DEPUTY DEFENSE SECRETARY CARTER ATTENDS MUNICH SECURITY CONFERENCE

U.S. Deputy Defense Secretary Ashton B. Carter walks with U.S. Ambassador to Germany Philip D. Murphy as they prepare to meet with German Defense Minister Karl Ernst Thomas de Maizière during the 49th Munich Security Conference in Munich, Feb. 2, 2013. DOD photo by Glenn Fawcett

 
FROM: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
In Munich, Carter Details Sequestration's Reckless Reality
By Cheryl Pellerin
American Forces Press Service

Munich, Feb. 2, 2013 - Before one of the world's largest gatherings of foreign and defense ministers, Deputy Defense Secretary Ashton B. Carter took time to detail the grim consequences a second round of severe and potentially imminent budget cuts could have on the Defense Department.

Carter spoke as part of an expert panel that took the stage here late in the afternoon on day two of the Munich Security Conference, also called the Wehrkunde Conference on Security Policy.

Their topic was the future of European defense, and Carter was joined on the panel by Netherlands Defense Minister Jeanine-Antoinette Hennis-Plasschaert, Russian Federation Deputy Defense Minister Anatoly Antonov, European Union Commissioner for Internal Market and Services Michel Barnier, NATO Supreme Allied Commander for Transformation Gen. Jean-Paul Paloméros and others.

As the deputy secretary neared the end of his talk, he remarked on what has become nearly a routine occurrence at Munich security conferences -- a U.S. defense secretary urging allies to meet their agreed-on NATO benchmarks for defense spending.

"At this point at Wehrkunde," Carter said, "it's traditional for the DOD leader of the U.S. delegation to emphasize, as [former Defense Secretary] Bob Gates did memorably a few years ago, the need for allies to provide the necessary resources for defense."

"'In the final analysis,'" the deputy secretary quoted Gates as saying, "'there's no substitute for nations providing resources necessary to have the capability they need when faced with security challenges.'"

This time at Wehrkunde, Carter told the audience, "I have to add my own country to this exhortation because we're facing the very real prospect of a huge and reckless additional cut in our defense budget."

The department absorbed a budget cut of $487 billion over 10 years beginning in fiscal year 2012, crafting as a result, and with input from every part of DOD and the services, a defense strategy for the 21st century that President Barack Obama and the Defense Department leadership launched in January 2012.

The looming March 1 threat of another half-trillion dollars slashed from military spending over 10 years will happen unless Congress manages to avoid the "huge and reckless cuts," he said, that sequestration would generate.

"What's tragic is that this is not a result of economic emergency or recession," the deputy secretary said. "It's not because defense cuts are the answer to the fiscal challenge -- do the math. It's not in reaction to a change to a more peaceful world. It's not due to a breakthrough in military technology or a new strategic insight. It's not because paths of revenue growth and entitlement spending have been explored and exhausted. It's purely collateral damage from political gridlock."

In response, as the Defense Department's chief management officer, Carter said he has directed "that we take some immediate steps ... to protect the department as best as it is possible to do in this eventuality."

One action will be to freeze the hiring of civilians, he said, adding, "And I'll just remind you that the Department of Defense hires between 1,000 and 2,000 people a week," 44 percent of them veterans.

He'll also reduce temporary-term employees and defer maintenance contracts, among many other actions.

Sequestration will affect every function in every state and every district, he said, producing economic inefficiency and needless waste.

"The result over time, in fact very quickly, would be a readiness crisis. And the effect over a longer period of time would be to threaten the [new defense] strategy itself," Carter said.

On the European side of the Atlantic, he added, "I know that, in myriad ways that are different for every country, something similar is happening -- a political dynamic that threatens spending."

That's why, in his Wehrkunde address today, Carter spoke to Europeans and Americans, he said, "about the level of investment they're willing to make to protect our great countries and the great unity and values represented by our countries."

NATO SECRETARY GENERAL RASMUSSEN SAYS NATO MUST 'KEEP OPERATIONAL EDGE'

FROM: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Rasmussen: NATO Must be Ready for Any Future Threat
By Cheryl Pellerin
American Forces Press Service

Munich, Feb. 2, 2013 - On the second day of the Munich Security Conference, NATO Secretary-General Anders Fogh Rasmussen told the international audience here that the end of the war in Afghanistan gives the alliance a chance to plan for the future.

The end in 2014 of NATO's biggest operation gives NATO a chance to generate key capabilities, engage robustly with new geopolitical realities and rebalance its priorities and commitments, he said.

"In other words, an opportunity to plan for the future," Rasmussen said, adding that such a plan must determine what NATO will do next, how NATO will do it, and what kind of alliance it will be.

"We will continue to respond to crises whenever and wherever the allies judge their security interests are at stake because this is our core business," the secretary-general said.

"When I look at our world, I see an arc of crises stretching from the Sahel to Central Asia," he added, "[but] ... this does not mean we will have to intervene everywhere nor that we are set for confrontation. But it does mean we must stand ready to deter and defend against any threat."

Rasmussen said NATO must keep its operational edge and retain a complete range of capabilities, with increased importance for missile and cyber defense and special operations forces.

"Missile defense is a core element of our collective defense," he added, "and the deployment of Patriot missiles to Turkey is a real response to a real threat."

Many European allies contribute to NATO's missile defense system, but Rasmussen said he can envision European navies upgrading their ships with missile defense radars and interceptors so they can deploy alongside United States vessels.

"We must also improve our cyber resilience," he said, describing a potentially critical role for NATO in defining a common training approach among allies and in providing expert help to allies who come under cyber attack.

"We will also need forces with the skills and speed to act decisively," Rasmussen said, envisioning a vital role for NATO's new Special Operations Forces Headquarters in planning and coordinating missions and improving the ability of allied special operations forces to work together.

To make sure that NATO remains the gold standard of Euro-Atlantic security into the 21st century, he said, the alliance must build on its gains from operations like its International Security Assistance Force mission in Afghanistan "rather than cash in what some may perceive as a post-ISAF dividend."

A better choice is to reinvest the ISAF dividend in defense for a maximum return, Rasmussen said, including through NATO's Connected Forces -- which seeks to create forces that act and think as one -- and its Smart Defense initiatives.

NATO's multinational response force can deploy quickly when needed, but Rasmussen wants the alliance to revitalize that force, he said, "to keep our ability to train and operate together as allies and with partners, take advantage of the United States' decision to rotate dedicated units to Europe and conduct more demanding, realistic and frequent exercises."

The NATO Response Force should become the engine of the alliance's future readiness, he added, and multinational cooperation is key to keeping costs down and capabilities strong.

Rasmussen sees NATO connecting more closely with the alliance's most able operational partners, reinforcing its cooperation with the United Nations and the European Union, deepening its strategic relationship with Russia and shifting from operational engagement to operational readiness.

Such readiness and flexibility come at a cost, he added.

"In the decade since 2001, the U.S. share of NATO defense expenditure has increased from 63 percent to 72 percent," the secretary-general said, and in the last few years all but three European allies have cut their defense budgets.

"I am concerned about this gap in defense spending but I am even more concerned by the gap in some key capabilities," he added.

To correct this, Rasmussen said, he would like to see the alliance moving toward a day when no single ally provides more than 50 percent of certain critical capabilities.

"This will require European allies to do more," Rasmussen said, adding that a strong European contribution to NATO's capabilities will sustain a strong U.S. commitment to NATO.

All allies must also show the political will to support each other, living up to NATO's role as the political forum for transatlantic consultations on common security concerns, he said, " ... because now and after 2014, we can only stay successful together."