-term defense pact with Japan.  We have reaffirmed our relationship with South Korea.  We have, obviously, with ASEAN and our presence in Southeast Asia as well as throughout the islands and the nations southwards to New Zealand and Australia, we’ve strengthened our presence there.  And we are continuing and we will continue, I can guarantee you, to work to impress on people that the values that bring us together don’t belong to one country.  They don’t belong to one nation.  I would tell you that I think they are genuinely universal values, and they certainly don’t belong to any ideology. 

There are a huge number of issues that Pacific nations have to wrestle with as a community now, and we all have a stake in regional stability and security.  The right to choose one’s own government, as I said, we believe is a birthright.  Economic growth is imperative for all of us.  But one thing above all looms as a threat, literally, to existence, and that is the connective tissue that holds – that connects all of us with respect to the environment and our responsibility to the ocean itself.

We just had two days of a conference in which speaker after speaker, film after film, expert after expert, scientist after scientist documented the degree to which we, mankind, are threatening ourselves as a consequence of the amount of carbon dioxide we are releasing into the atmosphere, as a result of too much money chasing too few fish, as a result of the devastating impact of pollution, run-off from development that streams out of rivers and down into the ocean so that we have over 500 dead zones.  And we can unfortunately boast a big one in the Gulf of Mexico where, coming out of the Mississippi River, from the various rivers that feed into it along the way, all the way from the northern part of our country down into the south.  We have runoff from agriculture, which overloads nitrates which kills the ecosystem. 

This is happening, unfortunately, everywhere.  The numbers of birds and fish that are found imbibing plastic, which has a 450-year life, therefore, obviously, a killer for many fowl and fish.  We face an extraordinary challenge to our fishing stocks almost everywhere:  some depleted, some stocks so low that they’re almost extinct, and in some places fisheries that are fished to the level that they’re near the possibility of collapse.

So all of what I’ve just said is obviously an enormous challenge and probably some of you could walk away tonight and say, “Boy, I hate to hear all those facts because I don’t know what I can do about it.”  Well, the problem is solvable.  What is shocking to me, and I think to many of us who are engaged in this effort, is the fact that it’s not something we can’t do something about.  The solutions are staring us in the face.  The solution to climate change, which we have to embrace rapidly because of the rate and pace at which coal-fired power plants are still being built – the solution is energy policy. 

And we have brave innovators and entrepreneurs who are on the cutting edge of producing alternative and renewable capacity to produce the energy that we need.  Whether it’s solar or wind or biomass or other forms, or even – some people say God perish the thought because of what happened in Japan, but if you don’t build on an earthquake fault and right next to the ocean, nuclear does have the ability, as we’ve seen in so many places, from France to the United States Navy, where we haven’t lost one sailor in more than 70 years of the use of nuclear power, or had one accident on a ship.  It is, because it is zero emissions, one of the alternatives we’re going to have to use.  And I’m confident that our scientists, as we do, will find the ways to create a fuel cycle that is unified and we can deal with the waste, and clearly we have safer and greater capacity in fourth-generation modular units. 

So the solutions are there.  And I just want to – I want to leave you with just one thought, a big thought about this, which is what excites me and why I’m banging away at this.  We’ve got to move rapidly if we’re going to save some of those island.  We have to be able to turn this around, and that means we’re going to have to embrace very forward-leaning policies very quickly.  And next year in Paris, in December, we will meet – all of our nations of the world – in order to try to set targets in order to be able to do what I just talked about.

But let me just tell you something.  We could produce – we’re not about to, but we could produce three times the entire electricity needs of the United States of America well into the future from 100 square miles down in the New Mexico, Colorado, Arizona region.  You could do it if you decided to.  We could do solar-thermal, we could do other things, but we have to build the infrastructure to do these kinds of things.  We have to invest in it.  And that is true all around the world where people have yet to embrace the simplest forms of energy efficiency, where we could be making a different set of choices about how you price carbon and what you do.

The bottom line is this:  The marketplace that made America richer than it ever imagined in the 1990s was a $1 trillion market with four – with what, 1 billion users.  One and one; $1 trillion market, 1 billion users.  Every single income earner in America, every quintile of our percentage of taxpayers, from the bottom 20 percent to the top, saw their incomes go up during the course of the 1990s.  We created more wealth in America because of one sector of our economy, the technology sector, that boomed, and it provided goods to those 1 billion people and became a $1 trillion market. 

Well, guess what?  The energy market that I am talking about today, as you look at it, is a $6 trillion market with 4 to 5 billion users, and it’s going to go up to 9 billion users by 2050.  It’s the mother of all markets.  It’s the greatest opportunity to build infrastructure, build power plants that are clean, build windmills, build alternatives, to have a whole new restructuring of the goods and services that are provided to people that provide the energy of the world.  And given the fact that almost half of the world still lives on about $2 a day and a huge percentage on $1 a day, the capacity for this development to change lives, save lives, reduce conflict, have an impact on security, change our ability to dream about a different kind of future is absolutely extraordinary.

So it’s a beautiful evening, you came here to have fun, I don’t want to go on and on tonight, but I’m just telling you, there is a solution staring us in the face, and the Pacific region, the Pacific islands can help to underscore to people what is really at stake.  It’s called life itself.  And the irony, the horrible fact is those nations most threatened are those nations least contributing to this problem.  So the developed world has an obligation to make this happen, and I look forward to working with our Kiwi friends and others and all of the Pacific islands.  We’re going to get this job done.  Thank you for Pacific Day.  Thank you for welcoming me here today.  Thank you very much.  (Applause.)

WHITE HOUSE PRESS CALL ON SOUTHWEST BORDER ENFORCEMENT

FROM:  THE WHITE HOUSE 

Press Call on Efforts to Enhance Enforcement on the Southwest Border

Via Conference Call
12:35 P.M. EDT

MS. VARGAS:  Thank you, everybody, for participating today. This call is on the record and without embargo.  You should also have received from the White House more information, including a factsheet from the Vice President’s trip to Guatemala and actions that we're seeking to address the flow of immigration.

So without further ado, we have Cecilia Muñoz, who is the Director of Domestic Policy Council of the White House.

Cecilia.

MS. MUŇOZ:  Thank you very much, Katherine.  Thanks to everybody for taking time to be on this call.  I'm actually on a cellphone in McCallum so I hope you can hear me.

So as folks know, we have been dealing with a surge of unaccompanied children.  And several weeks ago, the President asked DHS and the DHS Secretary, who, in turn, asked Administrator Fugate to coordinate the efforts across the federal government.  I’ve just witnessed those efforts in action, and this is an extraordinary interagency effort to deal with an urgent humanitarian situation.  And so that process is well underway.

We are also dealing with, in addition to unaccompanied children entering, and of course there are adults coming and adults who are bringing children who are also part of this surge coming from these three countries in Central America -- Guatemala, El Salvador and Honduras.  And so we are surging our enforcement resources in a way that my colleagues will describe in a moment to make sure that we are dealing properly with this particular surge.

Part of that is the Vice President’s trip to Guatemala today where he is meeting with officials, again, from those three -- leaders from those three countries, as well as from Mexico, to outline ways in which we will be working together to deal with this problem at its source, to make sure that we're doing everything possible both to support countries in stemming the tide of this migration, but also to deal with the misinformation that is being deliberately planted by criminal organizations, by smuggling networks, about what people can expect if they come to the United States.  That is misinformation that is being promulgated and put forward in a very deliberate way.  And part of what the Vice President’s effort as well as the administration effort overall is to make sure that people have accurate information and that we push back on the misinformation that is being spread and which is contributing to this problem.

MS. VARGAS:  Thank you, Cecilia.  And we're going to hear more about the specific steps that DHS will be doing in terms of enforcement resources.  We have on the line the Deputy Secretary of Homeland Security, Alejandro Mayorkas.

DEPUTY SECRETARY MAYORKAS:  Thank you very much, Katherine.

In light of the scale and the number of certain migrants from Central America, we at the Department of Homeland Security and our partners in the Department of Justice are taking additional steps to enhance our enforcement and removal proceedings.  We are surging resources to increase our capacity to detain individuals and adults with children, and to handle immigration court hearings.  This will allow Immigration and Customs Enforcement -- or ICE -- to return unlawful migrants from Central America who are ordered removed to their home countries more quickly.

And let me, if I can, cite some specific steps we are taking.  First, additional immigration judges, ICE attorneys and asylum officers are being assigned to process cases of adult migrants traveling by themselves, apprehended at the border, who are claiming credible fear and are claiming eligibility to apply for -- to attain asylum.  When an individual’s case is fully heard and it is found that the individual does not qualify for asylum, he or she will be immediately removed.  Many individuals from Central America are found to be ineligible for these forms of protections and are, in fact, promptly removed.

Second, and consistent with our enforcement priorities regarding recent border crossers, the Department of Homeland Security is actively working to secure additional space to detain adults with children apprehended crossing the border.  We will work to ensure, of course, that the detention of adults with children is done as humanely as possible and in an appropriate setting that meets applicable legal standards.  We are also using alternatives to detention programs for adults with children that are not physically detained.  With very few exceptions, all individuals apprehended, including adults with children, are placed in removal proceedings.

Third and finally, once additional facilities are established to detain adults with children apprehended while crossing the border, we and the Department of Justice will deploy an additional surge of immigration judges, ICE attorneys, and asylum officers to focus on these cases.  The surge resources will ensure that the cases are processed both fairly and as quickly as possible, ensuring the protection of asylum seekers while enabling us to promptly remove individuals in appropriate cases.

Thank you, Katherine.

MS. VARGAS:  Thank you.  I also want to remind you that Secretary Johnson is with Cecilia and representatives from the Department of Justice and FEMA at the Rio Grande Valley today.

Now we're going to hear more about our work with our partners in the Central American governments, and I'm here with Ricardo Zuñiga, the Senior Director for Western Hemisphere Affairs in the National Security Council.

MR. ZUŇIGA:  Thank you very much, Katherine.

So you’ll the factsheets related to the specific assistance and cooperation that we're going to be providing in Central America, but I wanted to touch on a couple of key points.  First is that we've been working with the governments in Guatemala and El Salvador and Honduras, as well as with the Mexican government, from the beginning of this increase in migration.  And in all cases, what we've found is a high level of interest in working with us because they understand the humanitarian nature of what it is that we're trying to do and the fact that we're all interested, first and foremost, in preventing the dangerous migration of children, particularly as we've seen an increase in children under 12 years of age.  They all have an interest in making sure that their citizens are well cared for.

So the Vice President is meeting today with the Presidents of El Salvador and Guatemala, meeting with a senior official from the government of Honduras, and the Mexican government is participating as well.  Yesterday, President Obama met -- excuse me -- called President Peña Nieto of Mexico to discuss our shared responsibility in dealing with this matter and there, again, found a high level of interest in working with us to address the humanitarian nature of this phenomenon, and as well, to encourage safe, orderly and legal migration.  And again, that is something that all the governments have committed to.

I just want to highlight a couple of items from our foreign assistance that are going to be directed towards Central America to help us deal with this immediate situation.  I'll note that the U.S. government is going to be providing $9.6 million in support for El Salvador, Guatemala and Honduras to invest in their repatriation centers so that as people are being removed they have someplace they can orderly land and then be processed back home.

In Guatemala, we're launching a new $40 million U.S. Agency for International Development program to improve citizen security in the areas that are most affected by violence.  In El Salvador, we're launching a $25 million crime prevention USAID program to establish 77 youth centers, youth outreach centers, in addition to the 30 that we already have in place.  And this is in the context of a substantial amount of assistance that we've provided under the Central American Regional Security Initiative and, as well, as we've provided under other types of assistance -- about $130 million in other forms of bilateral assistance to those three countries for programs related to health, education and to promote economic growth.
Thanks, Katherine.

MS. VARGAS:  Thank you very much, Ricardo.

And then let’s open up for questions.  I know the time is limited, but I just want to make sure that folks know that this is being recorded.

Q    I actually have a few questions.  What sort of bed space capacity are we talking about?  Currently, there’s fewer than 100 beds.  But, additionally, how many people this fiscal year have been released with notices to appear and how many of those folks have actually appeared?

DEPUTY SECRETARY MAYORKAS:  I can take that call.  We are actively pursuing additional capacity to house the adults with children.  We're underway in that process now and we are identifying locations.  We will get back to you with respect to the precise numbers on the notices to appear.  But let me make one very important point, and that is that our detention and notice-to-appear decisions are made on a case-by-case basis, and of course, our detention decisions are predicated on an assessment of our prioritization, including at the very top our national security and public safety concerns.

Q    Thank you for taking my question.  I have several, but I'll just keep it down to two.  I'm just wondering if you could give us a sense of what you guys are doing to pursue the coyotes that are bringing these kids in.  A lot of the kids that are in those detention centers say that they paid coyotes to bring them in, so I'm wondering if you have any sense of whether or not you're pursuing them criminally and, if so, what are the results of that, and whether or not these kids are getting access to legal assistance to make their cases for asylum.  Thank you.

DEPUTY SECRETARY MAYORKAS:  Thank you very much.  So we are, indeed, surging our law enforcement resources to address -- to attack the criminal organizations that are exploiting these individuals, and we are pursuing them in the criminal enforcement arena.  So we are adding agents to this very aggressive effort.

Q    I'd like to know what you're going to do to try to publicize this new enforcement approach in the region, since you're acknowledging that people have a different view there.  And I want to follow up on AP’s question.  You said that we’ll get back to you on the numbers.  Does that mean that you'll get back to us today?  In the past, you haven't been willing or able to produce any numbers, and I'm also interested in knowing how many people have been -- certainly the first part -- released with a notice to appear.

DEPUTY SECRETARY MAYORKAS:  Well, I think we have, if I may, provided some numbers, and I'm happy to repeat those numbers now. As of June 15, approximately 52,000 unaccompanied children have been apprehended along the Southwest border.  That I think is, of course, a very important data point.  And as of the end of May of this fiscal year, approximately 39,000 adults with children have been apprehended along the Southwest border.  I think those are two very significant and germane data points for you.

I'm sorry, you asked a different question other than data -- what are we doing, I think it was, to publicize the additional steps that we are taking.  As Cecilia mentioned, in addition to the effort that we are making now, of course, the Vice President is in-country today and communicating this very important message.  We also are communicating this message both domestically here in the United States through various channels, as well as in the countries of origin.

MR. ZUŇIGA:  Let me just jump in there.  Making sure this is well understood and that the facts around U.S. immigration policy are well understood is the main factor behind having the Vice President meet with the Presidents in those three Central American countries today.  Our embassies in those countries are also undertaking public messaging and the governments themselves are making clear to their own publics that people who travel -- that minors who travel under this current migration are not going to be eligible for deferred action, nor will they be benefiting from any comprehensive immigration reform.

Q    Thanks for taking my question.  This question is for Deputy Secretary Mayorkas.  This has been some reports for the plans by DHS to move some of these minors to a vacant facility in Virginia that has been put on hold because (inaudible) in that town are opposed to this movement.  So the question is what is going to happen in this particular instance?  And also, the site that these people are opposed -- I wonder how that is going to complicate your efforts to look for additional space to accommodate these children.

DEPUTY SECRETARY MAYORKAS:  I appreciate the question.  As I mentioned earlier, we are actively and aggressively pursuing additional facilities.  We have not made final determination on which particular facilities we will select.  There are a number of considerations including those that can be ready in the quickest possible way while complying with the legal requirements and with respect to the conditions in which the individuals will be housed, including adults with children.  And so we will, in fact, announce additional locations as those decisions are made.

Q    A couple questions on this.  First of all, how many of those released with a notice to appear actually do appear?  Why are you not using -- we're told by the Border Patrol agents down there in the region that as soon as a year ago you were using planes to send both mothers with children and children back to their home countries.  Instead of housing them here, you were sending them back like you do minors from Mexico.  And since judges must consider the percentage -- must consider what’s best for the child, what’s the percentage of minors who are actually returned to their country even after they go through the system?

DEPUTY SECRETARY MAYORKAS:  So as I articulated previously, I don't have the response to the data question that you asked with respect to the notices to appear.  But there’s a very important point here, that we continue to remove individuals to the countries of origin in compliance with law and those removals are accomplished via flights, as they have been conducted over the past year to which you refer.  That process continues.

Q    Speaker Boehner, just this morning, and other Republicans have called for the National Guard to be sent in.  Is this under any consideration by the administration at this moment?

DEPUTY SECRETARY MAYORKAS:  Right now what we are doing is
-- remember that we are apprehending these individuals, and so the question before us is how can we make the process more efficient, given the surge in the number of individuals who are being apprehended, and how best can we address those individuals in terms of their humanitarian claims of relief, as well as the removal for those who are not claiming credible fear.  So that is not a process in which the National Guard is involved.  It is something that comes within our appropriate jurisdiction and responsibility between the Department of Homeland Security and the Department of Justice.

We, of course, just received the letter from Speaker Boehner and others and we'll review it right away to understand how they envision the role of the National Guard outside the process to which I just referred.

Q    My question is we had heard that -- this is to the question about the facilities where these families will be held. We had heard that military bases were being lined up as potential sites and that one was ready to be opened.  Is that true?  Are military bases either in line or are you considering them?  And advocates have expressed concerns that families would be housed there.  Can you speak to how they would be humanely detained at military bases?

DEPUTY SECRETARY MAYORKAS:  Thank you for the question.  We have not made any final determination with respect to the particular facilities at which adults with children would be housed.  But one thing is certain, that we will house them in facilities that are humane and that are compliant with the legal requirements for the housing of these individuals.

Q    On the numbers you had earlier about unaccompanied children apprehended on the Southwest border, you said as of June 15, 52,000; at the end of May, 39,000 adults.  Is that in the fiscal year -- both of those numbers are since last October 1st? Or what do those numbers -- since when -- when to when?

DEPUTY SECRETARY MAYORKAS:  They are fiscal year 2014.  But let me be clear, if I may, on the second category, and I'll just repeat -- it was 52,000 unaccompanied children as of June 15 in fiscal year 2014, and 39,000 adults with children as of the end of May.  And that, too, is fiscal year 2014.

Q    So since last October?

DEPUTY SECRETARY MAYORKAS:  Yes.

Q    Thank you.

MS. VARGAS:  And thank you, everybody, for your participation.

END
12:58 P.M. EDT

Friday, June 20, 2014

WHITE HOUSE FACT SHEET ON CHILDREN CROSSING ALONE INTO UNITED STATES

FROM:  THE WHITE HOUSE 

FACT SHEET: Unaccompanied Children from Central America

The Administration remains greatly concerned by the rise in unaccompanied children from Central America who are crossing into the United States. These children are some of the most vulnerable, and many become victims of violent crime or sexual abuse along the dangerous journey. There has also been a rise in the number of very young children, female children, and adults with their children that are making the journey. The vast majority of these individuals rely on dangerous human smuggling networks to transport them up through Central America and Mexico. 
To address the situation, the President directed the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and the Federal Emergency Management Agency to coordinate a government-wide response to this urgent situation. Our first priority is to manage the urgent humanitarian situation by making sure these children are housed, fed, and receive any necessary medical treatment. We also are taking steps to improve enforcement and partnering with our Central American counterparts in three key areas: combating gang violence and strengthening citizen security, spurring economic development, and improving capacity to receive and reintegrate returned families and children.
In Guatemala, the Vice President is meeting with regional leaders to address the rise in the flow of unaccompanied children and adults with their children to the United States, to discuss our work together with the countries of Central America, and to discuss our efforts to help address the underlying security and economic issues that cause migration.
Partnering with Central America and Mexico
New Programs
  • The U.S. Government will be providing $9.6 million in additional support for Central American governments to receive and reintegrate their repatriated citizens. This funding will enable El Salvador, Guatemala, and Honduras to make substantial investments in their existing repatriation centers, provide training to immigration officials on migrant care, and increase the capacity of these governments and non-governmental organizations to provide expanded services to returned migrants. 
  • In Guatemala, we are launching a new $40-million U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) program over 5 years to improve citizen security. This program will work in some of the most violent communities to reduce the risk factors for youth involvement in gangs and address factors driving migration to the United States.
  • In El Salvador, we are initiating a new $25-million Crime and Violence Prevention USAID program over 5 years that will establish 77 youth outreach centers in addition to the 30 already in existence. These will continue to offer services to at-risk youth who are susceptible to gang recruitment and potential migration.
  • In Honduras, under the Central American Regional Security Initiative (CARSI), we will provide $18.5 million to support community policing and law enforcement efforts to confront gangs and other sources of crime. In addition, USAID will build on an existing initiative to support 40 youth outreach centers by soon announcing a substantial new Crime and Violence Prevention program to further address root causes.
  • USAID is calling for proposals to support new public-private partnerships through the Global Development Alliance to increase economic and educational opportunities for at risk youth in El Salvador, Guatemala, and Honduras.
  • The United States also plans to provide $161.5 million this year for CARSI programs that are critical to enabling Central American countries to respond to the region’s most pressing security and governance challenges. Our assistance will help stem migration flows as well as address root cause of the migration. This assistance will include:
    • Approximately $65 million for Rule of Law, Human Rights and Transparency programs, including activities to prevent at-risk youth from joining gangs and encourage their involvement in community crime prevention efforts and programs to expand education and job training.
    • Another approximately $96.5 million will go toward peace, security, stabilization, and other related rule of law programs to strengthen immigration, law enforcement, and judicial authorities and promote anti-gang and human rights programs.
Ongoing Programs
  • The United States is providing almost $130 million in ongoing bilateral assistance to El Salvador, Honduras, and Guatemala for a variety of programs related to health, education, climate change, economic growth, military cooperation, and democracy assistance.   
  • We are collaborating on campaigns to help potential migrants understand the significant danger of relying on human smuggling networks and to reinforce that recently arriving children and individuals are not eligible for programs like Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, commonly called DACA, and earned citizenship provisions in comprehensive immigration reform currently under consideration in the Congress. 
Increased Enforcement
  • The Department of Justice and DHS are taking additional steps to enhance enforcement and removal proceedings. We are surging government enforcement resources to increase our capacity to detain individuals and adults who bring their children with them and to handle immigration court hearings – in cases where hearings are necessary – as quickly and efficiently as possible while also while also protecting those who are seeking asylum. That will allow ICE to return unlawful migrants from Central America to their home countries more quickly.
  • These new measures build on a strong existing record of enforcement and removal of Central Americans entering the country unlawfully. In FY 2013, ICE removed 47,769 individuals from Guatemala, 37,049 from Honduras, and 21,602 from El Salvador. This represents approximately 29% of all ICE removals.
  • The Vice President will reiterate that unaccompanied children and adults arriving with their children are not eligible to benefit from the passage of immigration reform legislation or from the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) process.

SECRETARY KERRY'S PRESS STATEMENT ON WORLD REFUGEE DAY

FROM:  U.S. STATE DEPARTMENT 

Commemorating World Refugee Day

Press Statement
John Kerry
Secretary of State
Washington, DC
June 20, 2014


World Refugee Day is more than a moment marked on a calendar. It is a time to honor the strength and resilience of refugees around the world and renew our determination to support them as they rebuild their lives and communities. The United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees now counts the number of refugees, asylum-seekers, and internally displaced persons at 51 million. That number is staggering by any measure. It represents children, women, and men from Syria, South Sudan, the Central African Republic, and now Iraq, who face death, destruction, and dislocation. For them, daily survival is a gamble.

The dreams refugees harbor have special meaning for Americans. Even before our land was a nation, America was a haven for those seeking freedom from persecution, hunger, oppression and war. Today, refugees continue to look to America for relief and opportunity. These refugees, many of whom arrive having lost everything, become some of the most resilient, entrepreneurial, and devoted citizens we have.

When I visited the UN’s Zaatari refugee camp in Jordan last year, I saw firsthand the value and importance of our work. Hundreds of thousands of Syrians – many women and children – live there in suspended animation, waiting for the opportunity to rebuild their lives. I met with some of the camp’s many residents. Their needs were simple: food, shelter, stability. But most of all, they want to live their lives with the dignity and respect that all people deserve.

That’s why I’m proud that the United States is the largest donor to humanitarian relief worldwide. Our humanitarian assistance has saved lives and eased suffering for 4.7 million people inside Syria and more than 2.8 million refugees in neighboring countries. We have also recently announced nearly $300 million in additional humanitarian assistance to help the people affected by the conflict in South Sudan. Beyond just dollars and programs, our efforts are assisting millions who have fled conflict and persecution in the Central African Republic, Burma, Afghanistan, and many other places around the world.

World Refugee Day is more than a moment marked on a calendar. It is a time to honor the strength and resilience of refugees around the world and renew our determination to support them as they rebuild their lives and communities. The United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees now counts the number of refugees, asylum-seekers, and internally displaced persons at 51 million. That number is staggering by any measure. It represents children, women, and men from Syria, South Sudan, the Central African Republic, and now Iraq, who face death, destruction, and dislocation. For them, daily survival is a gamble.

The dreams refugees harbor have special meaning for Americans. Even before our land was a nation, America was a haven for those seeking freedom from persecution, hunger, oppression and war. Today, refugees continue to look to America for relief and opportunity. These refugees, many of whom arrive having lost everything, become some of the most resilient, entrepreneurial, and devoted citizens we have.

When I visited the UN’s Zaatari refugee camp in Jordan last year, I saw firsthand the value and importance of our work. Hundreds of thousands of Syrians – many women and children – live there in suspended animation, waiting for the opportunity to rebuild their lives. I met with some of the camp’s many residents. Their needs were simple: food, shelter, stability. But most of all, they want to live their lives with the dignity and respect that all people deserve.

That’s why I’m proud that the United States is the largest donor to humanitarian relief worldwide. Our humanitarian assistance has saved lives and eased suffering for 4.7 million people inside Syria and more than 2.8 million refugees in neighboring countries. We have also recently announced nearly $300 million in additional humanitarian assistance to help the people affected by the conflict in South Sudan. Beyond just dollars and programs, our efforts are assisting millions who have fled conflict and persecution in the Central African Republic, Burma, Afghanistan, and many other places around the world.

I’m especially proud that the United States welcomes the most refugees to our shores every year. Nearly 70,000 refugees from 65 nations found a new home in in the United States last year. We expect to admit just as many in 2014.

The losses refugees suffer, the journeys they make, and the commitment they put into rebuilding their lives are remarkable. Today of all days, we salute their courage and resilience. We pay tribute to the generosity of countries that give them refuge. And we applaud the compassion of communities and organizations the world over that lend a helping hand.

I’m especially proud that the United States welcomes the most refugees to our shores every year. Nearly 70,000 refugees from 65 nations found a new home in in the United States last year. We expect to admit just as many in 2014.

The losses refugees suffer, the journeys they make, and the commitment they put into rebuilding their lives are remarkable. Today of all days, we salute their courage and resilience. We pay tribute to the generosity of countries that give them refuge. And we applaud the compassion of communities and organizations the world over that lend a helping hand.

U.S. SENDS BEST WISHES TO PEOPLE OF LUXEMBOURG ON THEIR NATIONAL DAY

FROM:  U.S. STATE DEPARTMENT 
On the Occasion of National Day in Luxembourg
Press Statement
John Kerry
Secretary of State
Washington, DC
June 20, 2014

On behalf of President Obama and the people of the United States, I am delighted to send best wishes to Grand Duke Henri and the people of Luxembourg as you celebrate your National Day on June 23.

The United States and Luxembourg share a long history. This year, as we commemorate the 70th anniversary of the Battle of the Bulge, we remember the bravery of both our nations in World War II. Many Americans heard the call of duty then, including my father who served in the U.S. Army Air Corps and my mother who treated the sick and wounded in France. Luxembourg heard that same call, and paid the price of war with occupation. But in the end, American and Luxembourger forces fought side-by-side and struck a blow for freedom and democracy everywhere. Today, we remember all those who gave their lives, including the more than 5,000 American troops laid to rest in Luxembourg.

Decades ago, we fought together, so today we can work together. We value the close cooperation our two countries enjoy on the UN Security Council and at NATO, where every day we continue the important work of advancing democracy, peace, and prosperity for all of the world’s citizens.

So as the cannons salute and the fireworks commence on your National Day, know that the United States stands with you as a close partner and friend. We wish all Luxembourgers a happy and prosperous year.

U.S. DEFENSE DEPARTMENT CONTRACTS FOR JUNE 20, 2014

FROM:  U.S. DEFENSE DEPARTMENT 

CONTRACTS

NAVY

Sikorsky Aircraft Corp., Stratford, Connecticut, is being awarded $115,705,556 for firm-fixed-price delivery order 4019 against a previously issued Basic Ordering Agreement (N00019-14-G-0004). This order provides for non-recurring engineering and program support for the production and delivery of nine MH-60R aircraft for the Danish Defense Acquisition and Logistics Organization under the Foreign Military Sales program. Work will be performed in Stratford, Connecticut (52 percent); West Palm Beach, Florida (22 percent) and various locations outside the continental United States (17 percent), and within the continental United States (9 percent); work is expected to be completed in July 2018. FMS funds in the amount of $115,587,382 will be obligated at time of award, none of which will expire at the end of the current fiscal year. The Naval Air Systems Command, Patuxent River, Maryland, is the contracting activity.

Bell Helicopter Textron Inc., Fort Worth, Texas, is being awarded a $44,667,969 modification to definitize a previously awarded undefinitized contract action (N00383-14-D-015N) to a cost- plus- fixed- fee price contract. This contract provides for the repair of various parts for the UH-1Y and AH-1Z Upgrade Helicopters. Work will be performed in Hurst, Texas, and work is expected to be completed by January 2017. No funds will be obligated at the time of award and contract funds will not expire at the end of the current fiscal year. Fiscal 2014 working capital funds (Navy) will be used on individual delivery orders as they are issued. This contract was a non-competitive requirement in accordance with 10 U.S.C. 2304 (c)(1). NAVSUP Weapon Systems Support, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, is the contracting activity.

Tetrad Digital Integrity, Washington, District of Columbia, is being awarded a $7,801,515 modification under a previously awarded indefinite-quantity/indefinite-delivery contract (N00033-12-D-6505) to exercise a one-year option for information technology services related to information assurance, mobile communication assets, shipboard electronic support and communication security support. Work will be performed worldwide, and is expected to be completed by June 2015. No funds will be obligated at the time of award, and funds will not expire at the end of the current fiscal year. The U.S. Navy’s Military Sealift Command, Washington, District of Columbia, is the contracting activity (N00033-12-D-6505).

Systems Technology Forum Limited, Fredericksburg, Virginia, is being awarded a $7,386,653 modification under a previously awarded indefinite-
quantity/indefinite-delivery contract (N00033-12-D-6503) to exercise a one-year option for information technology services related to information assurance, mobile communication assets, shipboard electronic support and communication security support. Work will be performed worldwide, and is expected to be completed by June 2015. No funds will be obligated at the time of award, and funds will not expire at the end of the current fiscal year. The U.S. Navy’s Military Sealift Command, Washington, District of Columbia, is the contracting activity (N00033-12-D-6503).

Syzygy Technologies, Inc., San Diego, California, is being awarded a $7,077,042 modification under a previously awarded indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity contract (N00033-12-D-6504) to exercise a one-year option for information technology services related to information assurance, mobile communication assets, shipboard electronic support and communication security support. Work will be performed worldwide, and is expected to be completed by June 2015. No funds will be obligated at the time of award, and funds will not expire at the end of the current fiscal year. The U.S. Navy’s Military Sealift Command, Washington, District of Columbia, is the contracting activity (N00033-12-D-6504).

ARMY

Rapiscan Systems, Inc., Torrance, California, was awarded a $102,521,440 foreign military sales contract with options for 80 Rapiscan Eagle M60's and contractor logistics support to Iraq. Work will be performed in Torrance, California, and Iraq with an estimated completion date of June 19, 2016. One bid was solicited and one received. Fiscal 2010 other procurement (Army) funds in the amount of $102,521,440 are being obligated at the time of the award. Army Contracting Command, Natick, Massachusetts, is the contracting activity (W911QY-14-C-0081).

J. Kokolakis Contracting, Inc., Bohemia, New York, was awarded a $48,826,910 firm-fixed-price contract for renovation and modernization of the MacArthur Short Barracks at West Point with an estimated completion date of June 18, 2015. Bids were solicited via the internet with six received. Fiscal 2014 operations and maintenance (Army) funds in the amount of $48,826,910 are being obligated at the time of the award. Army Contracting Command, West Point, New York, is contracting activity (W911SD-14-C-0005).

STG, Inc.*, Reston, Virginia was awarded a $27,229,337 cost-plus-fixed-fee contract with options for information technology support for the 2d Signal Center Theater Network Operations and Security Center, Fort Huachuca, Arizona, with a completion date of June 30, 2017. Bids were solicited via the internet with 12 received. Fiscal 2014 operations and maintenance (Army) funds in the amount of $27,229,337 are being obligated at the time of the award. Army Contracting Command, Fort Huachuca, Arizona, is the contracting activity (W91RUS-14-C-0015).

L-3 Communications Corp., Wilmington, Massachusetts, was awarded a $13,384,687 cost-plus-fixed-fee contract with options for the wide area 6-degree payload critical design/flight under Army Research Laboratory broad agency announcement W911NF-12-R-0011. The estimated completion date is June 30, 2017. Work will be performed in Wilmington, Massachusetts. Bids were solicited via the Internet with six received. Fiscal 2014 other procurement funds in the amount of $13,384,687 are being obligated at the time of the award. Army Contracting Command is the contracting activity (W911QX-14-C-0049).

AIR FORCE

The Boeing Co. Defense, Space and Security, St. Louis, Missouri, has been awarded an $80,000,000 indefinite-delivery/ indefinite-quantity contract for Small Diameter Bomb Increment 1 (SDB 1) technical support. The contractor will provide SDB 1 weapon integration support, including technical support to the designated aircraft System Program Offices testing, upgrades, program management support, and software updates to the SDB 1system required to integrate the SBD 1 weapon system with other weapons systems. Work will be performed in St. Louis, Missouri, and is expected to be completed by June 19, 2019. This award is a result of a sole-source acquisition. Fiscal 2014 U.S. Navy research, development, training and evaluations funds in the amount of $250,774 are being obligated at time of award. Air Force Life Cycle Management Center/EBMK, Eglin Air Force Base, Florida, is the contracting activity (FA8672-14-D-0007).

DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY

Welch Allyn, Inc., Skaneateles Falls, New York, has been awarded a maximum $43,650,000 modification (P00101) exercising the fifth option period on a one-year base contract (SPM2D1-09-D-8350) with nine one-year option periods. This is a fixed-price with economic-price-adjustment contract for patient monitoring systems, subsystems, accessories, consumables, spare/repair parts and training. Location of performance is New York with a June 23, 2015 performance completion date. Using military services are Army, Navy, Air Force, Marine Corps and federal civilian agencies. Type of appropriation is fiscal 2014 defense working capital funds. The contracting activity is the Defense Logistics Agency Troop Support, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

General Electric Aviation Systems, Vandalia, Ohio, has been awarded a modification (P00002) to add additional aviation consumable items to the existing long term contract (SPE4A2-14-D-0001). This modification adds an additional $644,165 to increase the overall contract value to $6,700,498. This contract is a three-year base with two three-year option periods. This is a fixed-price with economic-price-adjustment, prospective-price-redetermination contract. Locations of performance are Ohio, Michigan and Illinois with a Feb. 23, 2017 performance completion date. Using military services are Army, Navy, Air Force and Marine Corps. Type of appropriation is fiscal 2014 defense working capital funds. The contracting activity is the Defense Logistics Agency Aviation, Richmond, Virginia.

MISSILE DEFENSE AGENCY

BAE Systems, Inc., of Nashua, New Hampshire, was awarded a $9,404,964 cost-plus-fixed-fee contract for 512×512 two-color high speed Digital Focal Plane Arrays (DFPAs). The contract provides for development and demonstration of 512×512 two-color high speed DFPAs for missile defense, offering a combination of high resolution, high frame rate and advanced digital processing functionality. BAE will deliver five DFPAs of the Baseline Development Run and three DFPAs of the Baseline Process Verification Run to the Missile Defense Agency for additional testing, a set of interface electronics and a user guide to facilitate testing. Options work will also include an updated read-out integrated circuit design, leveraging available results from the base program and verification of DFPA design compliance to MDA’s High Altitude Exoatmospheric Nuclear Survivability Standard. Work will be performed at Lexington, Massachusetts, and Camarillo, California, with an expected completion date of January 2017. Fiscal 2014 research, development, test and evaluation funds in the amount of $4,301,000 are being obligated at time of award. This contract was a competitive acquisition under the MDA Broad Agency Announcement for Advanced Technology Innovation, HQ0147-11-ATI-BAA. The Missile Defense Agency, Redstone Arsenal, Alabama, is the contracting activity (HQ0147-14-C-0007).

*Small business


3-D Printing at NASA's Armstrong Flight Research Center

SECRETARY HAGEL, GERMAN'S MINISTER OF DEFENSE LEYEN DISCUSS MUTUAL INTEREST

FROM:  U.S. DEFENSE DEPARTMENT  

Right:  Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel hosts an honor cordon to welcome Germany's Minister of Defense Ursula von der Leyen to the Pentagon, June 19, 2014. The two leaders met to discuss matters of mutual national interest. DOD Photo by Glenn Fawcett.  
Hagel, German Defense Minister Discuss NATO, Iraq
By Cheryl Pellerin
American Forces Press Service

WASHINGTON, June 19, 2014 – Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel and German Defense Minister Ursula von der Leyen met this morning at the Pentagon, reaffirming the two nations’ strong friendship and alliance, Pentagon Press Secretary Navy Rear Adm. John Kirby said in a statement.

The leaders discussed security challenges, ranging from post-2014 commitments in Afghanistan to recent developments in Iraq, Syria and Ukraine, Kirby said.
"Secretary Hagel and Minister von der Leyen discussed both nations' efforts to reinforce NATO and to reassure our NATO allies since Russia's aggressive actions in Ukraine,” he said, adding that such reassurance includes ongoing air, land and sea measures by the U.S. military and other NATO members.
The measures include President Barack Obama's June 3 announcement of the European Reassurance Initiative of up to $1 billion to fund increased rotational presence and exercises across Europe, and Germany's contributions, which in September will include support to NATO's Baltic air policing mission, Kirby said.

Hagel also thanked von der Leyen for Germany's contributions and sacrifices in Afghanistan.

“Germany has been the third largest contributor of troops and the leader of Regional Command North,” the press secretary said. “We welcome Germany's willingness to continue leading Regional Command North as part of NATO's post-2014 Resolute Support mission.”

Hagel and von der Leyen also discussed the upcoming NATO Summit, to be held Sept. 4-5 in Wales.

Kirby said the United States and Germany count on each other to be credible, capable partners as leaders in the transatlantic alliance and the global community.
“As the crises in Iraq, Syria and Ukraine remind us,” he added, “our leadership roles require investment in ready, modern, agile militaries.”

He added, “Both leaders recognized the importance of investing in capabilities that will strengthen our collective security.”

Both also agreed that, as the NATO Summit approaches, they must renew their commitments to transatlantic security, Kirby said.

After their meeting, Hagel left the Pentagon for the White House where the president met with members of his national security team in the Situation Room ahead of Obama’s statement on the U.S. response to violence in Iraq.
Von der Leyen, who Hagel invited to Washington in February during the Munich Security Conference, held a press conference on the steps of the Pentagon’s River entrance.

The German defense minister characterized her conversation with Hagel as “trustful and constructive,” and on the crisis in Iraq she said, “For the long term we need a sustainable solution for the whole region. That is, we have to integrate the diplomatic and political solution from neighboring countries of the whole region.”

AG HOLDER'S REMARKS ON HEROIN AND PRESCRIPTION DRUGS

FROM:  U.S. JUSTICE DEPARTMENT 
Attorney General Holder Delivers at the ONDCP Summit on Heroin and Prescription Drugs
~ Thursday, June 19, 2014

Thank you, Michael [Botticelli], for those kind words; for your more than two decades of service and leadership in confronting the crisis posed by substance use disorders; and for all that you and your colleagues in the Office of National Drug Control Policy do every day to forge safer and healthier communities.

 It’s a pleasure to help welcome this distinguished group to the White House for today’s important summit.  And it’s a privilege to stand with so many experts, advocates, and extraordinary leaders from America’s law enforcement, public health, and education communities.  The dedication that you have shown to confronting heroin and prescription drug abuse – not only by participating in events like this one, but through your tireless work across the country – is not only inspiring; it makes a tremendous, positive difference.  Your efforts enable us to improve and save countless lives.  And your guidance and expertise – when it comes to addressing the drug abuse epidemic holistically and keeping dangerous substances off of our streets – comes at a time when much is at stake, and this work could not be more important.

You know as well as anyone that the challenges we face are daunting.  You’ve shown us that, as we seek to address the problem of substance abuse, it makes sense to focus on the most dangerous types of drugs.  And right now, few substances are more lethal than prescription opioids and heroin.

Between 2006 and 2010 – across America – heroin deaths increased by 45 percent.  That’s a shocking statistic, but it’s only one of many clear indications that we’re up against an urgent public safety and public health crisis – one that affects Americans in every state, in every region, and from every background and walk of life.  We’ve learned from scientific studies, treatment providers, victims, and investigations that the cycle of heroin abuse commonly begins with prescription opioid abuse.  And this can make the problem exceedingly difficult to track and to overcome.

But that’s exactly why your participation – and your leadership – is more vital today than ever before.  As federal officials, law enforcement officers, medical providers, and prevention and treatment experts, each of you stands on the front lines of our effort to protect this nation from the devastating impact of illegal drug use.  And together – through collaboration and cooperation among stakeholders at every level – we’re making significant strides to build a better, brighter, and more secure future for ourselves and our children.

In recent years, we have targeted the illegal supply chain.  We’ve taken steps to prevent doctor-shopping by drug users and distributors.  We’ve disrupted pill mills masquerading as pain management clinics around the country.  We’ve developed and advocated for cutting-edge public health solutions on the state, local, and community levels.  And as we speak – under the leadership of Acting Director Botticelli and his colleagues in ONDCP – we’re implementing the Administration’s 2011 Prescription Drug Abuse Prevention Plan, so we can target abuse through education, monitoring, medication disposal, and enforcement.

As Acting Director Botticelli noted, these comprehensive efforts are showing promise.  But our work is far from over.  Significant challenges remain before us, and a range of serious and evolving obstacles lie ahead.

Now, I have no doubt – based on the professionalism, the grit, and the insight that has characterized the work that’s underway – that we will confront the impediments ahead with determination and strength.  And I want to assure you that, as you drive our national efforts into the future, you will continue to have not only my admiration and gratitude – but also my full and unwavering support.  My colleagues and I – at every level of the Justice Department – are firmly dedicated to fulfilling the goals we share and combating the challenges on today’s agenda.  And I’m proud to note that this is a commitment we’re backing up with robust action.

Since the beginning of this Administration, with DEA as our lead agency, the Justice Department has adopted a sweeping strategy to prevent pharmaceutical controlled substances from getting into the hands of non-medical users.  We have used our regulatory authority to review and investigate new pharmacy applications to identify and prevent storefront drug traffickers from obtaining DEA registrations.  And since 2010, we have joined with our regulatory partners to sponsor eight Drug Take Back events that provide the general public with a safe, convenient and responsible means of disposing of prescription drugs – providing an incentive for consumers to safely clean out their medicine cabinets.  These Drug Take Back efforts have resulted in the safe destruction of over 2,100 tons of prescription drugs.  And DEA is in the process of promulgating a regulation that will make it easier to establish permanent drug disposal sites nationwide.

We also have stepped up our investigatory efforts, opening more than 4,500 heroin-related investigations since 2011, and increasing the amount of heroin seized along America’s southwest border between 2008 and 2013 by 320 percent. Of course, like you, I recognize that we cannot solve this problem through enforcement alone.  And we will never be able to arrest or incarcerate our way to becoming a safer nation.

This is why education, prevention, and treatment – along with vigorous enforcement – must all be significant components of any comprehensive solution.  Over the past few years, the DEA and others within the Department of Justice have stepped forward to help educate pharmacists, doctors, and other health practitioners in the identification and prevention of controlled substance diversion during the healthcare delivery process.  In the Northern District of Ohio, for example, our U.S. Attorney convened a summit at the Cleveland Clinic, bringing together health and law enforcement professionals to address that area’s 400-percent rise in heroin-related deaths.  And across the country, DEA has participated in numerous conferences at the request of professional health care practitioner organizations to educate their members on prescription drug abuse and diversion trends.  Additionally, since 2011, DEA has sponsored 34 Pharmacy Diversion Awareness Conferences in 16 states – training over 6,500 pharmacists and pharmacy techs in prescription drug abuse trends, the Controlled Substances Act, and the pharmacist’s role in preventing controlled substance diversion at the pharmacy level.

On the national level, we’re moving even more broadly – under the Smart on Crime initiative I announced last August – to put in place a range of targeted, systemic reforms to ensure that 21st century challenges can be met with 21st century solutions.

This groundbreaking new effort relies upon proven, evidence-based strategies to achieve better outcomes throughout the federal criminal justice system – and particularly with regard to nonviolent, drug-related crimes.  These policy changes are predicated on the notion that our work must be informed, and our criminal justice system continually strengthened, by the most effective and efficient strategies available.

We’re also strengthening diversion programs like drug courts, veterans courts, and community service initiatives – so we can provide alternatives to incarceration for some people and offer treatment and rehabilitation to those who need it.  Nationwide, the Justice Department is supporting more than 2,600 specialty courts that connect over 120,000 people convicted of drug-related offenses with the services they need to avoid future drug use.

And we’re striving to improve and reinforce reentry programs and initiatives from coast to coast – so we can enable formerly incarcerated individuals to return to their communities better prepared to contribute, and to lead, as full and productive members of society.

Let me be clear:  we will never waver in our commitment to act aggressively to keep America’s streets safe and our children free from drug addiction and abuse.  And we will never stop being tough on crime and the choices that breed it.  But, like you, we also recognize that we must be smart, efficient, and effective as we strive to disrupt and diminish the scourge of addiction – along with the underlying conditions that trap too many individuals in a vicious cycle of drugs, criminality, and incarceration.

Like many of you, my dedication to this work is personal as well as professional – because, as a former U.S. Attorney and Superior Court judge, I have witnessed the devastating impact that prescription drug and substance abuse can have on individuals, on families, and on entire communities.  I understand the importance of bringing law enforcement officers, community leaders, public health professionals, prosecutors, and other stakeholders together to confront these conditions.  In fact, during my tenure as U.S. Attorney here in Washington, my staff and I pioneered the first-ever community prosecution effort in our nation’s capital.  And we saw both the power and the necessity of employing an approach that draws on the passion, the knowledge, and the expertise of a wide range of authorities and citizens.

Based on the diverse perspectives represented here at the White House today, I know you share that confidence.  You recognize that necessity.  And that’s why you’re making sure our efforts don’t end with treatment, incarceration, or even community outreach: because, when it comes to prescription drug and heroin abuse, the problem does not begin in prisons, or in gangs, or in forgotten areas of our city streets.  It begins in our neighborhoods, on our playgrounds, in our schools.  It begins, all too often, at home.

At the end of the day, the most important work we do is invariably the work that takes place within our own communities – not simply as professionals, but as mentors, advocates, and counselors; as parents, neighbors, and friends.  We need to make sure our kids live in neighborhoods where adults can reach out to them – where moms and dads, teachers and faith leaders, little league coaches and Scoutmasters can be trusted and positive influences in young lives.  And this work must be embraced by whole communities – because it is only by standing together, through collective action and comprehensive effort, that we’ll be able to make the difference we seek.

We need your expertise – but also your passion, your dedication, and your proximity.  We need your boots on the ground and your ideas in effect – here in Washington and around the nation.  Especially over the last five years – through summits like this one and the partnerships you’ve forged on the front lines, national leaders in and far beyond this room have come together to learn, to strategize, to collaborate – and to act.  Today, we reaffirm our commitment to push these efforts forward.  And we renew our pledge to break down traditional “silos” of responsibility; to rally additional experts and allies to this cause; and to use every tool and authority at our disposal to help navigate the complex and interconnected challenges that remain before us.

We’ve seen, after all, that progress will not come easily.  Positive change will not occur as quickly as we might like.  But forums like this one are a testament to the importance of cooperation in the face of adversity.  And as long as we keep our commitments to one another; as long as we keep seeking new ways to work together; as long as we keep striving to build on the promising work that so many of you are leading – I believe there’s good reason for confidence in where these efforts will take us from here.

I am proud to count you as colleagues and partners in the considerable work that lies ahead.  I thank you, once again, for all that you’re doing – today and every day – to combat drug abuse and protect our young people.  I look forward to all that we will accomplish together in the months and years ahead.  And I wish you all a most productive summit.

Thank you.

SEC ISSUES INVESTOR ALERT FOR AFFINITY FRAUD

FROM:   U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
The SEC’s Office of Investor Education and Advocacy is issuing this Investor Alert to help educate investors about affinity fraud, a type of investment scam that preys upon members of identifiable groups, such as religious or ethnic communities or the elderly. 

What is Affinity Fraud? 
Affinity fraud almost always involves either a fake investment or an investment where the fraudster lies about important details (such as the risk of loss, the track record of the investment, or the background of the promoter of the scheme). Many affinity frauds are Ponzi or pyramid schemes, where money given to the promoter by new investors is paid to earlier investors to create the illusion that the so-called investment is successful. This tricks new investors into investing in the scheme, and lulls existing investors into believing their investments are safe. In reality, even if there really is an actual investment, the investment typically makes little or no profit. The fraudster simply takes new investors’ money for the fraudster’s own personal use, often using some of it to pay off existing investors who may be growing suspicious. Eventually, when the supply of investor money dries up and current investors demand to be paid, the scheme collapses and investors discover that most or all of their money is gone. 

How Does Affinity Fraud Work? 
Fraudsters who carry out affinity scams frequently are (or pretend to be) members of the group they are trying to defraud. The group could be a religious group, such as a particular denomination or church. It could be an ethnic group or an immigrant community. It could be a racial minority. It could be members of a particular workforce – even members of the military have been targets of these frauds. Fraudsters target any group they think they can convince to trust them with the group members’ hard-earned savings. 

At its core, affinity fraud exploits the trust and friendship that exist in groups of people who have something in common. Fraudsters use a number of methods to get access to the group. A common way is by enlisting respected leaders from within the group to spread the word about the scheme. Those leaders may not realize the “investment” is actually a scam, and they may become unwitting victims of the fraud themselves. 

Because of the tight-knit structure of many groups, it can be difficult for regulators or law enforcement officials to detect an affinity scam. Victims often fail to notify authorities or pursue legal remedies. Instead, they try to work things out within the group. This is particularly true where the fraudsters have used respected community or religious leaders to convince others to join the investment.

How to Avoid Affinity Fraud
Here are a few tips to help you avoid becoming a victim of an affinity fraud scam.
  • Even if you know the person making the investment offer, be sure to research the person’s background, as well as the investment itself – no matter how trustworthy the person who brings the investment opportunity to your attention seems to be. Be aware that the person telling you about the investment may have been fooled into believing that the investment is legitimate when it is not. 
  • Never make an investment based solely on the recommendation of a member of an organization or group to which you belong. This is especially true if the recommendation is made online. An investment pitch made through an online group of which you are a member, or on a chat room or bulletin board catered to an interest you have, may be a fraud.
  • Do not fall for investments that promise spectacular profits or “guaranteed” returns. Similarly, be extremely leery of any investment that is said to have no risks. Very few investments are risk-free. Promises of quick and high profits, with little or no risk, are classic warning signs of fraud. 
  • Be skeptical of any investment opportunity that you can’t get in writing. Fraudsters often avoid putting things in writing. Avoid an investment if you are told they do not have time to put in writing the particulars about the investment. You should also be suspicious if you are told to keep the investment opportunity confidential or a secret. 
  • Don’t be pressured or rushed into buying an investment before you have a chance to research the “opportunity.” Just because someone you know made money, or claims to have made money, doesn’t mean you will, too. Be especially skeptical of investments that are pitched as “once-in-a-lifetime” opportunities, particularly when the salesperson bases the recommendation on “inside” or confidential information. 

DAVID M. LUNA ON IMPACT OF INTERNATIONAL CRIME

FROM:  U.S. STATE DEPARTMENT

How Criminal Entrepreneurs are Confiscating the Economic Potential of Communities and Corrupting Governments and the Integrity of Markets

Remarks
David M. Luna
Director for Anticrime Programs, Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs
UNICRI Impact of Organized Crime Workshop
Rome, Italy
June 16, 2014


Buon giorno!
On behalf of the United States, I would like to thank the Government of Italy’s Ministry of Economic Development and the United Nations Interregional Crime and Justice Research Institute (UNICRI) for co-hosting this week’s workshop with the U.S. Department of State, and for our partnership on developing methodologies to identify strategies to measure and reduce the impact of transnational organized crime (TOC) on the legal economy.

The topics that we will be addressing are critically important to the international community as we work together to:
  • inform the public on the harms and impacts of organized crime;
  • strengthen cooperation to disrupt and dismantle illicit networks across borders, including through tracking illicit financial flows and identifying, freezing or seizing, and confiscating illicit assets;
  • ensure that the global illegal economy does not continue to expand at the expense of the legal one; and
  • safeguard tomorrow’s growth markets and investment frontiers so that they do not become corrupted by criminal entrepreneurs determined to further diversify their illicit portfolios and perpetuate criminal acivity.
The focus of this workshop is timely. Today’s reality across the global threat environment is one of convergence: where criminals and illicit traders are networked across borders and are continuously expanding their tentacles to all parts of the world, infiltrating public and market-based institutions alike.

The illicit activities of organized criminals threaten not only the interdependent commercial, transportation, and transactional systems that facilitate free trade and the movement of people throughout the global economy, but jeopardize governance structures, economic development, security, and supply chain integrity.

Of equal concern is their penetration into the fabric of our daily lives by capitalizing on our vulnerabilities, and through a variety of criminal schemes, including money laundering, reinvesting their criminally-derived proceeds to create parallel markets based on corruption and criminality, and hubs of fear.

Toxicity to Communities: TOC Impact on Public Health and Safety
Ladies and gentlemen, organized criminals are neither the noble protectors nor the business providers that they claim to be to the public.

How can they be, especially when they engage in unconscionable usury (“loan sharking”), extortion, bribery and corruption that continue to decay the foundations for resilient economies?
When they lend money to hard-working people at exorbitant interest rates and then resort to threats and violence to recoup their monies?

Moreover, when tens of thousands of small- and medium-sized companies and “mom and pop” businesses across Europe and elsewhere have to close their doors due to the high prevalence of usurious debt, this is harmful to both economic growth and market resiliency, as well as efforts by our families to improve their livelihoods, and those of their children.

When criminal syndicates engage in the illegal dumping of hazardous waste, it not only impacts our environment, it also imperils the health and safety of our children when such mafia toxic waste ends up in rivers, lakes, water wells, and farming lands that are poisoning agricultural crops. In essence, toxic water streams are now becoming toxic streams in people’s blood systems.

When organized crime perpetuates modern slavery and human trafficking including luring women and young girls to be physically exploited and abused, and forced to pay their bondage debts through prostitution and other forms of indentured work, it corrupts our human capital and dispirits the soul of our humanity.

No these are not “friends,” but rapacious and violent thugs whose greed and wealth is derived from drug addicts, the hard work of entrapped, exploited modern slaves, and the most vulnerable members of our communities: the sick, poor, desperate, and innocent.

Toxicity of TOC to the Licit Economy: Blood Money is Financing Booming Black Markets
In addition to harming the welfare of our people, transnational organized criminal networks are imperiling the global legal economy.

In his book Illicit, Moises Naim underscores how “global criminal activities are transforming the international system, upending the rules, creating new players, and reconfiguring power in international politics and economics.” Professors Louise Shelley, Ernesto Savona, Xavier Raufer, and others have similarly done pioneering research on today’s threat hybrids and new actors (“el dorados”) and their powerful economic influence across sectors and industries.
I agree with Naim and these distinguished criminologists: global criminal activities have transformed the system, changed the rules, and altered power dynamics across the globe. According to some estimates, the illegal economy accounts for 8 to 15 percent of world GDP, distorting local economies, diminishing legitimate business revenues, fueling conflict, and deteriorating social conditions in many of today global security “hot spots.”

A report by A.T. Kearney titled, “The Shadow Economy in Europe, 2013”, estimates the shadow economy in Europe at €2.15 trillion, which is 18.5 per cent of the total economy. Here in Italy, over the past 10 years, there have been numerous estimates placing the major Italian mafias’ market share at around 3 to 7 percent of Italy’s GDP. In fact, recently Italy’s national statistical service, Istat, decided that it was including the black market in its GDP calculations and illicit enterprises such as drug trafficking, human trafficking, prostitution, counterfeits, and other criminal activities.

Of particular significance are the specific sectors that they invest in, consolidate, and now control. Media reports have estimated that the major Italian organized crime families control about one in five business in Italy.

I earlier underscored how criminals have diversified their portfolios in areas, for example, such as narcotics and human trafficking, usury, and environmental crime. But irrespective of which illicit trade areas criminals gravitate to, when it comes time to reinvesting their profits, there are certain sectors that are equally very attractive for them to influence and control, including banking, real estate, tourism, fashion, and the arts, sports, and entertainment industries.
While some argue that injecting any capital, licit or illicit, into local economies can help some communities in times of financial austerity – especially when citizens perceive that their own governments have failed to provide good governance and basic services – I would assert that filthy lucre or blood money that corrupts markets is not a desirable business model in any situation.

It has been well reported how money from the sale of cocaine, heroin, and other drugs in illicit markets is reinvested in numerous sectors where laundering illicit proceeds, often paid in cash, is easy and undetected. Among the alluring choices for criminals to disguise and reinvest their illicit proceeds from drugs and other crimes and integrate them into the formal economy include construction and real estate. Flushed with cash, organized crime has invested heavily in snapping up bars, restaurants, supermarkets, shops, hotels, resorts and other high-end luxury developments.

This is why asset recovery is important to our discussion this week and how the international community can work together to identify and recover illicit assets. When criminals are deprived of the fruits of their criminal activity, their overall economic and corruptive power is reduced and we can further prevent the infiltration of criminal money into the legitimate economy.

TOC Toxicity to National Economic Security and Market Integrity
Let me say a few words on the damage that transnational organized crime can inflict on market integrity, entrepreneurial innovation, brand integrity, and legitimate private enterprise.
As we are keenly aware, another profitable area for criminals these days is counterfeiting and pirated goods, including wine and liquor, cigarettes, pharmaceuticals, computers and electronics, and other products. Trafficking in counterfeit luxury and designer goods and accessories has become more profitable to organized crime than narcotics trafficking.
If one were to walk in some of our major cities, one could easily confront vendors selling some of these goods and others who are hawking designer bags, watches, eyewear, jewelry, footwear, and other luxury knockoffs, that have been counterfeited or smuggled by criminals across borders including such iconic brands such as GUCCI, Prada, Fendi, Louis Vuitton, Giorgio Armani, Polo, and others. Last year, I even learned that one could buy a fake Ferrari, with an unfashionable “turbocharged” Toyota Corolla engine. This is unfortunate because all over the world, smart consumers celebrate the real brands, trust their quality, and love their style.

Of course, the illegal economy and demand for fake handbags, shoes, perfumes, apparel and other luxury products make it harder for legitimate business to compete against these imported fake products. In these instances, illicit trade results in lost profits for companies, job displacements for workers, and with business closures, governments too are economically impacted as less revenue is brought into the treasuries to fund public services.
However, economic loss is not the only harm that results from fake goods. Companies also have to address the diminished integrity and market reputation of their venerable brands that they have worked hard to build and innovate upon over many years.

The same bad actors and networks who reinvest their blood money into the legal economy and who are undermining the good efforts of dedicated public servants and businesses to spur ethical, rule-of-law based markets and to broaden prosperity across communities—these bad actors and networks remain winners in the illegal economy.

We need to drain the swamp of criminality and cesspools of illicit activity that are corrupting our institutions, markets, and iconic brands.

We must not allow any further opportunities for criminal entrepreneurs to fill the role of governments and private enterprise as service providers in our societies nor allow their blood money to become the currency that sustains the global or local economy.

U.S. and International Efforts to Combat TOC and Illicit Trade
Finally, let me outline some of the efforts that the United States is undertaking to combat the threats posed by TOC, recover illicit assets, and shut down the illegal economy.
Recognizing the expanding size, scope, and influence of TOC and its impact on U.S. and international security and governance, in July 2011 the White House released the Strategy to Combat Transnational Organized Crime: Addressing Converging Threats to National Security.

The Strategy calls on all departments and agencies to “build, balance, and integrate the tools of American power to combat transnational organized crime…and urge our foreign partners to do the same.”

The Strategy also calls for the U.S. government and our international partners to work together to combat transnational illicit networks, and take that fight to the next level by breaking their corruptive power, attacking their financial underpinnings, stripping them of their illicit wealth, and severing their access to the financial system.

The new TOCRP program complements the Narcotics Rewards Program by offering rewards up to $5 million for information on significant transnational criminal organizations involved in activities beyond drug trafficking, such as human trafficking, money laundering, trafficking in arms, counterfeits and pirated goods, and other illicit trade areas.

We anticipate that by rewarding informants who provide leads and tips that help hobble transnational criminal organizations, we can protect our citizens, economies, and homeland.
On the issue of how best to administer and dispose of confiscated illicit assets, our governments should strive to ensure that funds are disposed of in a manner that recognizes and compensates legitimate victims, addresses legitimate law enforcement needs, and promotes enhanced governmental transparency and accountability.

Italy has taken note of this goal, using confiscated assets from organized crime for numerous causes that support social good. In fact, confiscated properties have been used for social centers to help children, individuals with special needs, and for other communal functions that serve the public interest.

Efforts consistent with international standards as set forth in the FATF Recommendations and law enforcement cooperation within the frameworks of multilateral instruments such as the United Nations Conventions against Corruption (UNCAC) and Transnational Organized Crime (UNTOC) are used successfully by governments to facilitate mutual legal assistance and other forms of international cooperation, including the exchange of intelligence and information between law enforcement. These tools are also very effective in preventing criminals from acquiring and enjoying the fruits of their criminal activity.

Consistent with international standards and our treaty obligations, I believe that it is important for countries to have a strong legislative framework for effective detection and prevention of illicit financial activity and the means to identify illicit assets, freeze or seize, and confiscate the same. This would include implementation of powerful asset recovery tools such as non-conviction based forfeiture, which is key to overcoming common hurdles to asset recovery such as the death, flight, or immunity of an offender; mechanisms to ensure that identified assets are properly preserved and managed until a final confiscation judgment is obtained; and processes to ensure the transparent and responsible disposition of confiscated property.

At INL, through many of our anti-crime training programs, including our network of International Law Enforcement Academies, we are integrating aspects of asset recovery training in our projects and courses, and helping to improve the capacity of partners to undertake complex asset recovery investigations.

And of course diplomatically, we continue to strengthen international cooperation between U.S. law enforcement authorities with committed partners such as Italy and other G7 countries, international organizations including the European Union, the Council of Europe, UNODC, UNICRI, INTERPOL, the Egmont Group of Financial Intelligence Units, EUROPOL’s Camden Asset Recovery Interagency Network, the OECD Task Force on Charting Illicit Trade, and many others.

Converging against Criminal Entrepreneurs and Confiscating their Assets
In closing, convergence defines the global economy today. We live in a world in which legal business transactions and legitimate commerce both facilitate and feed off the illegal economy.
Crimes such as counterfeiting, human trafficking, money laundering and corruption are often interconnected, with profits from one illicit trade area used to advance further criminal complicity in other areas.

If we are not vigilant, the illegal economy presents an existential threat that we cannot afford to ignore.

But there is hope including in efforts such as the addiopizzo campaign in Palermo where citizens have mobilized to say that “enough is enough” can make a difference in our fight against organized crime and for communities to denounce their extorters. As the campaign rightly underscores: “As long as somebody continues to pay the pizzo, we will not be free.”
My hope is that by the end of tomorrow, we can have some good solutions to devise better ways of recovering illicit assets, and ensuring that we are disposing of the same in a way that creates better lives and sustainable futures for impacted communities, while recognizing that the real threat of the illegal economy centers in convergence, and that we can no longer turn a blind eye on corruption and organized crime.

Thank you.

NSF FUNDS RESEARCH ON CRUSTACEAN PATHOGENS

FROM:  NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION 
Summer brings crab feasts--and concerns for Chesapeake blue crabs
Infectious diseases play a part in crab population declines

It's almost summer. Seafood restaurants from coast-to-coast are serving platter after platter of steaming crabs, ready for hammering and picking. The supply seems endless, but is it?

Not if we're talking about blue crabs from Chesapeake Bay.

The bay's iconic blue crab population has dropped to levels not seen since before restrictions were placed on the fishery more than five years ago. What's to blame?

A long and, by Mid-Atlantic standards, brutal winter has been fingered as one culprit. In one of the worst die-offs in recent history, more than a quarter of the Chesapeake's blue crabs perished in the frigid waters.

More than cold water to blame

But that's not the only factor, says disease ecologist Jeff Shields of the Virginia Institute of Marine Sciences in Gloucester Point, Va.

"Several commercially important crustacean populations, including blue crabs, have had declines linked to diseases," says Shields. "In most cases, though, the underlying causes have been difficult to pinpoint because crustacean pathogens [infectious agents] aren't very well known."

To help determine what's infecting Chesapeake blue crabs and other crustaceans, the National Science Foundation (NSF) awarded Shields a grant through the joint NSF-NIH Ecology and Evolution of Infectious Diseases Program.

"We know very little about how disease affects populations of marine invertebrates and even less about how disease might interact with other stressors, such as overfishing," says Dave Garrison, director of NSF's Biological Oceanography Program, which also funded the research.

"This study is a major step toward discovering new ways of wisely managing our coastal resources."

One Chesapeake Bay blue crab killer may be a single-celled parasitic dinoflagellate named Hematodinium, a scourge that infects blue crabs and is of concern in fisheries not only in the Chesapeake, but around the world.

Outbreak in the crab pot and the shedding house

The parasite was first reported along the U.S. East Coast in the 1970s and found in the Chesapeake's blue crabs in the 1990s.

In a Hematodinium outbreak, some 50 percent of crabs caught in fishing pots may die. That number jumps to 75 percent in "shedding houses" where crabs molt their shells, then are collected for the soft-shell industry.

"Infection is almost always fatal--for the crabs," says Shields, who adds that the disease isn't harmful to humans.

In a breakthrough for blue crabs, Shields and colleagues recently succeeded in their effort to uncover the life history of Hematodinium.

"Describing the entire life cycle of Hematodinium is an important step toward controlling the infection," says Shields. "With all the parasite's stages in culture in the lab, we can learn when Hematodinium is most infectious."

The biologists made their discovery by looking at many parasite generations over a year-long period.

Answers under a microscope

Through the research, scientists now know that Hematodinium takes some 40 to 50 days to develop. "That matches what we see in the field," he says. "We think infection is linked with blue crabs' molting cycles."

Hematodinium usually infects young crabs. Some 50 to 70 percent of juvenile blue crabs along the Virginia coast carry the pathogen, "and it's prevalent in bays and inlets along the entire U.S. East Coast," says Shields.

The high cost--to the crab population and to the humans that depend on it--comes in the deaths of young blue crabs before they can make their way from coastal spawning grounds to brackish tributaries, where they become large enough to legally catch.

"Imagine a harvest with 50 percent more crabs," says Shields. "The toll exacted by Hematodinium is very clear."

The parasite is after more than blue crabs, however.

"You can't fish out the blue crabs somewhere and hope this pathogen will be gone," says Shields. "It's also in many other crustaceans, including spider crabs, rock crabs and other swimming crabs."

Insights from the bay's shape

Outbreaks of Hematodinium are linked with certain geographic features, such as shallow bays, lagoons and fjords. "Such features are ideal for the growth and spread of pathogens, as they serve to focus transmissive stages or retain them within the system," writes Shields in a paper published in the Journal of Invertebrate Pathology.

Four factors may facilitate epidemics of Hematodinium and other pathogens: relatively "closed" host (crab) populations, with little immigration and emigration of juveniles and adults; bays with restricted water exchange with the open ocean, which hold in pathogens; stressful environmental conditions, such as overfishing and seasonal hypoxia, or "dead zones"; and pathogens that can rapidly multiply.

"The Chesapeake has several of these features," Shields says.

Managing for pathogens

Shields and colleagues are working to understand how Hematodinium is transmitted in wild crustacean populations and at shrimp farms and other aquaculture operations. "We hope to develop 'best practices' for managing, in particular, the Chesapeake's wild blue crabs."

Diseases can have serious effects on commercial fisheries, Shields says. "But there's a perception among resource managers and fishers that diseases aren't important to the fishing industry, or that little can be done to manage them."

Too few fishery models use information like disease prevalence and distribution, according to Shields, and fisheries management decisions often don't consider disease.

"Estimates of disease-induced effects such as mortality or 'negative marketability' can be incorporated into existing models to improve stock assessment and management," Shields writes in the Journal of Invertebrate Pathology.

Disease may be the sleeper in the decline of the Chesapeake Bay blue crab.

Hard-hit by freezing temperatures, low-oxygen waters and overfishing, unless disease is taken into account, believes Shields, the next blue crabs caught may be headed not to your dinner table, but to the crustacean equivalent of the ICU.

-- Cheryl Dybas, NSF
Investigators
Harry Wang
Kimberly Reece
Jeffrey Shields
Related Institutions/Organizations

Search This Blog

Translate

White House.gov Press Office Feed